Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:21:20.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electoral Reform Under Limited Party Competition: The Adoption of Proportional Representation in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2018

Gabriel L. Negretto  and
Giancarlo Visconti
Gabriel L. Negretto*
Affiliation:
Professor of political science in the Division of Political Studies, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Giancarlo Visconti*
Affiliation:
Doctoral candidate in the Department of Political Science, Columbia University
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adoption of proportional representation in Western Europe has been portrayed as either a defensive or an offensive competition strategy used by established parties to deal with the rise of new parties under majoritarian electoral rules. Neither explanation accounts for PR reform in other regions of the world, where the change took place in the absence of increased party competition. Analyzing the history of electoral reform in Latin America, this article argues that in a context of limited party competition, the initial adoption of PR was part of a strategy of controlled political liberalization promoted by authoritarian rulers. Subdividing this general reasoning, the article shows that PR reform followed different paths depending on the nature of the authoritarian regime and the events that called into question the existing majoritarian electoral system. This argument is supported with a comparative historical analysis of cases within and across each route to reform.

Keywords

Proportional representationelectoral reformWestern EuropeLatin Americaauthoritarian regimesparty competition
Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 27 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 University of Miami 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abecia Valdivieso, Valentín. 1999. Historia del parlamento. La Paz: Sagitario.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Amel. 2013. Democracy and the Politics of Electoral System Choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anales de la Cámara de Representantes. 1929. Sesión del 5 de noviembre. Bogotá.Google Scholar
Andrews, Josephine, and Jackman, Robert. 2005. Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice Under Extreme Uncertainty. Electoral Studies 24, 1: 65–84.Google Scholar
Bethell, Leslie. 1990. The Cambridge History of Latin America. Volume 7, 1930 to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1999. Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies. American Political Science Review 93, 3: 609–624.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2010. Electoral Markets, Party Strategies, and Proportional Representation. American Political Science Review 104, 2: 404–413.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, Miller, Michael, and Rosato, Sebastian. 2013. A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46, 12: 1523–1554.Google Scholar
Buquet, Daniel, and Castellano, Ernesto. 1994. Representación proporcional y democracia en Uruguay. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 8: 107–123.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2009. The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation: Partisan Biases and Electoral Regime Change Under Increasing Party Competition. World Politics 61, 2: 254–295.Google Scholar
Caramani, Daniele. 2000. The Societies of Europe: Elections in Western Europe Since 1815. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Chasquetti, Daniel. 2003. El proceso constitucional uruguayo. In Política en el siglo XX, ed. Benjamin Nahum and Gerardo Caetano. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M., ed. 2004. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2007. Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems. American Political Science Review 101, 3: 373–391.Google Scholar
Delgado, Oscar. 2002. Los sistemas electorales para el Congreso en Colombia (1821–2002). Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 4, 2: 67–129.Google Scholar
Diario de Sesiones de la H. Convención Nacional Constituyente de la República Oriental del Uruguay (1916–1917). 1918. Vol. 2. Montevideo: Imprenta Nacional.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Reprint ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Faig Garicoits, Francisco. 1996. Sistema electoral y gobernabilidad en Uruguay. Montevideo: Ediciones Trilce.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, Russell H. 1952. Adoption of a Collegiate Executive in Uruguay. Journal of Politics 14, 4: 616–642.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Ricardo, and Morales, Mauricio. 2016. Deciding on the Electoral System: Adoption of the Proportional System in Chile in 1925. Latin American Politics and Society 57, 2: 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
García Montero, Mercedes. 2003. Bolivia. In Los partidos políticos de América Latina, ed. Manuel Alcántara and Flavia Freidenberg. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica. 33–148.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2006. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John, and Cojocaru, Lee. 2016. Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis: A Diversity of Goals and Methods. Sociological Methods and Research 45, 3: 392–423.Google Scholar
Golder, Matt. 2003. Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946–2000. Electoral Studies 24, 2: 103–121.Google Scholar
Guibert Patiño, Yamile Silvia. 2014. ¿Divide y vencerás? La política detrás de la adopción de la representación proporcional en el Perú. Paper presented at the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, May 21–24.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé, and Roessler, Philip G.. 2006. Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 50, 2: 365–381.Google Scholar
Klein, Herbert. 2003. A Concise History of Bolivia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, Marcus. 2010. Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation. American Political Science Review 104, 2: 369–392.Google Scholar
Leaño Román, Eduardo. 2005. Sistemas electorales en Bolivia. La conversión de votos en cargos del ejecutivo y el legislativo. La Paz: Corte Nacional Electoral.Google Scholar
Leemann, Lucas, and Mares, Isabela. 2014. The Adoption of Proportional Representation. Journal of Politics 76, 2: 461–478.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Molina, Ivan. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, ed. Lipset and Rokkan. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2013. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maiztegui Casas, Lincoln. 2005. Orientales 2: una historia política del Uruguay. De 1865 a 1938. Montevideo: Planeta.Google Scholar
Mayorga García, Fernando. 2013. Historia de la organización electoral en Colombia (1888– 2012). Vicisitudes de la consolidación democrática en un país complejo. Bogotá: Facultad de Jurisprudencia, Universidad del Rosario.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, Sebastián, and Robinson, James. 2009. Political Conflict and Power Sharing in the Origins of Modern Colombia. Hispanic American Historical Review 89, 2: 285–321.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, and Weldon, Jeffrey A.. 2001. Reforming Electoral Systems in Mexico. In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 173–193.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2006. Choosing How to Choose Presidents: Parties, Military Rulers, and Presidential Elections in Latin America. Journal of Politics 68, 2: 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2013. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2014. Authoritarian Constitution Making: The Role of the Military in Latin America. In Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Tom Ginsburg and Alberto Simpser. New York: Cambridge University Press. 83–110.Google Scholar
Nicolau, Jairo. 2012. Eleições no Brasil: do império aos dias atuais. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter, ed. 2005. Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook. Vols. 1 and 2. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oquist, Paul. 1980. Violence, Conflict, and Politics in Colombia. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Padilla, Alejandro Jorge. 1986. Proyectos y reformas a la Constitución Nacional: apuntes sobre el período 1930–1983. Criterio no. 1975: 586–587.Google Scholar
Pizzurno, Patricia, and Araúz, Celestino Andrés. 1996. Estudios sobre el Panamá republicano. 1903–1989. Panama City: Ediciones Manfer.Google Scholar
Posada Carbó, Eduardo, ed. 1996. Elections Before Democracy: The History of Elections in Europe and Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pujol, Miguel. 1996. Battle: el estado de bienestar en el Río de la Plata. Buenos Aires: Sudamérica.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2015. Suffrage and Voting Secrecy in General Elections. In Secrecy and Publicity in Votes and Debates, ed. Jon Elster. New York: Cambridge University Press. 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew. 2005. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2009. Why Did Western Europe Adopt Proportional Representation? A Political Geography Explanation. Unpublished mss. Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, and Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Process of Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Rouquie, Alain, and Suffern, Stephen. 1998. The Military in Latin American Politics Since 1930. In Latin America: Politics and Society Since 1930, ed. Leslie Bethell. New York: Cambridge University Press. 145–216.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S. 1995. The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government. American Political Science Review 89, 2: 327–343.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret. 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, 2: 174–197.Google Scholar
Spinelli, María Estela. 2012. La Ley Saenz Peña otra vez en debate: la revolución libertadora 1955–1958. Estudios Sociales 43: 133–145.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Mahoney, James. 2015. Comparative-Historical Analysis in Contemporary Political Science. In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, ed. Mahoney and Thelen. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
El Tiempo (Bogotá). 1929. Los Liberales votarán por los candidatos Vasquistas. October 30, 1, 16.Google Scholar
Tuesta Soldevilla, Fernando. 2001. Impacto de los sistemas electorales en el Perú. In Seminario sobre reforma del sistema electoral. Lima: Centro Carter/IDEA/NDI/IFES. 165–176.Google Scholar
University of California, San Diego (UCSD). Latin American Statistics. Database. http://libraries.ucsd.edu/collections/about/collections-of-distinction/latin-american-elections-statistics Google Scholar
Wills-Otero, Laura. 2009. Electoral Systems in Latin America: Explaining the Adoption of Proportional Representation Systems During the Twentieth Century. Latin American Politics and Society 51, 3 (Fall): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills-Otero, Laura, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2005. La evolución de los sistemas electorales en América. Revista Colección 16: 47–82.Google Scholar
White, Alastair. 1973. El Salvador. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar