Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:39:09.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of iodine laser interaction of intensities Iλ2 ~ 1013–1015 Wcm–2μm2 with aluminum targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

W. Mróz ,
P. Parys ,
J. Wolowski ,
E. Woryna ,
B. Králiková ,
J. Krása ,
L. Láska ,
K. Mašek ,
J. Skála  and
K. Rohlena
W. Mróz
Affiliation:
Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology, 00–908 Warsaw 49, 2 Kaliskiego Str., Poland
P. Parys
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 00–908 Warsaw 49, P.O. Box 49, Poland
J. Wolowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 00–908 Warsaw 49, P.O. Box 49, Poland
E. Woryna
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 00–908 Warsaw 49, P.O. Box 49, Poland
B. Králiková
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, 180–40 Prague 8, Na Slovance 2, Czech Republic
J. Krása
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, 180–40 Prague 8, Na Slovance 2, Czech Republic
L. Láska
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, 180–40 Prague 8, Na Slovance 2, Czech Republic
K. Mašek
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, 180–40 Prague 8, Na Slovance 2, Czech Republic
J. Skála
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, 180–40 Prague 8, Na Slovance 2, Czech Republic
K. Rohlena
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, 180–40 Prague 8, Na Slovance 2, Czech Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The results of an experimental investigation of iodine laser interaction with Al targets obtained on the laser system PERUN (λ = 1.315 μm, E < 50 J, τ ∼ 350 ps) by means of corpuscular diagnostics, are presented. Ion velocity distributions, angular distributions, and electron temperature were determined. The plasma electron temperature Te ∼ 550 ± 100 eV was weakly dependent on laser intensity in the range Iλ2 ∼ 1014-1015 Wcm-2 μm2. Maximal velocity (energy) for the Al ions was estimated as V ∼ 9 × 107 cm/s (∼ 110 keV) and the maximal measured charge state was z = 13. It was shown that the diameter of the area emitting high energy ions is a few times larger than the focus diameter (80 μm), which indicates a strong influence of lateral heat transport on plasma parameters. The hot electron temperature Te.h was estimated to be in the range 6–10 keV. On the basis of Langmuir probe measurements, the electron temperature of expanded Al plasma at a distance of about 100 cm was estimated to be Te ∼ 3 eV

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 421 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afanas'ev, Yu.A. et al. 1976 ZhETF 71, 594.Google Scholar
Amad, Z. et al. 1991 Sov. JETF 100, 1140.Google Scholar
Beranek, J. et al. 1992 Laser Particle Beams 10, 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, G.L. 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chvojka, M. et al. 1988 Czech. J. Phys. B38, 1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chvojka, M. et al. 1992 Laser Particle Beams 10, 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, P.M. et al. 1975 Electric Probes in Stationary and Flowing Plasmas: Theory and Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decoste, R. et al. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denus, S. et al. 1977 J. Tech. Phys. 18, 25.Google Scholar
Denus, S. et al. 1986 Laser Particle Beams 4, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrani, S.A. & Bull, R.K. 1987 Nuclear Track Detection. Principles, Methods and Applications (Pergamon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Eidman, K. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. A 30, 2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabro, R.et al. 1981 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No 87047.Google Scholar
Koopman, D.W. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzniecov, H.M. & Raizer, Yu.P. 1965 Zh. Prikladnoj Matematiki and Teoreticheskoj Fiziki 4, 10 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Mróz, W.et al. 1991 Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Interaction Report No 1/91 (Warsaw).Google Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1992a J. Tech. Phys. 33, 331.Google Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1992b Laser Particle Beams 10, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puell, H. 1970 Z. Naturforschung 25a, 1807.Google Scholar
Straton, H.M. 1965 Plasma Diagnostics Techniques (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
Wickens, L.M. et al. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolowski, J. et al. 1985 Trudy FIAN 149, 125 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Woryna, E. 1990 PhD Thesis, WAT, Warsaw (in Polish).Google Scholar