Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:08:24.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Shift: The U.N. System and the New Regionalism in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrés Rivarola Puntigliano
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzes Latin America in light of the post–Cold War transformation of the global system. Much of Latin American foreign policy studies traditionally has been concerned with the region's subordinate position to “core” countries (generally, developed states and their ruling elites) and the degree to which these countries' policies constrain Latin American policies and development. While this juxtaposition is still a major topic, it ignores the leverage of new “spheres of authority” (SOAs), where global rules and norms are increasingly sustained. A hypothesis presented here is that the U.N. system is an example of such an SOA, which creates a new context for the insertion of periphery demands in the international agenda. A second hypothesis is that such insertion is increasingly made through the creation of new regional groupings, which are an expression of national development and security demands. Such processes carry both new possibilities and challenges.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , Spring 2007 , pp. 89 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Samir, Amin. 2000. Capitalism in the Age of Globalization: The Management of Contemporary Society. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Kofi, Annan. 2004. Statement by Secretary General Kofi Annan at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. June 14. <http://www.un.orgwebcastunctadxispeeches14sg_eng.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Giovanni, Arrighi, and Silver, Beverly J.. 1999. Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Louis, Balthazar 1996. Changes in the World System and U.S. Relations with the Americas. In Foreign Policy and Regionalism in the Americas, ed. Mace, Gordon and Thérien, Jean-Philippe Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 19–39.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Bayne, and Woolcock, Stephen, eds. 2004. The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations. G8 and Global Governance Series. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jagdish, Bhagwati. 1997. Fast Track to Nowhere. Economist 345, 8039: 21–24.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, . 2004. Don't Cry for Cancún. Foreign Affairs 83, 1 (January-February): 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Richard J. 1994. Making the Western Hemisphere Safe for Democracy? The OAS Defense-of-Democracy Regime. In Collective Responses to Regional Problems: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. Carl Kaysen, Robert A. Pastor, and Reed, Laura W.. Cambridge, MA: Committee on International Security Studies, American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 15–29.Google Scholar
John, Boli, and Georg Thomas, M., eds. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores. 2004. Entrevista concedida por el secretario de relaciones exteriores, Luís Ernesto Derbez, durante su gira de trabajo por Brazil. Versión estenográfica. April 12. <http://www.sre.gob.mxcomunicadosentrevistasentre_2004e-33-01.htm> Accessed April 12, 2004.+Accessed+April+12,+2004.>Google Scholar
Nils, Brunsson, and Jacobsson, Bengt, eds. 2000. A World of Standards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Buzan 1991. New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-first Century. International Affairs 67, 3: 431–51.Google Scholar
Barry, Buzan, and Little, Richard 2000. International Systems in World Theory: Remaking the Study of International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 2001. Charting a New Course: The Politics of Globalization and Social Transformation. ed. Mauricio, A. Font. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fernando Henrique, Cardoso, and Faletto, Enzo 1974. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Carranza, Mario E. 2003. Can Mercosur Survive? Domestic and International Constraints on Mercosur. Latin American Politics and Society 45, 2 (Summer): 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, Castells. 1997. The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
José A, Da Cruz. 2005. Brazil's International Relations at the Dawn of the Twenty-first Century. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 1 (Spring): 115–22.Google Scholar
Francisco, Delich. 2004. Repensar América Latina. Barcelona: Gredisa.Google Scholar
Rut, Diamint. 2004. Security Challenges in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research 23, 1: 43–62.Google Scholar
James, Dobbin. 2005. Nation-Building: Un Surpasses Us on Learning Curve. Rand Review, August 3. <http://www.rand.orgpublicationsrandreviewissuesspring2005nation.html?fpsrc=Primer050725>..>Google Scholar
Economist. 1998. Alphabetti Spaghetti. 349, 8088 (October 3): 19–21.Google Scholar
Economist. 2002. Lifelines for Brazil and Uruguay. 364, 8285 (October 10): 33–36.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). 2004. Directorate-General for External Relations. June 17. <http://www.europa.eu.intcommexternal_relationslaindex.htm>..>Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert, eds. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amitai, Etzioni. 2004. From Empire to Community. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ricardo, Ffrench-Davis, and Studart, Rogério. 2003. The Regional Fallout of Argentina's Crisis. In The Crisis that Was Not Prevented: Lessons for Argentina, the IMF, and Globalisation, ed. Teunissen, Jan Joost and Akkerman, Age The Hague: FONDAD. 68–77.Google Scholar
Andre Gunder, Frank. 1971. Underutveckling eller revolution i Latinamerika. Essáer om underutvecklingens utveckling och den omedelbara fienden. Stockholm: TEMA, Rabén and Sjögren.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Frankel. 2001. The Crusade for Free Trade: Evaluating Clinton's International Economic Policy. Foreign Affairs 80, 2 (March-April): 155–57.Google Scholar
Alicia, Frohmann. 1994. Regional Initiatives for Peace and Democracy: The Collective Diplomacy of the Rio Group. In Collective Responses to Regional Problems: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. Kaysen, Carl, Pastor, Robert A., and Reed, Laura W.. Cambridge, MA: Committee on International Security Studies, American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 129–42.Google Scholar
Glennon, Michael J. 2003. Why the Security Council Failed. Foreign Affairs (May-June): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Goldman. 2003. Dreaming with Brics: the Path to 2050. Global Economics Paper no. 99. <http://www2.goldmansachs.cominsightresearchreports99.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Group of Seventy-Seven at the United Nations. 2004. July 14. <http://www.g77.org>..>Google Scholar
Jürgen, Habermas. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Michael, Hardt, and Negri, Antonio. 2001. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peter, Hakim. 2002. Two Ways to Go Global. Foreign Affairs 81, 1 (January–February): 148–62.Google Scholar
David, Held, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David, and Perraton, Jonathan. 2001. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Felipe, Herrera. 1967. El desarrollo de América Latina y su financiamiento. Buenos Aires: Aguilar Argentina.Google Scholar
Björn, Hettne. 2001. Discourses on Peace and Development. Progress in Development Studies 1, 1.Google Scholar
Hettne, Björn, András, Inotai, and Sunkel, Osvaldo, eds. 1999. Globalism and the New Regionalism, vol. 1. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, Jeanne A. K., and Mora, Frank O., eds. 2003. Latin American and Caribbean Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stephen, Hobden, and Hobson, John M.. 2002. Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. 2002. What's at Stake in Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations? Transcending “Cronofetishism” and “Tempocentrism” in International Relations. In Hobden, and Hobson, 2002. 3–42.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M., and Michel, M. Kostecki. 1995. The Political Economy of the World Trade System: From Gatt to WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robert, Kagan. 2004. America's Crisis of Legitimacy. Foreign Affairs 83, 2 (March-April): 65–88.Google Scholar
Celso, Lafer. 2001. A identidade internacional do Brasil e a política externa brasileira pasado, presente e futuro. São Paulo: Perspectiva.Google Scholar
Latin American Special Report. 2004. Brazil's Foreign Policy under Lula. Sr-04–02. May.Google Scholar
Heraldo, Muñoz. 1996. Collective Action for Democracy in the Americas. In Latin American Nations in World Politics, 2nd edition, ed. Muñoz, and Tulchin, Joseph S.. Boulder: Westview Press. 17–35.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2004. Latin American Allies of U.S.: Docile and Reliable No Longer. January 9.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2004. The Decline of America's Soft Power: Why Washington Should Worry. Foreign Affairs 83, 3 (May-June): 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poder. 2003. Trade is a Security Imperative. No. 66 (April).Google Scholar
Raúl, Prebisch. 1949. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. United Nations Publications no. 1950.II.G.2. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games. In Evans, et al. 1993. 431–69.Google Scholar
Andrés, Rivarola. 2003. Mirrors of Change: A Study of Industry Associations in Chile and Uruguay. Stockholm: Institute of Latin American Studies, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Francisco, Rojas Aravena. 2005. La importancia de una visión regional. Interview. Revista Puente Europa, August 1. <http://www.obreal.unibo.itreview.aspx> ?IdReview=10.+?IdReview=10.>Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent W0orld. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eduard, Shils. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shils, . 1988. Core and Periphery: An Idea and Its Career, 1935–1987. In Center: Ideas and Institutions, ed. Greenfeld, Liah and Martin, Michel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 250–81.Google Scholar
Kathryn, Sikkink. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 10, 3: 571–611.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2004. Overview. <http://www.un.orgOverviewbrief.html> Accessed July 12.+Accessed+July+12.>Google Scholar
Waever, Ole. 1997. Concepts of Security. Ph.D. diss., University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
John, Williamson. 1993. Democracy and the “Washington Consensus. World Development 21, 8: 1329–36.Google Scholar
Wolfensohn, James D. 2003. A New Global Balance: the Challenge of Leadership. Speech by James D. Wolfensohn at the Board of Governors of the World Bank Group joint Annual Discussion, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, September 23. <http://www.siteresources.worldbank.orgNEWSResourcesjdwsp-092303.pdf>..>Google Scholar