Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T15:59:47.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brokers Beyond Clientelism: A New Perspective Through the Argentine Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rodrigo Zarazaga
Rodrigo Zarazaga*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Acción Social, Buenos Aires. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Party machines and brokers have been widely researched in political science since 1950, yet a full description of brokers' roles is still missing. This article contributes by describing in detail the many roles brokers perform for their parties and explaining why each broker performs all these roles. In particular, it shows that besides fulfilling clientelistic strategies, brokers perform important executive governability functions once their party is in power. Brokers multitask because they have the neighborhood knowledge required to successfully perform political activities at the local level. Moreover, performing nonclientelistic roles prepares brokers to perform clientelistic strategies. The article also presents a novel theoretical account for why voters abide by the clientelistic deal. Based on interviews with 120 brokers, it analyzes the complete set of brokers' strategies, and detailed narrative accounts show the clientelistic machine at work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , Fall 2014 , pp. 23 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argentina. National Ministry of Social Development. 2011. Data on people in cooperatives. February 3.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2001. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2007. La Zona Gris: violencia colectiva y política partidaria en la Argentina contemporánea. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2004. Vote Buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review 39, 2: 66–88.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Victoria Murillo, María. 2004. Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market. American Journal of Political Science 48, 4: 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2013. When Parties Meet Voters: Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies 46, 7: 851–82.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2007. Counting Heads. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerisity Press. 80–109.Google Scholar
De Luca, Miguel, Jones, Mark, and Ines Tula, María. 2002. Back Rooms or Ballot Boxes? Candidate Nomination in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 35, 4: 413–36.Google Scholar
De Luca, Miguel. 2008. Revisando las consecuencias políticas de las primarias. Un estudio sobre las elecciones de gobernador en la Argentina. POSTData 13: 81–102.Google Scholar
De Luca, Miguel. 2009. De internas, aparatos y punteros. La selección de candidatos a diputados nacionales en Argentina, 1983–2005. In Selección de candidatos, política partidista y rendimiento democrático, ed. Freidenberg, Flavia and Alcántara Sáez, Manuel. Mexico City: Tribunal Electoral del Distrito Federal/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Instituto de Iberoamérica. 269–98.Google Scholar
Finan, Federico, and Schechter, Laura. 2012. Vote Buying and Reciprocity. Econometrica 80, 2: 863–81.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC). 2011. Encuesta Permanente de Hogares. Last Quarter 2011.Google Scholar
Ishii, Mario. 2011. Speech by Mayor Mario Ishii during the Buenos Aires Peronist Party Congress, June 4. Quoted in La Nación (Buenos Aires), June 5.Google Scholar
Kemahlioglu, Ozge. 2012. Agents or Bosses? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics in Argentina and Turkey. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. 2007. Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, and Wilkinson, . Cambridge: Cambridge Univerisity Press. 1–49.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell, and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2011. Self-Enforcing Clientelism. Paper presented at the conference on Clientelism and Electoral Fraud, Juan March Institute, Madrid.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, Sebastian. 2010. Access to Power versus Exercise of Power. Studies in Comparative International Development 45, 3: 334–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot. American Political Science Review 102, 1: 19–31.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, María. 2005. El aparato. Buenos Aires: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Oliveros, Virginia. 2012. Patronage Contracts and Political Competition. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, April 12–15.Google Scholar
Ollier, María Matilde. 2010. Atrapada sin salida. Buenos Aires: UNSAM.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2007. Why Study Vote Buying? In Elections for Sale, ed. Schaffer, . London: Lynne Rienner. 1–16.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. Perverse Accountability: a Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99, 3: 315–25.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2007. Political Clientelism. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 604–27.Google Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2012. Uncertainty, Political Clientelism, and Voter Turnout in Latin America: Why Parties Conduct Rallies in Argentina. Comparative Politics Studies 45, 1: 88–106.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt out of Clientelism. American Journal of Political Science 56, 3: 568–83.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, Rodrigo. 2013. Brokers with Plug In. Documento de Trabajo no. 4. Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigación y Acción Social (CIAS).Google Scholar
Zarazaga, Rodrigo. 2014. Vote Buying and Asymmetric Information. Working Paper 398. Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame. April.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, Rodrigo, and Ronconi, Lucas. 2012. The Tragedy of Clientelism: Opting Children Out. Documento de Trabajo no. 1. Buenos Aires: CIAS.Google Scholar