Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:06:26.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The gamma-ray laser—status and issues in 1988

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

C. B. Collins
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688
J. A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688
F. Davanloo
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688
C. D. Eberhard
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688
J. J. Carroll
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688
J. J. Coogan
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688
M. J. Byrd
Affiliation:
Center for Quantum Electronics, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, TX 75083-0688

Abstract

Efforts to demonstrate the feasibility of a gamma-ray laser scored major advances in 1987. Culminating with the successes in optically pumping the first of the 29 actual candidate isomers, priority issues were brought into better focus by the lessons learned from a wealth of new results. Perceptions were advanced so greatly that we must reassess the critical issues for 1988. Only the bottom line remains the same. A gamma-ray laser is feasible if the right combination of energy levels occurs in some real material. The likelihood of this favorable arrangement has been markedly increased by the experimental results to date.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. A., Byrd, M. J. & Collins, C. B. 1988 Phys. Rev. C 38, 2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. A. & Collins, C. B. 1988 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. A. & Collins, C. B. 1987 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, E. C. & Brownson, J. 1967 Nucl. Phys. A98, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, E. 1987 Nucl. Data. Sheets. 52, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brussard, P. J. & Glaudemans, P. W. M. 1977 Shell-Model Applications in Nuclear Spectroscopy (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Ch. 10.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. B. W. 1982 Essays in Nuclear Astrophysics, edited by Barnes, C. A., Clayton, D. D. & Schramm, D. N., (Cambridge Univ. Press., Cambridge) p. 23.Google Scholar
Collins, C. B. et al. 1982 J. Appl. Phys. 53, 4645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. B. 1987a in Center for Quantum Electronics Report *GRL/8602, University of Texas at Dallas (unpublished) pp. 128.Google Scholar
Collins, C. B. 1987b Center for Quantum Electronics Report *GRL/8701 (unpublished), pp. 110.Google Scholar
Collins, C. B. 1987C Center for Quantum Electronics Report *GRL/8601, University of Texas at Dallas (unpublished), pp. 114.Google Scholar
Collins, C. B. et al. 1988a Phys. Rev. C38, 1852.Google Scholar
Collins, C. B. et al. 1988b Phys. Rev. C 37, 2267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeShalft, A.Feshbach, H. 1974 Theoretical Nuclear Physics Vol. I: Nuclear Structure (J. Wiley, New York) Ch. 8, Section 11.Google Scholar
Eberhard, C. D. 1987 in Center for Quantum Electronics Report *GRL/8702, University of Texas at Dallas (unpublished), pp. 89103.Google Scholar
Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Perdrisat, C. F. 1966 Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar