Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:04:59.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking out is Hard to Do: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in Mexico's One-Party Hegemonic Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joy Langston
Joy Langston*
Affiliation:
Division of Political Studies of the Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas in Mexico City, specializing in the study of party politics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theoretically based on Albert O. Hirschman's Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, this study examines three cases of rupture or exit by Mexican presidential contenders, in 1940, 1952, and 1988, and one “noncase,” in 1999, with a view to how dissidents' strategies shape political institutions. Mexico's PRI-dominated political system depended on its leaders' ability to create an equilibrium based on mutual incentives to remain loyal to the regime.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , Fall 2002 , pp. 61 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acción (Mexico City). 1986a. Political newsletter. No. 42: September 1.Google Scholar
Acción (Mexico City). 1986b. No. 433: November 17.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1987. Contra Contractarianism: Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism. Duke University Papers in International Political Economy no. 42 (October).Google Scholar
Benítez, Fernando. 1983. Lãzaro Cárdenas y la revolutión mexicana. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank. 1964. The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, Michael G., and John, Higley. 1987. Elite Settlements. American Sociological Review 52, 3: 295–307.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1985. The Political Technocrat in Mexico and the Survival of the Political System. Latin American Research Review 20, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1990. The Military. In Prospects for Democracy in Mexico, ed. George, Grayson. New Brunswick: Transaction. 85–91.Google Scholar
Carreño Carlón, José. 1988. Las elecciones de 1988: más allá y más acá del presidencialismo. In México: el reclamo democrático, ed. Rolando Cordera, R. Trejo, and Vega, J. E.. Mexico City: Siglo XXI. 318–50.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel A. 1994. Democracy Within Reason. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and David, Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical functures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, Ariel José. 1985 (1977). México 1940: industrializatíon y crisis política. 5th ed. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1996. Mexican Politics in Transition: The Breakdown of a One-Party Regime. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Correa, Eduardo. 1946. El balance de Avila Camachismo. Mexico City: Author published.Google Scholar
Corriente Democrática (CD). 1986. Documento número uno. In La Corriente Democrática: hablan los protagonistas, ed. de la Vega, Jorge Laso Mexico City: Editorial Posada.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd. 1999. Electoral Federalism or Abdication of Presidential Authority? Gubernatorial Elections in Tabasco. In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico, ed. Wayne, A. Cornelius Eisenstadt, and Jane, Hindley. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Garrido, Luís Javier. 1982. El Partido de la Revolutión Institucionalizada. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Garrido, Luís Javier. 1993. La ruptura: la Corriente Democrática del PRI. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
González Avelar, Manuel. 1996. Former president, National Executive Committee, Pri. Author interview. Mexico City, May 31.Google Scholar
González Casanova, Pablo, ed. 1985. Las elecciones en México. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Granados, Chapa, Miguel, Angel. 1999. [No title.] Reforma (Mexico City). August 29.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Nora. 1982. The Limits of State Autonomy: Post-Revolutionary Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hellman, Judith Adler. 1983. Mexico in Crisis. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Hernández Rodríguez, Rogelio. 1992. La división de la élite política mexicana. In México: auge, crisis y ajuste, trimestre economico no. 73–1, ed. Carlos Bazdresh, N. Bucay, Soledad, Loaeza, and Nora, Lustig. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica. 239–65.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jara, Heriberto. 1940. Letter from Prm Leader, Aguascalientes, to Ignacio García Téllez, Secretario de Gobernación. July 29. Mexico City: Archivo General de la Nación, Secretaría de Gobernación, Box 189, 2/31 l.G(l) 37653.Google Scholar
Jones-Luong, Pauline. 2000. After the Break-up: Institutional Design in Transnational States. Comparative Political Studies 13, 5 (June): 563–93.Google Scholar
Lafornada (Mexico City). 1999 October 3. http:serpiente.dgsca.unam.mxjornadaindex.html.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1990. Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics 23: 1–21.Google Scholar
Kato, Junko. 1998. When the Party Breaks up: Exit and Voice among Japanese Legislators. American Political Science Review 92: 857–70.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Itai, Sened, eds. 1995. Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lerner de Sheinbaum, Bertha, and de Cimet, Susana Ralsky 1976. El poder de los presidentes. Mexico City: Institute) Mexicano de Estudios Políticos.Google Scholar
Lozoya, Emilio. 1989. Cardenismo y henriquismo. In Neo-Cardenismo. De la renovatión política a la ruptura partidista, ed. Carlos, Lugo, Chávez, Cortés. Mexico City: Institute de Proposiciones Estratégicas. 121–34.Google Scholar
Lugo Chávez, Carlos. 1989. La corriente democratizadora del PRI. In Neo-Cardenismo. De la renovatión político a la ruptura partidista, ed. Lugo, Chávez. Mexico City: Institute de Proposiciones Estratégicas. 1–24.Google Scholar
Lustig, Nora. 1998. Mexico: The Remaking of an Economy. 2d ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Luís. 1981. Del cardenismo al avilacamachismo: historia de la revolutión mexicana, 1934–1940. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Meyer, Lorenzo. 1985. La revolutión mexicana y sus elecciones presidenciales, 1911–1940. in González Casanova 1985. 69–100.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1988. The Politics of Structural Choice: toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, Dc, September 1–4.Google Scholar
Molinar, Juan. 1991. El tiempo de legitimidad: elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en México. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar, Juan. 1996. Changing the Balance of Power in a Hegemonic Party System: The Case of Mexico. In Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America, ed. Arend, Lijphart and Carlos, H. Waisman. Boulder: Westview Press. 137–60.Google Scholar
Moreno Collado, Jorge. 1996. Former director-general, Ministry of Gobernación. Author interview. Mexico City, July 11.Google Scholar
Ojeda Paullada, Pedro. 1996. Former president, National Executive Committee, Pri. Author interview. Mexico City, March 19.Google Scholar
Paoli Bolio, Francisco. 1985. Legislatión electoral y proceso político, 1917–1982. in González Casanova 1985. 129–62.Google Scholar
Pellicer, Olga. 1977. La oposición en México: el caso del henriquismo. In Las crisis en el sistema político mexicano. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, 1977. 31–45.Google Scholar
Reyna, J. L. 1985. Las elecciones en el México institucionalizado, 1946–1976. in González Casanova 1985.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Araujo, Octavio. 1974. El henriquismo: última disidencia política organizada en México. Estudios Políticos 3, 4: 123–36.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, David, ed. 1984. The Modern Mexican Military: A Reassessment. Monograph no. 15. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. Transitions to Democracy: toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 2, 3 (April): 337–64.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert. 1964. Mexico's Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, Mónica. 1994. The End of Hegemonic Rule? Political Parties and the Transformation of the Mexican Party System. In Party Politics in an Uncommon Democracy: Political Parties and Elections in Mexico, ed. Neil, Harvey and Serrano, . London: Institute of Latin American Studies. 1–24.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry, Weingast. 1981. Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice. Public Choice 37: 503–19.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Kathleen, Thelen, and Frank, Longstreth, eds. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
El Universal (Mexico City). 1999a August 23. http:www.el-universal.com.mx.Google Scholar
El Universal (Mexico City). 1999b August 25.Google Scholar
El Universal (Mexico City). 1999c September 15.Google Scholar
El Universal (Mexico City). 1999d September 20.Google Scholar
El Universal (Mexico City). 1999e October 19.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. The Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg, Shugart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 225–58.Google Scholar
Zaid, Gabriel. 1988. De los libros alpoder. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar