Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:18:22.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hydraulic Hypothesis Revisited: Lake Titicaca Basin Raised Fields in Theoretical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles Stanish
Charles Stanish*
Affiliation:
Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological research over several decades has documented extensive areas of relict raised fields throughout the Americas. The existence of huge tracts of fields utilized in a context of complex political evolution has fostered a debate similar to the “hydraulic hypothesis” controversy, originated by Julian Steward and Karl Wittfogel over a generation ago. In this paper I assess recent research and offer a model that is tested with settlement and demographic data from the Juli-Pomata area of Lake Titicaca in southern Peru. The key variables of the model are differential levels of surplus production, the control of domestic labor by elite groups, and opportunistic economic strategies by the elite. The Juli-Pomata data support a causal link between complex political organization and the existence of labor-intensive raised-field systems. The simplistic explanations of the hydraulic hypothesis remain untenable, but I argue that more subtle causal relationships exist between political centralization and agricultural intensification.

Varias décadas de investigaciones arqueológicas han documentado extensas áreas de campos elevados antiguos en toda América. La existencia de estas enormes extensiones de campos elevados utilizados en un contexto de compleja evolución política ha estimulado un debate semejante a la controversia sobre la teoría hidráulica, planteada por Julian Steward y Karl Wittfogel hace más de una generación atrás. Este artículo evalúa la investigación reciente y ofrece un modelo que se prueba con datos de patrón de asentamiento y demografía del área Juli-Pomata a la orilla del lago Titicaca al sur del Perú. Las variables clave del modelo son: los niveles diferenciales de producción de excedentes, el control de trabajo doméstico por grupos de la élite, y las estrategias económicas oportunistas de la élite. Los datos de Juli-Pomata indican una relación causal entre la organización política compleja y la existencia de sistemas de campos elevados de trabajo intensivo. Las explicaciones simplistas de la hipótesis hidráulica continúan sin soporte, pero yo arguyo que existen relaciones causales más sutiles entre la centralización política y la intensificación agrícola.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 312 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, R. McC. 1960 Early Civilizations, Subsistence, and Environment. In City Invincible: A Symposium on Urbanization and Cultural Development in the Ancient Near East, edited by C. H. Kraeling and R. McC. Adams, pp. 269–295. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. 1992 Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California: Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57:60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, D. L. 1986 Management of Agricultural Risk in the Titicaca Basin. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. 1976 Early Hydraulic Civilization in Egypt. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Chibnik, M. 1984 A Cross-cultural Examination of Chayanov’s Theory. Current Anthropology 25:335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, G. 1971 Theoretical Issues in Economic Anthropology. In Economic Development and Social Change, edited by G. Dalton, pp. 178–225. Natural History Press, New York.Google Scholar
D’Altroy, T., and Earle, T. K. 1992 Staple Finance, Wealth Finance, and Storage in the Inka Political Economy. In Inka Storage Systems, edited by T. Y. LeVine, pp. 31–61. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Darch, J. P. (editor) 1983 Drained Field Agriculture in Central and South America. BAR International Series 189. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Vega, E. 1990 Estudio arqueológico de Pucaras o poblados amurallados de cumbre en territorio Lupaqa: El caso de Pucara-Juli. Unpublished Tesis Bachiller, Departamento de Antropología, Universidad Católica Santa Maria, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Denevan, W. 1970 Aboriginal Drained Field Cultivation in the Americas. Science 169:647–654.Google Scholar
Denevan, W. 1982 Hydraulic Agriculture in the American Tropics: Forms, Measures, and Recent Research. In Maya Subsistence, edited by K. Flannery, pp. 181–203. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Denevan, W., and Turner, B. L. II 1974 Forms, Functions and Associations of Raised Fields in the Old World Tropics. Journal of Tropical Geography 39:24–33.Google Scholar
Durrenberger, E. P. (editor) 1984 Chayanov, Peasants, and Economic Anthropology. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1978 Economic and Social Organization of a Complex Chiefdom: The Halelea District, Kauai, Hawaii. Anthropological Papers No. 63. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1987 Specialization and the Production of Wealth: Hawaiian Chiefdoms and Inka Power. In Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, edited by E. M. Brumfiel and T. K. Earle, pp. 64–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. 1985 Applications of Prehistoric Andean Technology: Experiments in Raised Field Agriculture, Huatta, Lake Titicaca 1981–82. In Prehistoric Intensive Agriculture in the Tropics, edited by I. Farrington, pp. 209–232. BAR International Series 359. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. 1987 The Dating of Raised-Field Agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin, Peru. In Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region, edited by W. Denevan, K. Mathewson, and G. Knapp, pp. 373–384. BAR International Series 359. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. 1988 Raised Field Agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin. Expedition 30(3):8–16.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. 1992a Applied Archaeology and Rural Development: Archaeology’s Potential Contribution to the Future. Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society 20(1–2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. 1992b Prehistoric Landscape Management in the Andean Highlands: Raised Field Agriculture and Its Environmental Impact. Population and Environment 13:285–300.Google Scholar
Erickson, C. 1993 The Social Organization of Prehispanic Raised Field Agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin. In Economic Aspects of Water Management in the Prehispanic New World, edited by V. Scarborough and B. Isaac, pp. 367–424. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 7. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Erickson, C, and Candler, K. L. 1989 Raised Fields and Sustainable Agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin. In Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies for Sustainable Development, edited by J. Browder, pp. 230–248. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Garaychochea Z., I. 1987 Agricultural Experiments in Raised Fields in the Titicaca Basin, Peru: Preliminary Considerations. In Pre-Hispanic Agricultural Fields in the Andean Region, edited by W. Denevan, K. Mathewson, and G. Knapp, pp. 385–398. BAR International Series 359. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gilman, A. 1981 The Development of Social Stratification in Bronze Age Europe. Current Anthropology 22:1–24.Google Scholar
Gilman, A. 1987 Unequal Development in Copper Age Iberia. In Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, edited by E. Brumfiel and T. Earle, pp. 22–29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graffam, G. C. 1990 Raised Fields Without Bureaucracy: An Archaeological Examination of Intensive Wetland Cultivation in the Pampa Koani Zone, Lake Titicaca, Bolivia. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
Graffam, G. C. 1992 Beyond State Collapse: Rural History, Raised Fields, and Pastoralism in the South Andes. American Anthropologist 94:882–904.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. Jr. 1976 An Archaeological Investigation of the Lupaqa Kingdom and Its Origins. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., and Earle, T. 1987 The Evolution of Human Societies. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Kolata, A. 1986 The Agricultural Foundations of the Tiwanaku State: A View from the Heartland. American Antiquity 51:748–762.Google Scholar
Kolata, A., and Ortloff, C. 1989 Thermal Analysis of Tiwanaku Raised Field Systems in the Lake Titicaca Basin of Bolivia. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:233–263.Google Scholar
Kolata, A., Rivera, O., and Guzman, J. 1989 Experimental Rehabilitation of Tiwanaku Raised Fields in the Lake Titicaca Basin of Bolivia. In The Archaeology and Paleoecology of Lukurmata, Bolivia. Second Preliminary Report of Proyecto Wila Jawira, edited by A. Kolata, pp. 71–80. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lanning, E. 1967 Peru Before the Incas. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1959 Hydraulic Society in Ceylon. Past and Present 15:2–26.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. J. 1983 Pattern Analysis of Prehispanic Raised Fields of Lake Titicaca, Peru. In Drained Field Agriculture in Central and South America, edited by J. P. Darch, pp. 183–200. BAR International Series 189. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. 1992 Prehispanic Settlement and Agriculture in the Middle Tiwanaku Valley. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. 1973 The Hydraulic Hypothesis: A Reappraisal. Current Anthropology 14:532–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murra, J. V. 1982 The Mit’a Obligations of Ethnic Groups to the Inka state. In The Inca and Aztec States, 1400–1800: Anthropology and History, edited by G. A. Collier, R. I. Rosaldo, and J. D. Wirth. pp. 239–262. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ortloff, C, and Kolata, A. 1989 Hydraulic Analysis of Tiwanaku Aqueduct Structures at Lukurmata and Pajchiri, Bolivia. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:513–535.Google Scholar
Ortloff, C, and Kolata, A. 1993 Climate and Collapse: Agro-ecological Perspectives on the Decline of the Tiwanaku State. Journal of Archaeological Science 20:195–221.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. 1963 Urban Settlements in Ancient Peru. Ñawpa Pacha 1:1–27.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1972 Stone Age Economics. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, C, Denevan, W., and Hamilton, P. 1968 Ancient Ridged Fields in the Region of Lake Titicaca. Geographical Journal 134:353–366.Google Scholar
Stanish, C. 1992 Ancient Andean Political Economy. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Stanish, C, and de la Vega, E. 1994 The Tiwanaku Occupation of the Southwest Titicaca Basin, Peru. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stanish, C, and Steadman, L. 1994 Archaeological Research at the Site of Tumatumani, Juli, Peru. Fieldiana: Anthropology 23.Google Scholar
Stanish, C, de la Vega, E., Steadman, L., Frye, K. L., Chávez Justo, C., Onofre Mamani, L., Seddon, M., and Calisaya Chuquimia, P. 1994 Archaeological Research in the Juli-Desaguadero Region of the Lake Titicaca Basin, Peru. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Steward, J. 1949 Cultural Causality and Law. American Anthropologist 51:1–27.Google Scholar
Steward, J. 1955 Some Implications of the Symposium. In Irrigation Civilizations: A Comparative Study, edited by J. Steward, R. M. Adams, D. Collier, A. Palerm, K. A. Wittfogel, and R. L. Beals, pp. 58–78. Pan American Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Tschopik, H. 1946 The Aymara. In The Andean Civilizations, pp. 501–574. Handbook of South American Indians, vol. 2, edited by J. H. Steward. Bulletin No. 143. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Wachtel, N. 1982 The Mitimas of the Cochabamba Valley: The Colonization Policy of Huayna Capac. In The Inca and Aztec States, 1400–1800: Anthropology and History, edited by G. A. Collier, R. I. Rosaldo, and J. D. Wirth, pp. 199–235. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Webster, G. 1990 Labor Control and Emergent Stratification in Prehistoric Europe. Current Anthropology 31:337–366.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K. 1956 The Hydraulic Civilizations. In Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, edited by W. Thomas, pp. 152–164. Wenner-Gren Foundation, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K. 1957 Oriental Despotism. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K. 1971 Developmental Aspects of Hydraulic Societies. In Prehistoric Agriculture, edited by S. Struever, pp. 557–571. The Natural History Press, Garden City, New York. Reprinted. Originally published 1955, In Irrigation Civilizations: A Comparative Study, edited by J. Steward, R. M. Adams, D. Collier, A. Palerm, K. A. Wittfogel, and R. L. Beals. Pan American Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar