Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:09:55.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hugoniot EOS measurements at Mbar pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

A.M. Evans ,
N.J. Freeman ,
P. Graham ,
C.J. Horsfield ,
S.D. Rothman ,
B.R. Thomas  and
A.J. Tyrrell
A.M. Evans
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
N.J. Freeman
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
P. Graham
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
C.J. Horsfield
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
S.D. Rothman
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
B.R. Thomas
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
A.J. Tyrrell
Affiliation:
AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The AWE HELEN laser is being used to measure high-pressure Hugoniot data by the impedance match method. Indirect drive is used to generate pressures of up to 10 Mbar in the aluminum reference material. We are aiming to measure shock velocities in our targets to ± 1 %, leading to errors in pressure and particle velocity of the order of ±2%. This requires improvements in target fabrication and characterization, streak camera calibration and data analysis, coupled with investigations into shock planarity and attenuation. Our latest results have accuracies of 2–4% in shock velocity but have identified work that should allow us to achieve our intended level of accuracy. Experiments have been done with copper and chlorinated plastic; our results are compared with theory, and, for copper, with U.S. and Russian gas-gun, explosively or nuclear-driven experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 113 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al'tshuler, L.V. et al. 1960 Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 573–597.Google Scholar
Al'tshuler, L.V. et al. 1962 Sov. Phys. JETP 15, 65–74.Google Scholar
Kormer, S.B. et al. 1962 Sov. Phys. JETP 15, 477–488.Google Scholar
Holian, K.S. 1984 T-4 Handbook of Material Properties Data Bases, Vol. lc EOS LA-10160-MS.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A.C. et al. 1991 J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2981–2986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.S. et al. 1992 Rev. Sci. Inst. 63, 4322–4326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nellis, W.J. et al. 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1414–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, A. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2604–2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romain, J.P. et al. 1986 Physica 139 & 140B, 595–598.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.L. 1970 SC-RR-70–28 Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Trunin, R.F. et al. 1969 Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 630–631.Google Scholar
Veeser, L.R. et al. 1979 Appl. Phys. Lett. 35 (10), 761–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya.B. & Raizer, Yu.P. 1967 Physics of Shock Waves and High-temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar