Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T19:06:16.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clientelism or Something Else? Squatter Politics in Montevideo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

María José Alvarez Rivadulla
María José Alvarez Rivadulla*
Affiliation:
Universidad del Rosario in Bogotá
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through the in-depth ethnographic study of one squatter neighborhood in Montevideo and its leader’s political networks, this article illustrates a successful strategy through which some squatter neighborhoods have fought for their right to the city. This consists of opportunistic, face-to-face relationships between squatter leaders and politicians of various factions and parties as intermediaries to get state goods, such as water, building materials, electricity, roads, and ultimately land tenure. Through this mechanism, squatters have seized political opportunities at the national and municipal levels. These opportunities were particularly high between 1989 and 2004, years of great competition for the votes of the urban poor on the periphery of the city, when the national and municipal governments belonged to opposing parties. In terms of theory, the article discusses current literature on clientelism, posing problems that make it difficult to characterize the political networks observed among squatters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , Spring 2012 , pp. 37 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsayyad, Nezar. 1993. Squatting and Culture: a Comparative Analysis of Informal Developments in Latin America and the Middle East. Habitat International 17: 33–44.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Rivadulla, María José. 2007 [2000]. Asentamientos irregulares montevideanos: la desafiliación resistida. Cadernos metrópole PUC/SP & IPPUR/UFRJ 18: 207–49.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Rivadulla, María José. 2009. Contentious Urbanization from below: Land Squatting in Montevideo, Uruguay. Ph.D. diss, Sociology, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 1997. Introducción. In ¿Favores por votos? ed. Auyero, . Buenos Aires : Losada. 13–39.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2000. The Logic of Clientelism in Argentina: an Ethnographic Account. Latin American Research Review 35: 55–81.Google Scholar
Borges, André. 2007. Rethinking State Politics: the Withering of State Dominant Machines in Brazil. Brazilian Political Science Review 1: 108–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo and Stokes, Susan C.. 2004. Vote Buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review 39: 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buquet, Daniel. 2001. Selección de candidatos y fraccionalización partidaria en Uruguay (1942–2004). Paper presented at the 23rd conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC, September 6–8.Google Scholar
Burgwal, Gerrit. 1995. Struggle of the Poor: Neighborhood Organization and Clientelist Practice in a Quito Squatter Settlement. Amsterdam : CEDLA.Google Scholar
Canel, Eduardo. 1992. Democratization and the Decline of Urban Social Movements in Uruguay: A Political Institutional Account. In The Making of Social Movements in Latin America, ed. Escobar, Arturo and Alvarez, Sonia E.. Boulder : Westview Press. 276–90.Google Scholar
Canel, Eduardo. 2010. Barrio Democracy in Latin America: Participatory Decentralization and Community Activism in Montevideo. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, Rossana. 2005. The Politics of Social Policy Change in Chile and Uruguay: Retrenchment Versus Maintenance, 1973–1998. New York : Routledge.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation State in Latin America. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Chávez, Daniel and Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2004. La izquierda en la ciudad. Participación en los gobiernos locales de América Latina. Amsterdam : Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Dávila León de Guevara, Andrés. 1999. Clientelismo, intermediación y representación política en Colombia: ¿Qué ha pasado en los noventa? Estudios Políticos, Universidad de Antioquia 15: 61–78.Google Scholar
Dávila León de Guevara, Andrés and Delgado, Natalia. 2001. La metamorfosis del sistema político colombiano: ¿Clientelismo de mercado o nueva forma de intermediación? In Degradación o cambio. Evolución del sistema político colombiano, ed. Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco. Bogotá : Norma. 319–56.Google Scholar
Faughnan, Brian M. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2011. La compra de votos en las Américas. Perspectivas desde el Barómetro de las Américas 2011: 57.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Carlos H. 1985. Movimientos sociales en la restauración del orden democrático: Uruguay, 1985. In Movimientos sociales en el Uruguay de hoy, ed. Filgueira, . Montivideo : CLACSO-CIESU-Ediciones de la Banda Oriental. 9–50.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Fernando. 2000. Economic and Social Development: a Critique of the Neoclassical Perspective. the Case of Uruguay, 1985–1998. Ph.D. diss., Department of Sociology, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Fernando, Garcé, Adolfo, Ramos, Conrado and Yaffé, Jaime. 2003. Los dos ciclos del estado uruguayo en el siglo XX. In El Uruguay del siglo XX. La política, ed. Instituto de Ciencia Política. Montivideo : Banda Oriental. 173–204.Google Scholar
García, Miguel. 2003. ¿Ciudadanía avergonzada? Democracia local y construcción de ciudadanía en Bogotá. Bogotá : CESO/Universidad de los Andes/IEPRI-Universidad Nacional.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert. 1994. Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert. 1997. Entre el clientelismo y el universalismo. Reflexiones sobre la política popular en el Brasil urbano. In ¿Favores por votos? Estudios sobre clientelismo político contemporáneo, ed. Auyero, Javier. Buenos Aires : Losada.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert. 2001. The Even More Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Brazil. Working Paper 01–09g. Princeton : Center for Migration and Development, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2002. The Fragile Flower of Local Democracy: a Case Study of Decentralization/Participation in Montevideo. Politics and Society 30: 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Luis Eduardo. 1991. Political Structures and Democracy in Uruguay. Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Richard. 1990. Patronage and Politics in Nineteenth-century Brazil. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gros Espiell, Hector. 1964. El ejecutivo colegiado en el Uruguay. Revista de Estudios Políticos 133: 152–72.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco. 1998. La ciudad representada: política y conflicto en Bogotá. Bogotá : TM Editores/IEPRI.Google Scholar
INTEC. 1995. Relevamiento de asentimientos irregulares de Montevideo. Montivideo : INTEC.Google Scholar
Kaztman, Ruben. 1999. Activos y estructura de oportunidades. Estudios sobre las raíces de la vulnerabilidad social en Uruguay. Montivideo : PNUD-CEPAL.Google Scholar
Kaztman, Ruben. 2001. Seducidos y abandonados: el aislamiento social de los pobres urbanos. Revista de la CEPAL 75. 171–89.Google Scholar
Kaztman, Ruben, Filgueira, Fernando and Errandonea, Fernando. 2005. La ciudad fragmentada. Respuesta de los sectores populares urbanos a las transformaciones del mercado y el territorio en Montevideo. In Ciudades latinoamericanas: un análisis comparativo en el umbral del nuevo siglo, ed. Portes, Alejandro, Roberts, Bryan and Grimson, Alejandro. Buenos Aires : Prometeo. 369–423.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, and Wilkinson, . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 2004. La izquierda uruguaya: entra la oposición y el gobierno. Montivideo : Instituto de Ciencia Política.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2006. Programmatic and Non-Programmatic Voter Linkages in Two Institutionalized Party Systems: Chile and Uruguay in Comparative Perspective. Ph. D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2007. Frente Amplio and the Crafting of a Social Democratic Alternative in Uruguay. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 4 (Winter): 1–30.Google Scholar
Medina, Luis Fernando and Stokes, Susan. 2007. Monopoly and Monitoring: An Approach to Political Clientelism. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 68–83.Google Scholar
Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 2000. Desarrollo social, reforma del estado y de la seguridad social, al umbral del siglo XXI. Santiago de Chile : CEPAL.Google Scholar
Mieres, Pablo. 1994. Desobediencia y lealtad. El voto en el Uruguay de fin de siglo. Montivideo : Fin de Siglo.Google Scholar
Moraes, Juan Andrés, Chasquetti, Daniel and Bergara, Mario. 2005. The Political Economy of the Budgetary Process in Uruguay. Washington, DC : Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2010. Declared Choice: Citizen Strategies and Dual Commitment Problems in Clientelism. Paper prepared for presentation at the 68th Annual National Congress of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 23.Google Scholar
Nickerson, David W. 2010. Detecting Vote Buying in Latin America Using List Experiments. Paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics Seminar, Princeton University, April 15.Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. 1990. Uruguay, batllismo y después: Pacheco, militares y tupamaros en la crisis del Uruguay batllista. Montivideo : Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Piattoni, Simona. 2001. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñeiro, Rafael. 2004. Elección de diputados y fraccionalización partidaria en Uruguay, 1942–1999. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 14: 15–42.Google Scholar
Rama, Germán. 1971. El club político. Montivideo : ARCA.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972. Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review 66, 1: 91–113.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. Perverse Accountability: a Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99: 315–25.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. n.d. Pork by Any Other Name … Building a Conceptual Scheme of Distributive Politics. Unpublished mss. New Haven : Yale University.Google Scholar
Veneziano Esperón, Alicia. 2005. Reflexiones sobre una reforma orientada al ciudadano. La descentralización participativa de Montevideo. Madrid : Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.Google Scholar