Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:30:14.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-wavelength-laser requirements for direct-drive ignition and gain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

R.L. McCrory ,
J.M. Soures ,
J.P. Knauer ,
S.A. Letzring ,
F.J. Marshall ,
S. Skupsky ,
W. Seka ,
C.P. Verdon ,
D.K. Bradley  and
R.S. Craxton
...Show all authors
R.L. McCrory
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
J.M. Soures
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
J.P. Knauer
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
S.A. Letzring
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
F.J. Marshall
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
S. Skupsky
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
W. Seka
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
C.P. Verdon
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
D.K. Bradley
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
R.S. Craxton
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
J.A. Delettrez
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
R. Epstein
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
P. Jaanimagi
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
R. Keck
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
T. Kessler
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
H. Kim
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
R.L. Kremens
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
P.W. McKenty
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
R.W. Short
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
B. Yaakobi
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623–1299
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) requires high compression of fusion fuel to densities approaching 1000 times liquid density of deuterium-tritium (D–T) at central temperatures in excess of 5 keV. The goal of ICF is to achieve high gain (of the order of 100 or greater) in the laboratory. To meet this objective with minimum driver energy, a number of central issues must be addressed. Research in ICF with laser drivers has shown the importance of using short wavelength (λ < 0.5 µm). To achieve conditions for high gain at driver energies of a few megajoules or less, high intensities (>1014W/cm2) are required. The directdrive approach to ICF is more energy efficient than indirect drive if the stringent drive symmetry and hydrodynamic stability requirements can be met by a suitable laser irradiation scheme and target design. Experiments carried out at 351 nm on the 2-kJ, 24-beam OMEGA laser system at the Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE) at the University of Rochester, and future experiments to be performed on a 30-kJ upgrade of this laser, can resolve the remaining physics issues for direct drive: (1) energy coupling and transport scaling; (2) irradiation-uniformity requirements for high gain; (3) hydrodynamic stability constraints; and (4) hot-spot and main-fuel-layer physics. We review progress made on achieving uniform drive conditions with the OMEGA system and present results for direct-drive cryogenic-fuel-capsule and CD-shell, “surrogate” cryogenic-capsule implosion experiments that illustrate the constraints imposed by hydrodynamic instabilities and drive uniformity on the design of high-performance direct-drive targets. Target designs have been identified that will explore the ignition-scaling regime using the OMEGA Upgrade. Experiments on the OMEGA Upgrade will signal whether or not there is a high probability of achieving modest to high gain using direct drive on an upgrade of the NOVA facility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 299 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Craxton, R.S., ed. 1989 OMEGA Upgrade Preliminary Design, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Report DOE/DP 40200–101.Google Scholar
Craxton, R.S. et al. 1986 Sci. Am. 255, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haan, S.W. 1989 Phys. Rev. A. 39, 5812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacenjar, S. et al. 1984 Appl. Phys. 56, 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1057.Google Scholar
Kessler, T. et al. 1988 InProceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 1988 Technical Digest Series, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R.C. & Wheeler, J.A. 1981 Nucl. Fusion 21, 389.Google Scholar
Lehmberg, R.H. et al. 1983 Optic Comm. 46, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindl, J.D. 1989 Inertial Confinement Fusion (Editrice Compositori, Bologna), p. 617.Google Scholar
Marshall, F.J. et al. 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40, 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrory, R.L. et al. 1988 Nature 335, 225.Google Scholar
McCrory, R.L. et al. 1989a Inertial Confinement Fusion (Editrice Compositori, Bologna), p. 83.Google Scholar
McCrory, R.L. et al. 1989b Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 31, 1517.Google Scholar
McCrory, R.L. et al. 1989c InProceedings of the 12th International Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research Conference, Nice (IAEA, Vienna), Vol. 3, p. 17.Google Scholar
McCrory, R.L. et al. 1991 Computer Applications in Plasma Science and Engineering (Springer-Verlag, New York), p. 291.Google Scholar
McCrory, R.L. et al. in press In Proceedings of the 13th International Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research Conference, Washington, DC (IAEA, Vienna).Google Scholar
Mckenty, P.W., ed. 1988 LLE Rev. 37, DOE/DP40200–83, 16.Google Scholar
Nakai, S. et al. in press In Proceedings of the 13th International Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research Conference, Washington, DC (IAEA, Vienna).Google Scholar
Sacks, R.A. et al. 1987 Nucl. Fusion 27, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skupsky, S. et al. 1989 J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soures, J.M. et al. 1983 In Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (IEEE, New York), p. 1392.Google Scholar
Storm, E. et al. in press In Proceedings of the 13th International Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research Conference, Washington, DC (IAEA, Vienna).Google Scholar
Tabak, M. et al. 1990 Phys. Fluids B 2, 1007.Google Scholar
Widner, M.M. 1979 Report SAND79–2454.Google Scholar