Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:17:54.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elemental Analysis of Alkalis and Dental Deposits Associated with Coca Chewing in Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Douglas H. Ubelaker  and
Karen E. Stothert
Douglas H. Ubelaker
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology; Smithsonian Institution; National Museum of Natural History; Washington, D.C. 20560-0112 ([email protected])
Karen E. Stothert
Affiliation:
Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between Andean coca use and dental deposits is explored through the use of scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). Elemental analyses of samples of large dental deposits from archeologically recovered skeletons from Ecuador dating between 500 B.C. and A.D. 1532 are compared with those of normal calculus deposits of individuals from North America (modern and precontact), of normal tooth structure and of samples of alkali recovered from Ecuadorian artifacts thought to have been employed in coca use. Spectral analysis revealed homogeneity among all dental samples (deposits and structure) and that they are distinct from the elemental pattern revealed in the analysis of the artifact alkalis.

La relación entre el uso de la coca en los andes se explora a través de la utilización del microscopio electrónico de barrido/energía dispersiva de rayos equis (SEM/EDS). El análisis de los elementos de las muestras de depósitos dentales grandes que provienen de los esqueletos arqueológicos de Ecuador son comparados con los depósitos normales de cálculos de individuos de Norte América que tienen estructuras dentales normales (modernos y de pre-contacto) con muestras de álcali recuperadas de artefactos ecuatorianos que se relacionan con el uso de la coca. El análisis químico revela homogeneidad entre todas las muestras dentales (depósitos y estructuras) y son distintos de los patrones que se observan en el análisis de los artefactos álcalis.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 77 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Allen, Catherine J. 1981 To Be Quechua: The Symbolism of Coca Chewing in Highland Peru. American Ethnologist 8:157–171.Google Scholar
Allen, Catherine J. 1988 The Hold Life Has: Coca and Cultural Identity in an Andean Community. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Aufderheide, Arthur C. 2003 The Scientific Study of Mummies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boynton, Robert S. 1980 Chemistry and Technology of Lime and Limestone. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Burchard, Roderick E. 1992 Coca Chewing and Diet. Current Anthropology 33:1–24.Google Scholar
Burczynski, F. J., Boni, R. L., Erickson, J., and Vitti, T. G. 1986 Effect of Erythroxylum Coca, Cocaine and Ecgonine Methyl Ester as Dietary Supplements on Energy Metabolism in the Rat. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 16:153–166.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Larry W., Aufderheide, Arthur C., Springfield, Angela, Weems, Cheryl, and Arriaza, Bernardo 1991 The Frequency and Antiquity of Prehistoric Coca-Leaf-Chewing Practices in Northern Chile: Radioimmunoassay of a Cocaine Metabolite in Human-Mummy Hair. Latin American Antiquity 2:260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. 1949 Stimulants and Narcotics. In The Comparative Ethnology of South American Indians, edited by Julian H. Steward, pp. 525–558. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 5, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Dávila Negrón, Luis 1993 Q’eros, Herencia Inca: Testimonio de Expedicione.s Odontológicas. L.Dávila N., El Distribuidor, Cuzco, Perú.Google Scholar
Driessens, F. C. M., and Verbeeck, R. M. H. 1989 Possible Pathways of Mineralization of Dental Plaque. In Recent Advances in the Study of Dental Calculus: Proceedings of a Workshop 6–9 November, 1988 Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, edited by J. M. ten Cate, pp. 7–17. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldman, Henry M. 1942 Periodontia: A Study of the Histology, Physiology, and Pathology of the Periodontium, and the Treatment of Its Diseases. C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Noriega, Carlos, and Wolfgang Von Hagen, Victor 1950 The Strange Case of the Coca Leaf. The Scientific Monthly 70(2):81–89.Google Scholar
Indriati, Etty, and Buikstra, Jane E. 2001 Coca Chewing in Prehistoric Coastal Peru: Dental Evidence. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 114:242–257.Google Scholar
Klepinger, Linda L., Kuhn, John K., and Thomas, Josephus Jr. 1977 Prehistoric Dental Calculus Gives Evidence for Coca in Early Coastal Ecuador. Nature 269(5628):506–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lathrap, Donald W. 1973 The Antiquity and Importance of Long-Distance Trade Relationships in the Moist Tropics of Pre-Columbian South America. World Archaeology 5:170–186.Google Scholar
Lathrap, Donald W. 1975 Ancient Ecuador: Culture, Clay and Creativity 3000–300 B.C. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Leigh, Rufus Wood 1929 Dental Morphology and Pathology of Prehistoric Guam. Memoirs of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum 11:257–272.Google Scholar
Leigh, Rufus Wood 1937 Dental Morphology and Pathology of Pre-Spanish Peru. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 22:267–296.Google Scholar
Lindao Quimí, Roberto, and Stothert, Karen E. 1994 El uso vernáculo de las arholes y plantas en la Península de Santa Elena. Fundación Pro-Pueblo, Cemento Nacional, y Subdirección Programas Culturales, Banco Central del Ecuador, Guayaquil.Google Scholar
Mehta, Fali S., Sanjana, M. K., Barretto, M. A., and Doctor, R. 1955 Relation of Betel Leaf Chewing to Periodontal Disease. The Journal of the American Dental Association 50:531–536.Google Scholar
Miner, Horace 1939 Parallelism in Alkaloid-Alkali Quids. American Anthropologist 41:617–619.Google Scholar
Moodie, Roy L. 1931 Studies in Paleodontology: Excessive Deposits of Salivary Calculus on the Teeth of Pre-Columbian Peruvians. The Pacific Dental Gazette 39:24–29.Google Scholar
Mortimer, William G. 1901 Peru History of Coca: “The Divine Plant” of the Incas. J.H. Vail and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Myers, Thomas P. 1976 Formative Period Occupations in the Highlands of Northern Ecuador. American Antiquity 41:353–360.Google Scholar
Piperno, Dolores R., Hoist, Irene, Ranere, Anthony, Hansell, Patricia, and Stothert, Karen 2001 The Occurrence of Genetically Controlled Phytoliths from Maize Cobs and Starch Grains from Maize Kernels on Archaeological Stone Tools and Human Teeth, and in Archaeological Sediments from Southern Central America and Northern South America. The Phytolitharien 13:1–7.Google Scholar
Plowman, Timothy 1984 The Ethnobotany of Coca (Erythroxylum spp., Erythroxylaceae). In Ethnobotany and the Neotropics, edited by G. T. Prance and J. A. Kallunki, pp. 62–111. Advances in Economic Botany, vol. 1. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.Google Scholar
Plowman, Timothy 1986 Coca Chewing and the Botanical Origins of Coca (Erythroxylum Spp.) in South America. In Coca and Cocaine: Effects on People and Policy in Latin America, edited by Deborah Pacini and Christine Franquemont, pp. 5–33. Cultural Survival Inc. and Latin American Studies Program. Transcript Printing Compay, Peterborough, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Rizzo, A. A., Martin, G. R., Scott, D. B., and Mergenhagen, S. E. 1962 Mineralization of Bacteria. Science 135(3502):439–441.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Ferdinand 1984 Structure of Sub- and Supragingival Dental Calculus in Human Periodontitis: An Electronmicroscopic Study. Journal of Periodontal Research 19:317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand, Harald F. 1949 The Carbonic Acid Content of Saliva and Its Role in the Formation of Dental Calculus. Thronsen & Co. Boktrykkeri, Oslo.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Hubert E. 1969 Formation and Inhibition of Dental Calculus. Hans Huber Publishers, Berne, Vienna.Google Scholar
Stillman, Paul R., and McCall, John O. 1922 A Textbook of Clinical Periodontia: A Study of the Causes and Pathology of Periodontal Disease and a Consideration of Its Treatment. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Stothert, Karen E. 1998 Informe de Rescate en Comuna San Marcos (8/1998). Manuscript on file, Museo Antropológico, Banco Central del Ecuador, and the Sub-Dirección Regional, Instituto Nacional del Patrimonio Cultural, Guayaquil.Google Scholar
Stothert, Karen E. 2002 Fishing, Fish Processing and Trade at the Endangered Mar Bravo Site, Southwest Ecuador. Manuscript on file, FERCO USA.Google Scholar
Stothert, Karen E., Sánchez Mosquera, Amelia, and Veintimilla, César 1998 Intercambio y Productión de Cerámica Durante el Período Guangala Temprano en la Cordillera Colonche-Chongón, Ecuador. In El Area Septentrional Andina: Arqueología y Ethnohistoria, edited by Mercedes Guinea, Jorge Marcos, and Jean-François Bouchard, pp. 197–222. Abya-Yala y IFEA, Quito.Google Scholar
Towle, Margaret A. 1961 The Ethnobotany of Pre-Columbian Peru. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1983 Prehistoric Demography of Coastal Ecuador. National Geographic Society Research Reports 15:695–704.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, Douglas H., Ward, Dennis C., Braz, Valeria S., and Stewart, John. 2002 The Use of SEM/EDS Analysis to Distinguish Dental and Osseus Tissue from Other Materials. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47:940–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, D. J. 1997 Dental Calculus: Recent Insights into Occurrence, Formation, Prevention, Removal and Oral Health Effects of Supragingival and Subgingival Deposits. European Journal of Oral Science 105:508–522.Google Scholar