Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:22:58.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Line profile modeling for non-LTE partially ionized plasmas based on average atom model with l–splitting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

T. Nishikawa ,
H. Takabe  and
K. Mima
T. Nishikawa
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
H. Takabe
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
K. Mima
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have developed a new opacity modeling of partially ionized high-Z plasma to solve radiation transport in fluid codes. The average atom model is used to describe the electronic state of the plasma. The electronic state of the plasma is determined by solving the collisional radiative equilibrium model. We have taken into account the electron energy level splitting owing to the difference in the azimuthal quantum number. To model the line groups made of the same electronic transitions from ions indifferent charge states, we used a statistical method and calculated the distribution of the charge states from the averaged electron population in each bound state. By using the new opacity model, we can well reproduce the X-ray spectra from the plasmas. It is found that the Δn = 0 transition can explain the peaked spectra near hv = 300 eV and l–splitted emission of the n = 5–4 transition can explain the flat spectra in the region of hv = 400–800 eV seen in the experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 81 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bethe, H.A. & Salpeter, E.E. 1977 Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms (Plenum Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
Finkenthal, M. 1991 private communication.Google Scholar
Goldstone, P.D. et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 56.Google Scholar
Ito, M. et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. A 35, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodama, R. et al. 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokke, W.A. & Grasberger, W.H. 1977 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL-52276.Google Scholar
More, R.M. 1982 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 27, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, H. et al. 1991 Phys. Rev. A. 43, 3073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, F. 1989 Phys. Scripta 39, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, D.H. et al. 1990 Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 44, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabe, H. 1990 Institute of Laser Engineering Research Report No. ILE9008P.Google Scholar
Takabe, H. et al. 1991 National Institute for Fusion Science Research Report No. NIFS-PROC-9.Google Scholar
Zhang, H.L. et al. 1989 Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 44, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H.L. et al. 1990 Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 44, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar