Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:58:19.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Source Attribution and the Utilization of Obsidian in the Maya Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hattula Moholy-Nagy
Hattula Moholy-Nagy*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania Museum, Mailing address: 1204 Gardner, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4321 (e-mail:[email protected] or [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assignment by instrument of Maya obsidian artifacts to geological sources has demonstrated the presence of several sources and variations in their distribution over time and space. Of special interest is the minor, but long-standing, presence of green and gray obsidian from Central Mexico. More attributions of large, carefully selected samples are necessary to continue the considerable progress already achieved in understanding Maya obsidian procurement and use. However, assignment by visual means is not an appropriate method for the Maya area because of the range of optical characteristics exhibited by gray Guatemalan and Central Mexican obsidians, some of which are common to several geological sources. Moreover, the determination of obsidian sources must not be considered an end in itself. Combining source results with behavioral typology and archaeological data can further our understanding of obsidian procurement and use in past cultural context. Finally, it would be helpful if analysts reported trace element composition in a standardized manner, so that archaeologists can easily compare the results from different laboratories.

La asignación instrumental de los artefactos mayas de obsidiana a fuentes geológicas ha revelado una variabilidad considerable en la distribución de fuentes utilizadas a través del tiempo y su ubicación. De interés especial es la presencia menor pero prolongada de obsidiana verde y gris de los fuentes de México Central. Hay que conseguir más atribuciones de numerosas muestras cuidadosamente escogidas para continuar el progreso considerable hasta ahora logrado. De esta manera podemos entender la obtención y uso maya de la obsidiana. Sin embargo, la asignación de fuentes por medios visuales no es un método apropiado para el área maya debido a la amplia gama de características ópticas mostrada por las fuentes de obsidiana gris de Guatemala y México Central. Además, la identificación de fuentes geológicas de obsidiana no puede ser su propia meta. Hay que combinar datos sobre las fuentes con una tipología de comportamientos de los artefactos y sus contextos arqueológicos para avanzar en entendimiento de las fuentes diferentes en el contexto cultural pasado. Sobre todo, hay que presentar el tipo del artefacto, porque la tipología es la fundación de todos tipos de investigaciones arqueológicas. Finalmente, sería muy útil sí los analistas reportaran la presencia de los elementos trazos en una manera estandardizada para facilitar la comparación de los resultados entre laboratorios diferentes.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 301 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Andrews, Anthony P., Asaro, Frank, Michel, Helen V., Stross, Fred H., and Rivero, Pura Cervera 1989 Obsidian Trade at Isla Cerritos, Yucatán, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:355–363.Google Scholar
Aoyama, Kazuo 1999 Ancient Maya State, Urbanism, Exchange, and Craft Specialization: Chipped Stone Evidence from the Copán Valley and the La Entrada Region, Honduras. University of Pittsburgh Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology 12, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E., Clark, John E., Aoyama, Kazuo, McKillop, Heather I., and Glascock, Michael D. 2000 Determining the Geological Provenance of Obsidian Artifacts from the Maya Region: A Test of the Efficacy of Visual Sourcing. Latin American Antiquity 11:269–282.Google Scholar
Edgar, Carpio R. 1993 Obsidian at Balberta. In The Balberta Project: The Terminal Formative-Early Classic Transition on the Pacific Coast ofGuatemala, by Frederick J. Bove, Sonia Medrano B., Brenda Lou P., and Bárbara Arroyo L., pp. 83–106. University of Pittsburgh Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology 6, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1987 Politics, Prismatic Blades, and Mesoamerican Civilization. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Jay K. Johnson and Carol A. Morrow, pp. 209–284. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1988a Appendix 1: The Chipped Stone Artifacts. Excavations at House 1, Yerba Buena, Chiapas Central Highlands, Mexico by Douglas Donne Bryant. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 54, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1988b The Lithic Artifacts of La Libertad, Chiapas, Mexico. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 52, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Coe, William R. 1958 Piedras Negras Archaeology: Artifacts, Caches, and Burials. The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Dreiss, Meredith L. 1988 Obsidian at Colha, Belize:A Technological Analysis and Distributional Study Based on Trace Element Data. Papers of the Colha Project 4. Jointly published by the Texas Research Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin and the Center for Archaeological Research, University of Texas at San Antonio.Google Scholar
Dreiss, Meredith L., Brown, David O., Hester, Thomas R., Glascock, Michael D., Neff, Hector, and Stryker, Katharine S. 1993 Expanding the Role of Trace-Element Studies:Obsidian Use in the Late and Terminal Classic Periods at the Lowland Maya Site of Colha, Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 4:271–283.Google Scholar
Ford, Anabel, Stross, Fred, Asaro, Frank, and Michel, Helen V. 1997 Obsidian Procurement and Distribution in the Tikal-Yaxha Intersite Area of the Central Maya Lowlands. Ancient Mesoamerica 8:101–110.Google Scholar
Fowler, Jr., William, R., Demarest, Arthur A., Michel, Helen V., Asaro, Frank, and Stross, Fred 1989 Sources of Obsidian from El Mirador, Guatemala: New Evidence on Preclassic Maya Interaction. American Anthropologist 91:158–168.Google Scholar
Graham, John, Hester, Thomas R., and Jack, Robert N. 1972 Sources for the Obsidian at the Ruins of Seibal, Peten, Guatemala. University of California Archaeological Facility Contribution 16, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Guderjan, Thomas H., Garber, James F., Smith, Herman A., Stross, Fred, Michel, Helen V., and Asaro, Frank 1989 Maya Maritime Trade and Sources of Obsidian at San Juan, Ambergris Cay, Belize. Journal of Field Archeology 16:363–369.Google Scholar
Haines, Helen R., Cox, Kim A., and Glascock, Michael D. 2000 Analysis of Obsidian from the Blue Creek Ruin, Orange Walk District, Belize. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hammond, Norman, Neivens, Mary D., and Harbottle, Garman 1984 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from a Classic Maya Residential Group from Nohmul, Belize. American Antiquity 49:815–820.Google Scholar
Hansen, Richard 1990 Excavations in the Tigre Complex, El Mirador, Petén, Guatemala. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 62. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Harbottle, Garman, Neff, Hector, and Bishop, Ronald L. 1994 Appendix C: The Sources of Copan Valley Obsidian in Ceramics and Artifacts from Excavations in the Copan Residential Zone, by Gordon R. Willey, Richard M. Leventhal, Arthur A. Demarest, and William L. Fash, Jr., pp. 445–457. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 80. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Mine, Leah D. 1990 The Spatial Patterning of Aztec Ceramics:Implications for Pre-Hispanic Exchange Systems in the Valley of Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:415–437.Google Scholar
Jackson, Thomas L., and Love, Michael W. 1991 Blade Running: Middle Preclassic Obsidian Exchange and the Introduction of Prismatic Blades at La Blanca, Guatemala. Ancient Mesoamerica 2:47–59.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K. 1976a Chipped Stone Artifacts from the Western Maya Periphery. Unpublished Ph.D.dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K. 1976b Long Distance Obsidian Trade: New Data from the Western Maya Periphery. In Maya Lithic Studies, Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, edited by Thomas R. Hester and Norman Hammond, pp. 83–90. Special Report 4, Center for Archaeological Research, University of Texas at San Antonio.Google Scholar
Matheny, Ray T., L, Deanne, Gurr, Donald W. Forsyth, and Richard Hauck, F. 1983 Investigations at Edzná, Campeche, Mexico Volume 1, Part 2: The Hydraulic System. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 46. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Mine, Leah D. 1994 Political Economy and Market Economy Under Aztec Rule: A Regional Perspective Based on Decorated Ceramic Production and Distribution Systems in the Valley of Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, Hattula 1999 Mexican Obsidian at Tikal, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity 10:300–313.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, Hattula, Asaro, Frank, and Stross, Fred H. 1984 Tikal Obsidian: Sources and Typology. American Antiquity 49:104–117.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, Hattula, and Nelson, Fred W. 1990 New Data on Obsidian Artifacts from Tikal, Guatemala. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:71–80.Google Scholar
Neivens, Mary, Harbottle, Garman, and Kimberlin, Jerome 1983 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from Northern Belize. In Excavations in Northern Belize, Central America, edited by Raymond V. Sidrys, pp. 321–339. Monograph 17, Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Nelson, Fred W. 1983 Appendix A: Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from the Northern Maya Lowlands. In Investigations at Edzná, Campeche, Mexico Volume 1, Part 2: The Hydraulic System, edited by Ray T. Matheny, Deanne L. Gurr, Donald W. Forsyth, and F. Richard Hauck, pp. 204–219. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 46. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Nelson, Fred W. 1988 Appendix 4: Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts. In The Lithic Artifacts of La Libertad, Chiapas, Mexico, by John E. Clark, pp. 271–276. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 52, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Nelson, Fred W. 1997 Memo to John E. Clark and Stephen Houston. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Nelson, Fred W., and Howard, David S. 1986 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from El Mirador, Guatemala. New World Archaeological Foundation Notes 3. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Nelson, Fred W., Sidrys, Raymond V., and Holmes, Richard D. 1978 Trace Element Analysis by X-Ray Fluorescence of Obsidian Artifacts from Guatemala and Belize. In Excavations at Seibal, Department of Peten, Guatemala: Artifacts, by Gordon Willey, pp. 153–161. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 13, No. 1. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence M., Michel, Helen V., Asaro, Frank, and Stross, Fred 1985 Provenience Analysis of Obsidians from the Central Peten Lakes Region, Guatemala. American Antiquity 50:591–604.Google Scholar
Rovner, Irwin 1989 Patrones anómalos en la importación de obsidiana en el centra de las tierras bajas mayas. In La obsidiana en Mesoamérica, edited by Margarita Gaxiola G. and John E. Clark, pp. 368–373. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1972 Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity 37:156–165.Google Scholar
Sheets, Payson D. 1975 Behavioral Analysis and the Structure of a Prehistoric Industry. Current Anthropology 16:369–391.Google Scholar
Sidrys, Raymond V., and Kimberlin, Jerome 1979 Use of Mayan Obsidian Sources through Time: Trace-Element Data from El Balsamo, Guatemala. Journal of Field Archaeology 6:116–122.Google Scholar
Speakman, Robert J., Neff, Hector, Glascock, Michael D., and Higgins, Barry J. 2002 Characterization of Archaeological Materials by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. In Archaeological Chemistry: Materials, Methods, and Meaning, edited by Kathryn A. Jakes, pp. 48–63. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael W. 1996 Commodity or Gift: Teotihuacan Obsidian in the Maya Region. Latin American Antiquity 7:21–39.Google Scholar
Stiver, Laura, Glascock, Michael D., and Neff, Hector 1994 Socioeconomic and Historical Implications of Obsidian Source Analysis from Dos Pilas, Petexbatun Region, Guatemala. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Stross, Fred H., Sheets, Payson D., Asaro, Frank, and Michel, Helen V. 1983 Precise Characterization of Guatemalan Obsidian Sources and Source Determination of Artifacts from Quiriguá, Guatemala. American Antiquity 48:323–346.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Paul 1971 Utilitarian Artifacts of Central Mexico. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 10, edited by Gordon F. Ekholm and Ignacio Bernal, pp. 270–296. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar