Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:49:49.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy transport experiments at Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

K. A. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
Y. Kato
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
S. Nakai
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
H. Shiraga
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
T. Yabe
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
T. Yamanaka
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
T. Endo
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
R. Kodama
Affiliation:
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.
C. Yamanaka
Affiliation:
Institute for Laser Technology, Suita, Osaka 565 Japan.

Abstract

Emissions from the rear side of the targets were temporally resolved by irradiating an ultraviolet (UV) laser on Al and Au thin targets. A difference was clearly observed between the above two targets. Given the fact that absorbed laser energy is converted with a very high efficiency to soft x-rays in a high Z plasma, a characteristic emission peak only observed for Au targets was attributed to the effect of soft x-ray energy transport. The ablation pressures estimated from the emissions indicate that the pressure scaling for Au is close to the one by x-ray radiation rather than by a UV laser. With soft x-ray irradiation, energy transport in A1 foils was also studied. An ablation pressure was estimated by the shock speed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaterre, P. et al. 1986. Phys. Rev. A, 34, 4184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aritome, H. 1983 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 208, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehly, T. et al. 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottet, F. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duston, F. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. A, 27, 1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, T. et al. 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett., 60, 1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henke, B. C. et al. 1984 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B1, 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, N. et al. 1986. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodama, R. et al. 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 59, 2050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, S. P. et al. 1980 LASL Shock Hugoniot Data (Univ. of California, Berkeley).Google Scholar
McLean, E. A. et al. 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, W. C. et al. 1981 Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, W. C. et al. 1983 Phys. Fluid. 26, 2316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, T. et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36, 3279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, A. et al. 1985 Phys. Fluid. 28, 2915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, H. et al. 1983 Phys. Fluid. 26, 1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltzmann, D. et al. 1987 Phys. Fluid. 30, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiell, G. et al. 1983 Opt. Commun. 46, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yabe, T. et al. 1983 J. J. Appl. Phys. 22, L88.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, A. et al. 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar