Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:30:07.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperial Needs, Imperial Methods: Chimú Ceramic Manufacturing Process Through CT Scan Analysis of Stirrup-Spout Bottles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Valentine Wauters
Valentine Wauters*
Affiliation:
History, Arts and Archaeology Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stirrup-spout bottle is one of the most representative forms in the Chimú (A.D. 900-1470) ceramic repertoire. I discuss the ceramic assemblage of this coastal culture and describes more precisely the various manufacturing processes of the stirrup-spout bottle. Although molds used to produce these complex vessels are known today, only little information has been published on the various stages involved in their manufacture. My purpose is to contribute to this research using medical imaging computed tomography (CT) scans of intact stirrup-spout vessels. Based on my findings, I propose that changes in the construction of these vessels correlated with a transition in ceramic production to a semi-industrial level during the time of the Chimú Empire.

Resumen

Resumen

La botella de asa estribo es una de las formas más representativa del repertorio cerámico Chimú (900-1470 d.C.). Este artículo aborda el contexto cerámico de esta cultura costera y describe con mayor precisión los diferentes procesos de fabricación de la botella de asa estribo. Mientras que los moldes utilizados para la producción de este tipo de recipiente complejo son conocidos hoy en día, se publica poca información acerca de los detalles de las distintas etapas de su fabricación. El objetivo de este artículo es contribuir a este campo de investigación a través del método del escáner médico de la Tomografía Axial Computarizada (o TAC). Basado en mi investigación, propongo que los cambios en la construcción de estas botellas parecen correlacionarse con una transición en la producción cerámica a un nivel semi-industrial en la época del imperio Chimú.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 238 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, Trevor, and Fell, C. 1995 Analysis of Roman Cremation Vessels by Computerized Tomography. Journal of Archaeological Science 22:609–617.Google Scholar
Applbaum, Nachum, and Applbaum, Yaakov. H. 2005 The Use of Medical Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging in the Study of Ceramic and Clay Archaeological Artifacts from the Ancient Near East. In X-rays for Archaeology, edited by Uda, M., Demortier, Guy, and Nakai, Izumi, pp. 231–245. Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 1999 Advantages and Disadvantages of Vertical-Half- Molding Technology: Implications for Production Organization. In Pottery and People: A Dynamic Interaction, edited by Skibo, James M. and Feinman, Gary M., pp. 59–80. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Bankes, George 1980 Moche Pottery from Peru. British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Bankes, George 1989 Peruvian Pottery. Shire Ethnography: 15. Shire, Bucks, UK.Google Scholar
Bawden, Garth, and Conrad, Geoffrey W. 1982 The Andean Heritage. Masterpieces of Peruvian Art from the Collections of the Peabody Museum. Peabody Museum Press, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Beckett, Ronald G., and Conlogue, Gerald J. 2010 Paleoimaging the External Context. In Paleoimaging: Field Applications for Cultural Remains and Artifacts, edited by Beckett, Ronald G. and Conlogue, Gerald J., pp. 293–310. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Bernier, Hélène 2009 La producción especializada de la cerámica doméstica y ritual Mochica. Estudios Atacameños 37:157–178.Google Scholar
Bouzakis, Konstantinos D., Pantermalis, Dimitris, Efstathiou, Kyriakos, Varitis, Emmanouil, Paradisiadis, George, and Mavroudis, Ioannis 2011 An Investigation of Ceramic Forming Method Using Reverse Engineering Techniques: The Case of Oinochoai from Dion, Macedonia, Greece. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 18:111–124.Google Scholar
Collier, Donald 1955 Cultural Chronology and Change as Reflected in the Ceramics of the Viru¥ Valley, Peru. Fieldiana (Anthropology) 43. Chicago Natural History Museum, Chicago.Google Scholar
Collier, Donald 1959 Pottery Stamping and Molding on the North Coast of Peru. Actas del XXXIII Congreso International de Americanistas, vol. II, pp. 421–431, San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Conlee, Christina A., Dulanto, Jalh, Mackey, Carol J., and Stanish, Charles 2004 Late Prehispanic Sociopolitical Complexity. In Andean Archaeology, edited by Silverman, Helaine, pp. 209–236. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Costin, Cathy L. 2007 Craft Production Systems. In Archaeology at the Millennium: A Sourcebook, edited by Feinman, Gary M. and Douglas Price, T., pp. 273–327. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Della Santa, Elizabeth 1962 La collection des vases Mochicas des musées royaux d’art et d’histoire. Musées royaux d’art et d’histoire, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Digby, Adrian 1948 Radiographic Examinations of Peruvian Pottery Techniques. Actes du XXVIII Congrès International des Américanistes, pp. 605–608. Musée de l’Homme, Paris.Google Scholar
Donnan, Christopher B. 1965 Moche Ceramic Technology. Ñawpa Pacha 3: 115–138.Google Scholar
Donnan, Christopher B. 1992 Ceramics of Ancient Peru. Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Donnan, Christopher B. 1997 A Chimu-Inka Ceramic-Manufacturing Center from the North Coast of Peru. Latin American Antiquity 8(1):30–54.Google Scholar
Donnan, Christopher B. 2004 Moche Portraits from Ancient Peru. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Donnan, Christopher B., and McClelland, Donna 1999 Moche Fineline Painting: its Evolution and its Artists. Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Dunn, Mary E. 1979 Ceramic Depictions of Maize: A Basis for Classification of Prehistoric Races. American Antiquity 44(4):757–774.Google Scholar
Echallier, Jean-Claude 1984 Eléments de Technologie Céramique et D’analyse des Terres Cuites Archéologiques. Documents D’archéologie Méridionale, Série Méthodes et Techniques No. 3. Association pour la Diffusion de L’archéologie Méridionale, Lambesc.Google Scholar
Foster, George M. 1948 Some Implications of Modern Mexican Mold-Made Pottery. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 4(4):356–370.Google Scholar
Ghysels, Marc 2003 CT Scans in Art Work Appraisal. Art Tribal 4:116–131.Google Scholar
Harvig, Lise, and Lynnerup, Niels 2012 Computed Tomography and Computed Radiography of Late Bronze Age Cremation Urns from Denmark: An Interdisciplinary Attempt to Develop Methods Applied in Bioarchaeological Cremation Research. Archaeometry 54(2):369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashida, Frances 1999 Style, Technology, and State Production: Inka Pottery Manufacture in the Leche Valley, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 10(4):337–352.Google Scholar
Heck, J., and Feldmüller, M. 1990 Examen radiologique de céramiques péruviennes anciennes. Electromedica 58(4):140–141.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Sol 1976 Xeroradiography: A New Archaeological Tool. American Antiquity 41(1):106–111.Google Scholar
Jackson, Margaret A. 2008 Moche Art and Visual Culture in Ancient Peru. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Jansen, Roel J., Koens, Hans F. W., Neeft, Cornelis W., and Stoker, Jaap 2001 Scenes from the Past: CT in the Archaeological Study of Ancient Greek Ceramics. Radiographics 21:315–321.Google Scholar
Leonard, A., Hughes, M., Middleton, A., and Schofield, L. 1993 The Making of Aegean Stirrup Jars: Technique, Tradition, and Trade. The Annual of the British School at Athens 88:105–123.Google Scholar
Levine, Abigail R. 2011 Case for Local Ceramic Production in the Jequetepeque Valley During the Late Horizon. In Advances in North Coast Archaeology: State and Empire in the Jequetepeque Valley, edited by Zori, Colleen M. and Johnson, Ilana, pp. 169–177. BAR International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lima, Silvia Cunha 2010 Tecnologia cerámica chimu: estudo arqueométrico da coleção do MAE/USP. Ph.D. dissertation, Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.Google Scholar
Lima, S. C., Rizzutto, M. A., Added, N., Barbosa, M. D. L., Trindade, G.F., Fleming, M. I. D. A. 2011 Pre-Hispanic Ceramics Analyzed Using PIXE and Radiographic Techniques. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269:3025–3031.Google Scholar
Mackey, Carol J. 1987 Chimú Administration in the Provinces. In The Origins and Development of the Andean State, edited by Haas, Jonathan, Pozorski, Shelia, and Pozorski, Thomas, pp. 121–129. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mackey, Carol J. 2000 Los dioses que perdieron los colmillos. In Los dioses del antiguo Perú, edited by Makowski, Krzysztof, pp. 111–157. Banco de Crédito del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Mackey, Carol J. 2004 La ocupación de dos centros administrativos en el valle de Jequetepeque: El Algarrobal de Moro y Farfán. In, edited by Valle, Luis, pp. 75–88. SIAN, Trujillo, Peru.Google Scholar
Mackey, Carol J., and Ulana Klymyshyn, Alexandra M. 1990 The Southern Frontier of the Chimu Empire. In The Northern Dynasties: Kingship and Statecraft in Chimor, edited by Mosley, Michael E. and Cordy-Collins, Alana, pp. 195–225. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Middleton, Andrew 2005 Ceramics. In Radiography of Cultural Material, edited by Lang, Janet and Middleton, Andrew, pp. 76–95. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mowat, Linda 1988 The Chimu Potter: Mass Producer or Master Craftsman? Museum Ethnographers Group Newsletter 22:1–33.Google Scholar
Parsons, Lee A. 1962 An Examination of Four Moche Jars from the Same Mold. American Antiquity 27(4):515–519.Google Scholar
Pavel, Carmen, Constantin, Florin, Suciu, Cosmin, and Bugoi, Roxana 2014 X-ray Tomography Studies of Prehistoric Ceramic Artifacts. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series 27:1460135-1-1460135-8.Google Scholar
Pavel, Carmen, Suciu, Cosmin, Constantin, Florin, and Bugoi, Roxana 2013 X-ray Computed Tomography Investigations of Cucuteni Ceramic Statuettes. Documenta Praehistorica XL(40):323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purini, Sergio 1980a Vases anthropomorphes mochicas des Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire. Corpus Antiquitatum Americanensium, fasc. I, Union académique internationale, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Purini, Sergio 1980b Vases mochicas des Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire. Corpus Antiquitatum Americanensium, fasc. II, Union académique internationale, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Purini, Sergio 1983a Utilisation des rayons-X pour l’observation des traces de fabrication sur cinq vases Mochicas. Bulletin des Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire 54(2):5–20.Google Scholar
Purini, Sergio 1983b La fabrication de vases Mochicas de type B; utilisation des Rayons-X. In Jaarboek 1983, pp. 195– 218. Vlaams Instituut voor Amerikaanse Kulturen Malines.Google Scholar
Purini, Sergio 1985 Construction de trois vases noirs mochicas. Bulletin des Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire 56:95–104.Google Scholar
Robertson, Duncan J. 1997 The Inside Story: Computerised Tomographic Examination of a Middle Bronze Age Cremation Urn From Barton-Under-Needwood, Staffordshire. Assemblage, the Sheffield Graduate Journal of Archaeology 2. http://www.assemblage.group.shef.ac.uk/2/2dunc4.html, accessed on January, 2016Google Scholar
Russell, Glenn S., and Jackson, Margaret 2001 Political Economy and Patronage at Cerro Mayal, Peru. In Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, edited by Pillsbury, Joanne, pp. 159–175. Yale University Press, London.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1956 Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 609, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Shimada, Izumi 1994 Introducción. In Tecnología y organización de la producción de cerámica Prehispánica en los Andes, edited by Shimada, Izumi, pp. 13–31. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Shimada, Izumi, and Wagner, Ursel 2007 A Holistic Approach to Pre-Hispanic Craft Production. In Archaeological Anthropology: Perspectives on Method and Theory, edited by Skibo, James M., Graves, Michael W., and Stark, Miriam T., pp. 163–197. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Sidoroff, Maria-Louise 2005 The Process Behind Form and Decoration: Defining North Coast Ceramic Technological Style, Peru. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Union Institute & University. Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Tello, Julio C. 1938 Arte antiguo peruano. Primera Parte: Tecnologia y morfologia, Inca, vol. II. Museo de Arqueología de la Universidad Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Topic, John R. 1982 Lower-Class Social Economic Organization at Chan Chan. In Chan Chan: Andean Desert City, edited by Moseley, Michael E. and Day, Kent C., pp. 145–175. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Topic, John R. 1990 Craft Production in the Kingdom of Chimor. In The Northern Dynasties: Kingship and Statecraft in Chimor, edited by Mosley, Michael E. and Cordy-Collins, Alana, pp. 145–175. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Topic, John R. 2003 From Stewards to Bureaucrats: Architecture and Information Flow At Chan Chan, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 14(3):243–274.Google Scholar
Topic, Theresa L. 1982 The Early Intermediate Period and Its Legacy. In Chan Chan, Andean Desert City, edited by Moseley, Michael E. and Day, Kent C., pp. 255–284. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Tschauner, Hartmut 2001 Socioeconomic and Political Organization in the Late Prehispanic Lambayeque Sphere, Northern North Coast of Peru. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tschauner, Hartmut 2006 Chimu Craft Specialization and Political Economy: A View from the Provinces. In Andean Archaeology III, edited by Isbell, William H. and Helaine Silverman, pp. 171–196. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Tschauner, Hartmut 2009 “Los olleros no son del Inka”. Especialización artesanal y economía política en los Andes: el caso de los alfereros de la Pampa de Burros. Revista de Antropología 20:261–296.Google Scholar
Tschauner, Hartmut, Vetters, Marianne, Dulanto, Jalh, Saco, Marcelo, and Torre, Carlos Wester La 1994 Un taller alfarero Chimú en el Valle de Lambayeque. In Tecnología y organización de la producción de cerámica Prehispánica en los Andes, edited by Shimada, Izumi, pp. 349–386. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Tschauner, Hartmut and Wagner, Ursel 2003 Pottery from a Chimú Workshop Studied by Mössbauer Spectroscopy. Hyperfine Interactions 150:165–186.Google Scholar
Uceda, Santiago, and Armas, José 1998 An Urban Pottery Workshop at the Site of Moche, North Coast of Peru. In Andean Ceramics: Technology, Organization, and Approaches, edited by Shimada, Izumi, pp. 91–110. MASCA research papers in science and archaeology, supplement to volume 15, Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Vandiver, Pamela B., and Tumosa, Charles S. 1995 Xeroradiographic Imaging. In Science in Archaeology: A Review. American Journal of Archaeology 99(1):121–124.Google Scholar
Wauters, Valentine 2008 Stirrup Spout Bottles from the North Coast of Peru. Analysis by X-rays and Comparative Study. Bulletin des Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire 78:285–319.Google Scholar
Wauters, Valentine 2014 L’analyse de la céramique archéologique via l’imagerie médicale. Etude d’un vase à anse-goulot en étrier mochica (côte Nord du Pérou). Koregos, Revue et Encyclopédie Multimédia des Arts, Reporticle 84. Electronic document. http://www.koregos.org/cgi?lg=fr&pag=1861&tab=317&rec=117&frm=0&par=secorig1803, accessed on January 2016.Google Scholar