Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:47:27.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Status and issues in the development of a γ-ray laser. II. Giant resonances for the pumping of nuclei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

C.B. Collins
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688
J.J. Carroll
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688
K.N. Taylor
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688
T.W. Sinor
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688
C. Hong
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688
J.D. Standifird
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688
D.G. Richmond
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083–0688

Abstract

A γ-ray laser would stimulate the emission of radiation of wavelengths below 1 Å from excited states of nuclei. However, the anticipation of a need for high pump powers tended to discourage early research and the difficulties in demonstrating a device were first assumed to be insurmountable. Over the past decade, advances in pulsed-power technology have changed these perceptions and studies have built a strong momentum. A nuclear analog of the ruby laser has been proposed and many of the component steps for pumping the nuclei have been demonstrated experimentally. A quantitative model based upon the new data and concepts has shown the γ-ray laser to be feasible if some real isotope has its properties sufficiently close to the ideals modeled. The greatest positive impact upon feasibility has come from the discovery of giant resonances for pumping nuclei that greatly reduce the levels of pump power needed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J.A. et al. 1988a Phys. Rev. C 38, 2833.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.A. & Collins, C.B. 1987 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.A. & Collins, C.B. 1988b Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, E.C. & Brownson, J. 1967 Nucl. Phys. A 98, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.J. et al. 1989 Astrophys. J. 344, 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.J. et al. 1991a Phys. Rev. C 43, 1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.J. et al. 1991b Phys. Rev. C 43, 879.Google Scholar
Collins, C.B. 1991 Handbook of Laser Science and Technology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), pp. 561567.Google Scholar
Collins, C.B. et al. 1982 J. Appl. Phys. 53, 4645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C.B. et al. 1988b Phys. Rev. C 37, 2267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, B.B. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. C 42, R1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C.B. et al. 1992 Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena, Miley, G.H. and Hora, H., eds. (Plenum, New York) Vol. 10, pp. 151166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File. 1986 Information Analysis Center Report BNL–NC5–51655 (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY).Google Scholar
Girod, M. et al. 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, W.R. et al. 1985 The EGS4 Code System, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Report No. SLAC 265 (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
Neumann-Cosel, P. von et al. 1981 Phys. Lett. B 226, 9.Google Scholar
Walker, P.M. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, W. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar