Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:10:22.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical simulations of laser ablated plumes using Particle-in-Cell (PIC) methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Filippo Genco*
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Under Extreme Environment, School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Ahmed Hassanein
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Under Extreme Environment, School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
*
Address correspondence and reprint request to Filippo Genco, Center for Materials Under Extreme Environment, School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Laser ablation of graphite materials in the presence of an external magnetic field is studied with the use of the newly developed HEIGHTS-PIC particle-in-cell code and compared with both theoretical and experimental results. Carbon plumes behavior controlled by a strong magnetic field is of interest to evaluate the plume shielding effects to protect the original exposed target from further damage and erosion. Since intense power deposition on plasma facing components is expected during Tokamaks loss of plasma confinement events such as disruptions, vertical displacements event, runaway electrons, or during normal operating conditions such as edge-localized modes, it is critical to better understand the evolving target plasma behavior for more accurate prediction of the potential damage created by these high-energetic dumps which may not be easily mitigated without loss of structural and functional performance of the plasma facing components. Numerical experiments have been performed to provide benchmarking conditions for the HEIGHTS-PIC simulation package originally designed to evaluate the erosion of the Tokamak surfaces, splashing of the melted/ablated-vaporized material, and transport into the bulk plasma with consequent plasma contamination. Evolving target plasma temperature and density are calculated and compared with measured reported values available into literature for similar conditions and show good agreement with the HEIGHTS-PIC package predictions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bulgakov, A.V. & Bulgakova, N.M. (1999). Thermal model of pulsed laser ablation under the conditions of formation and heating of a radiation-absorbing plasma. Quant. Electron. 29, 433437.Google Scholar
Bulgakova, N.M. & Bulgakov, A.V. (2001). Pulsed laser ablation of solids: Transition from normal vaporization to phase explosion. Appl. Phys. A 73, 199208.Google Scholar
Bulgakova, N.M., Bulgakov, A.V. & Babich, L.P. (2004). Energy balance of pulsed laser ablation: thermal model revised. Appl. Phys. A 79, 13231326.Google Scholar
Genco, F. & Hassanein, A. (2011). Modeling of damage and lifetime analysis of plasma facing components during plasma instabilities in Tokamaks. Fusion Sci. & Techn. 60, 339343.Google Scholar
Genco, F. & Hassanein, A. (2014). Particle-in-Cell (PIC) methods in predicting materials behavior during high power deposition. Laser Part. Beams. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026303461400007X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harilal, S.S., Bindhu, C.V., Issac, R.C., Nampoori, V.P.N. & Vallabhan, C.P.G. (1997). Electron density & temperature measurements in a laser produced carbon plasma. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 21402146.Google Scholar
Harilal, S.S., Sizyuk, T., Hassanein, A., Campos, D., Hough, P. & Sizyuk, V. (2011). The effect of excitation wavelength on dynamics of laser-produced-plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 063306.Google Scholar
Hassanein, A. & Konkashbaev, I. (1995). Comprehensive model for disruption erosion in a reactor environment. J. Nucl. Mater. 220, 244248.Google Scholar
Hassanein, A. (1994). Plasma disruption modeling and simulation. Fusion Techn. 26, 532539.Google Scholar
Hassanein, A. (1996). Disruption damage to plasma-facing components from various plasma instabilities. Fusion Techn. 30, 713719.Google Scholar
Hassanein, A., Kulcinski, G.L. & Wolfer, W.G. (1981). Vaporization and melting of materials in fusion devices. Nucl. Mater. 103 & 104, 311.Google Scholar
Hassanein, A., Kulcinski, G.L. & Wolfer, W.G. (1982). Dynamics of melting, evaporation, and resolidification of materials exposed to plasma disruptions. J. Nucl. Mater. 111 & 112, 554.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J., Moscicki, T. & Szymanski, Z. (2011). The effect of laser wavelength on heating of ablated carbon plume. Appl. Phys. A 104, 815819.Google Scholar
Malvezzi, A.M. & Bloembergen, N. (1986). Time resolved picosecond optical measurements of laser-excited Graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 146149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neogi, A. & Thareja, R.K. (2001). Laser ablated carbon plume flow dynamics under magnetic field. Appl. Phys. B 72, 231235.Google Scholar
Pathak, K. & Chandy, A. (2009). Laser ablated carbon plume flow dynamics under magnetic field. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 084909.Google Scholar
Semerok, A., Fomichev, S.V., Weulersse, J-M., Brygo, F., Thro, P.Y. & Grisolia, C. (2007). Heating and ablation of Tokamak graphite by pulsed nanoseconds ND-YAG lasers. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 084916.Google Scholar
Sizyuk, V., Hassanein, A. & Sizyuk, T. (2006). Three-dimensional simulation of laser-produced plasma for extreme ultraviolet lithography applications. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 103106Google Scholar