Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:22:09.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative measurement feasibility for 3D distributions of hydrodynamic quantities in the turbulent mixing zone of two gases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

V.P. Bashurin
Affiliation:
Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Institute of Experimental Physics, Arzamas-16, Nizhegorodsky region, Russia, 607200
V.V. Bashurov
Affiliation:
Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Institute of Experimental Physics, Arzamas-16, Nizhegorodsky region, Russia, 607200
Yu.D. Bogunenko
Affiliation:
Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Institute of Experimental Physics, Arzamas-16, Nizhegorodsky region, Russia, 607200
G.A. Bondarenko
Affiliation:
Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Institute of Experimental Physics, Arzamas-16, Nizhegorodsky region, Russia, 607200
F.A. Pletenev
Affiliation:
Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Institute of Experimental Physics, Arzamas-16, Nizhegorodsky region, Russia, 607200
V.A. Starodubtsev
Affiliation:
Russian Federal Nuclear Center – Institute of Experimental Physics, Arzamas-16, Nizhegorodsky region, Russia, 607200

Abstract

In doing research on the turbulent mixing (TM) of two gases different in density, it is of great interest to study experimentally the 3D density distribution pattern of chemically nonreactive gases in the TM zone. For this purpose, noncontact and, particularly, optical techniques to obtain experimental data may be attractive. This article discusses the possibility of using pulsed laser interferometry in this application. Based on this technique, the experiment should result in the mixture density distribution integrated along the light path. Requirements for high-quality interference patterns have been analyzed in application to typical experimental conditions, to show that they may be produced with specific restrictions set on the mixture constitution. Generally, the TM zone has no symmetry. Therefore, the problem of reconstructing 3D density distributions (TDD) of gases can be solved by sufficiently providing many TM zone integral projections (or aspects). It is technically difficult and expensive to achieve this large number of aspects (N> 10). Therefore, it is essential that a reconstruction method be selected to allow the solution of the problem with the least possible number of aspects. Given that the experiment data are incomplete, the reconstruction methods that are based on the concept of maximum data entropy did well. Information a priori about the solution to be sought for an isobaric gas mixture is that its each constituent has invariable density. Thus, a functional data entropy can be defined that is similar to Fermi gas in statistical physics. An algorithm has been suggested for reconstruction as a modified maximum-bounded entropy procedure (Bashurin et al. 1995). This makes reasonable good reconstruction achievable even with as few aspects as N = 4. Experiments on the study of TM of a propane jet in air using a four-aspects laser interferometer were provided and reconstruction of propane concentration distribution was conducted. The results allow determination of the TM zone spectral characteristics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Althaus, W. et al. 1988 In The International Workshop on the Physics of Compressible Turbulent Mixing, p. 127.Google Scholar
Bashurin, V.P. et al. 1995 In The Proc. of the 5th International Workshop on the Physics of Compressible Turbulent Mixing.Google Scholar
Bellman, S.H. et al. 1971 J. Theor. Biol. 32, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. & Wolf, E. 1968 Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, New York).Google Scholar
Brillouin, L. 1956 Science and Information Theory (Academic Press, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, B.R. & Zoltani, C.K. 1985 Appl. Optics 24, 3993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. et al. 1970 J. Theor. Biol. 29, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. et al. 1975 Sci. Am. 233, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, G.T. ed. 1979 Image Reconstruction from Projections: Implementations and Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin & New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, G.T. 1980 Image Reconstruction from Projections (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
Meshkov, A.E. 1969 Izv. AN SSSR, MZhG 5, 151 (in Russian). [Fluid Dynamics 4, 101 (translated)].Google Scholar
NASA Tech. Trans. F-13 1970, 074.Google Scholar
Mueller, R.K. et al. 1979 Proc. IEEE 67, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radon, J. 1917 Berichte Saechsische Akademie der Wissenschaften 69, 262.Google Scholar
Shannon, C.E. 1948 Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaytsev, S.G. et al. 1993a In The Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on the Physics of Compressible Turbulent Mixings12.xml, Linden, P., Youngs, D., and Dalziel, S., eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), p. 178.Google Scholar
Zaytsev, S.G. et al. 1993a In The Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on the Physics of Compressible Turbulent Mixing, Linden, P., Youngs, D., and Dalziel, S., eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), p. 297.Google Scholar