Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:18:50.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy Dependency of Proton-Induced Outer-Shell Multiple Ionization for 48Cd and 49In

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Xianming Zhou Open the ORCID record for Xianming Zhou [Opens in a new window] ,
Jing Wei ,
Rui Cheng Open the ORCID record for Rui Cheng [Opens in a new window] ,
Yanhong Chen ,
Yongtao Zhao  and
Xiaoan Zhang
Xianming Zhou*
Affiliation:
Ion Beam and Optical Physics Joint Laboratory of Xianyang Normal University and IMP-CAS, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang 712000, China School of Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Jing Wei
Affiliation:
Ion Beam and Optical Physics Joint Laboratory of Xianyang Normal University and IMP-CAS, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang 712000, China
Rui Cheng*
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Yanhong Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Yongtao Zhao
Affiliation:
School of Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Xiaoan Zhang
Affiliation:
Ion Beam and Optical Physics Joint Laboratory of Xianyang Normal University and IMP-CAS, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang 712000, China Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Xianming Zhou; [email protected]
Rui Cheng; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

L subshell X-rays of 48Cd and 49In have been measured for the impact of protons with energies from 75 to 250 keV. Obviously, it is found that Lγ2 (abbreviation Lγ2,3 for 48Cd and Lγ2,3,4 for 49In) X-ray emission is enhanced in comparison with Lγ1 X-ray emission. The relative intensity ratios of Lγ2 to Lγ1 X-ray are larger than the atomic data and increase with decreasing proton energy. This is caused by the multiple ionization of outer-shell electrons. To verify this explanation, the enhancements for relative intensity ratio of Lι and Lβ2 to Lα X-ray in experiments are discussed, and the direct ionization cross sections of 4d, 5s, and 5p electrons are calculated using BEA theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 2021 , 2021 , e22
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Xianming Zhou et al.

1. Introduction

X-ray emission, an important consequential result from ion-atom collisions, involves several inner-shell processes, from primary inner-shell ionization by the incident ions up to the subsequent vacancy decay, including intrashell transitions. The detailed knowledge of X-ray emission provides important information to understand the charged ion-atom interaction mechanism and to test relevant ionization theories [Reference Miranda, Murillo and Méndez1–Reference Lapicki4]. Furthermore, accurate parameters of X-ray are required for the application of trace element analysis known as particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE), which has application in many fields, such as environmental studies, archaeology, biomedicine, and forensic science [Reference Siddique, Waheed, Daud, Markwitz and Hopke5–Reference Garip8].

Multiple ionization, which means more than one orbital electron is knocked off during ion-atom collisions, can be caused by concurrent direct single ionization or subsequent Coster–Kronig (CK) or Auger transitions. Such action can reduce the screening of nuclear charge and alter the fluorescence yield because of the absence of some outer-shell electrons. Consequently, the blue shift of the X-ray energy may occur, and the relative intensity ratio of the subshell X-ray will be changed. As we all know that such multiple ionization can be induced by heavy ions [Reference Czarnota, Banaś and Berset9–Reference Słabkowska and Polasik12], that has been also tested and verified in our previous work [Reference Zhou, Cheng and Lei13–Reference Zhou, Zhao and Cheng15]. Besides, this can also be produced by relativistic electron impact and is dependent on the incident energy [Reference Hoffmann, Genz, Löw and Richter16–Reference Hoffmann, Brendel and Genz18]. Generally, the ionization produced by high-energy protons is considered to be single ionization, and the corresponding X-ray data are chosen as the standard atomic data. However, recently, it has been found that the multiple ionization can also be produced by low-energy protons, which is not only discussed in our earlier work [Reference Zhou, Cheng and Wang19] but has also been mentioned by other researchers [Reference Cipolla20–Reference Miranda, de Lucio, Téllez and Martı́nez22]. In spite of that, the dependence of multiple ionization on the proton energy is still not clear. Therefore, in this work, such a phenomenon is further investigated, and special attention is devoted to the incident energy dependency. In order to verify such a question clearly, the targets 48Cd and 49In are selected based on their atomic structure, in which the Lγ emission involves the outermost electrons.

1.1. Description of the Experiment

The measurements have been carried out at the 320 kV high-voltage experimental platform at the Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMP, CAS) in Lanzhou, China. More details of the experimental system have been described in the previous work [Reference Zhou, Zhao and Cheng23]. In brief, the protons are produced by the electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) ion source. In order to ensure single collision, the current intensity of the ion beam is regulated and controlled in the magnitude of only few nA. The emitted X-rays are detected by a silicon drift detector (SDD). The SDD is placed at 80 mm far away from the target surface in the chamber and at 135° to the beam direction. The number of incident projectiles, which could not be measured immediately by recording the target current due to the influence of the secondary electron emission, is detected indirectly by the combined use of a penetrable Faraday cup and a common one.

The maximum projected range of the proton in the present work is 1.45 μm and 1.65 μm for Cd and In, respectively. Those are all shorter than the target thickness. The experimental target can be taken as a thick target. The X-ray production cross section can be derived to measure the X-ray yield and the proton’s stopping power [Reference Basbas, brandt and Laubert24]. The principal uncertainties for the experimental data result from the X-ray count statistics 5%, incident ions recording 3%, detector efficiency 10%, solid angle 2%, slope calculation of the experimental yield curve 2%, and stopping power calculation 10%. The maximal uncertainty of the yield is about 12%, that of the ratio of the subshell X-rays is about 14%, and that of X-ray production cross section is about 16%.

2. Results and Discussion

In Figure 1, the typical X-ray emission spectra of 48Cd and 49In produced by proton are presented as a function of the proton energy and well fitted by a nonlinear curve Gaussian fitting program. The structure of the spectra is similar for the two targets under different incident energies as a whole. It mainly consists of six distinct lines which are the L subshell X-rays arising from the relative deexcitation of target atomic L vacancies. The first five transitions are the same for both elements and identified as L ι (3s1/2-2p3/2), Lα 1,2 (3d5/2,3/2-2p3/2), Lβ 1,3,4 (3d3/2-2p1/2, 3p3/2,1/2-2s1/2), Lβ 2,15 (4d5/2,3/2-2p3/2), and Lγ 1 (4d3/2-2p1/2). Due to the difference in the electron configuration for the two elements, there is a small distinction for the sixth line. Electronic configuration of 48Cd atom is 1s22s22p63s23p63d104s24p64d105s2, but that of 49In atom is 1s22s22p63s23p63d104s24p64d105s25p1. Therefore, the last peak is L γ2,3 (4p3/2,1/2-2s1/2) and L γ2,3,4 (4p3/2,1/2/5p1/2-2s1/2) for 48Cd and 49In [Reference Thompson, Attwood and Gullikson25], respectively, and they are abbreviated as “Lγ 2” in order to present the following discussion clearly and briefly.

Figure 1: Characteristic L X-ray spectra of (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In for proton impacting, which are normalized by the counts of Lα X-ray.

One can see in Figure 1 that although the spectrum of the two targets is similar for various proton energies, there is an obvious decrease in the Lγ 2 X-ray emission with increasing incident energy, compared to Lγ 1 X-ray emission. For further quantitative analysis, the relative intensity ratios of Lγ 2 to Lγ 1 X-ray are extracted from the original data after taking into account the detection efficiency of the detector and the self-absorption inside the target material. As shown in Figure 2, the ratios are larger than the theoretical data of single ionization which is calculated based on the ECPSSR theory [Reference Brandt and Lapicki26], and it decreases rapidly and is closer and closer to the atomic data as the proton energy increases, in the present experimental energy region. For example, the enhancement factor, namely, the ratio of the experimental result to the atomic data for Lγ 2/Lγ 1, is about 6 for 48Cd and 7 for 49In at the energy of 100 keV, but those drop approximately to 2 when the energy is 250 keV.

Figure 2: Lγ X-ray relative intensity ratios of (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In for proton impact. Circle dots are the experimental data and dotted lines are the theoretical calculation for the singly ionized atom (atomic data) [Reference Brandt and Lapicki26].

It is proposed that the enhancement effect of Lγ 2 X-ray can be understood by the outer-shell multiple ionization. As mentioned in the Introduction, such multiple ionization can also occur for the impact of lower energy proton, except for the case of highly charged heavy ions. When it takes place, owing to the absence of outer-shell electrons, some of the nonradiative transitions, such as Auger transition, CK transition, and super CK transition, are restrained. Accordingly, the radiative transition probability of the X-ray emission is changed [Reference Czarnota, Banaś and Berset9–Reference Słabkowska and Polasik12]. As a result, the measured relative intensity ratio of subshell X-ray is altered. Figure 3 gives the experimental results of the intensity ratios of Lι and Lβ 2 to Lα X-ray as a function of the proton energy, respectively, which are all larger than the atomic data [Reference Brandt and Lapicki26], decrease with the increase of proton energy, and present a similar trend as that of I(Lγ 2)/I(Lγ 1). Based on that result, an estimation can be deduced that the M and N subshell electrons of 48Cd and 49In are multiply ionized by lower energy proton impacting, as similarly discussed in our previous work [Reference Zhou, Cheng and Wang19].

Figure 3: L-subshell X-ray relative intensity ratios of (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In for proton impact. Circle dots are the experimental data and dotted lines are the theoretical calculation for the singly ionized atom (atomic data) [Reference Brandt and Lapicki26].

Lι and Lα X-rays originate from the main transitions for M1 and M4,5 electrons filling the same lower energy vacancy of L3, respectively. The multiple ionization on M1 subshell can be regarded as to be insignificant compared to that on M4,5 shells because of three main reasons. The first is the large deviation of direct ionization due to the difference in binding energy and electron number between various subshells; for instance, the ionization energy of M1 electrons is about 1.7 times larger than that of M5 for 48Cd element [Reference Crawford, Cohen, Doherty and Atanacio27–Reference Salem, Panossian and Krause29], and the single ionization cross section of M5 electrons is higher than that of M1 by almost one to two orders of magnitude in the present experimental energy region [Reference Brandt and Lapicki26]. The second is the high decay probability of M1 vacancies via CK effects being promoted to higher M subshells. The last one is that the vacancy production in M1 shell by CK rearrangement among the L subshells is energetically forbidden. One assumes that, besides the fluorescence yield, the X-ray emission intensity is proportional to the electronic number in the upper energy shell for filling the identical vacancy. The enhancement of ratios of Lι to Lα to the atomic data in Figure 3 indicates directly the multiple ionization in M4,5 shells, and the diminished trend denotes that the extent of that multiple ionization decreases with the increase of proton energy. For example, the average number of multiple vacancies in M 4,5 shells is estimated using the relationship between the experimental ratios of Lι to Lα and the theoretical values [Reference Cipolla20, Reference Cipolla and Hill21, Reference Larkins30, Reference Ramakrishna, Rao and Raju31]. That is about 5.6 ± 0.8, 5.1 ± 0.7, 4.8 ± 0.7, 4.4 ± 0.6, 3.8 ± 0.5, 4.1 ± 0.6, 4.0 ± 0.6, and 4.1 ± 0.6 for 49Cd and 6.1 ± 0.9, 4.8 ± 0.7, 4.2 ± 0.6, 4.0 ± 0.6, 3.9 ± 0.5, 3.9 ± 0.5, 3.8 ± 0.5, and 3.8 ± 0.5 for 49In, with the proton energy of 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, and 250 keV, respectively.

Lβ 2 and Lα X-rays mainly come from the transitions having the same lower energy level L3 but different upper levels, i.e., N4,5 and M4,5 shells, respectively. When the outer-shell multiple ionization occurs, with the absence of some M and N shell electrons, the Auger transition ratio for filling L3 vacancies will decrease, while the fluorescence yield ω 3 will be enlarged [Reference Czarnota, Banaś and Berset9–Reference Słabkowska and Polasik12, Reference Crawford, Cohen, Doherty and Atanacio27–Reference Salem, Panossian and Krause29]. The Auger transition probability a 3 of L3 vacancies for Cd is almost a factor of 20 and 170 larger than the fluorescence yield of Lα (ω Lα ) and Lβ 2 (ω Lβ2) X-ray, and that factor is about 18 and 149 for In, respectively [Reference Crawford, Cohen, Doherty and Atanacio27–Reference Salem, Panossian and Krause29]. Therefore, ω Lβ2 will have a larger increase than ω Lα ; as a result, the actual emission of Lβ 2 X-ray will present an enlargement compared to that of Lα, namely, the measured relative intensity ratio of Lβ 2 to Lα X-rays is enhanced than the atomic data of the singly ionized atom. Conversely, the results of Lβ 2/Lα in Figure 3 illustrate the multiple ionization of M4,5 and N4,5 shells, and it decreases with the increase of incident energy.

Multiple ionization can be produced by concurrent direct Coulomb ionization, charge transfer, or subsequent excitation by CK and Auger transitions. The cross section for the loss of outer-shell electron due to charge transfer can be calculated on the basis of Oppenheimer–Brinkman–Kramer (OBK) approximation [Reference Nikolaev32–Reference Dewangan and Eichler35]. For 48Cd impacted by proton with energy of 75–250 keV, this cross section is about 1.96 × 10−12∼3.92 × 10−10 barn for N shell and 2.57 × 10−12∼2.01 × 10−10 barn for O shell. For 49In, that is about 8.49 × 10−12∼2.80 × 10−10 barn for N shell and 3.11 × 10−12∼1.43 × 10−10 barn for O shell. That is at least 19 orders of magnitude smaller than the direct ionization cross section. So, the multiple ionization results from charge transfer can be neglected for the present result. If leaving the subsequent excitation by nonradiative transitions and the effect of electron correlation out of account, the multiple ionization probability is positive to the single ionization cross section for the direct Coulomb collision. Single ionization is inversely proportional to the binding energy of the related orbital electrons. Besides, the bounding energy of outer-shell electrons is diminished with ascending energy level. So, in consideration of the above confirmed multiple ionization in M and N shells, it is easy to deduce that the O shell electrons of 48Cd and 49In are also multiply ionized by lower energy protons in the present work. That is just the reason for the enhanced emission of Lγ 2 X-ray as shown in Figures 1 and 2.

In order to further clarify the dwindling trend of the multiple ionization reflected in Figure 2, the direct ionization cross sections of some outermost-shell electrons for 48Cd and 49In are simulated theoretically by binary encounter approximation (BEA) model [Reference McGuire and Richard36], in which the ionization cross section is proportional to the function of the scaled velocity G(V) ( V = v p / v i , where vp is the velocity of the projectile, vi is the velocity of the ionized orbital electron) for a certain collision. Here, the vp of proton is approximately 1.42–3.15 a.u. (a.u. is atomic units), and the vi is about 1.10 and 0.73 a.u. for the 4d and 5s electrons of 48Cd, and that is about 1.28 and 0.82 a.u. for the 4d and 5s electrons of 49In and 0.59 a.u. for the 5p electron of 49In, respectively. V is in the region of about 1.1∼5.3. The G(V) is diminished as a function of V. So, those cross sections decrease with the increase of proton energy as given in Figure 4. Taking into account the positive proportion between the single and multiple ionization, one can deduce easily the decrease of the extent for the multiple ionization from the above calculated result of single ionization, which leads to the change of ratios of Lγ 2 to Lγ 1 X-ray as in Figure 2.

Figure 4: Theoretical (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In outer-shell electrons ionization cross sections induced by proton.

3. Conclusions

The Cd and In L subshell X-ray emission has been investigated for 75–250 keV proton impact. The relative intensity ratios of some L subshell X-rays are analyzed. The ionization cross sections of some outermost shells are simulated theoretically. The results indicate that, besides the L shell single ionization, the M, N, and O shell electrons of the target atoms are also multiply ionized. The multiple ionization is strongly dependent on the collision energy, and the extent of that is decreased with the increase of proton energy, which results in an obvious enhanced emission of Lγ 2 X-ray compared to Lγ 1 and the enlargement of the relative intensity ratios of Lι/Lα and Lβ 2/Lα; however, such enhancement is gradually diminished as a function of incident energy.

Data Availability

The basic data used to support the findings of this study can be found in the figures of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant no. 2017YFA0402300, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11505248, 11775042, 11875096, U1532263, 11605147, and 11775278), Scientific Research Program funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (Grant no. 20JK0975), Scientific Research Plan of Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province (Grant no. 2020JM-624), and Xianyang Normal University Science Foundation (Grant nos. XSYK20009 and XSYK20024). The authors sincerely acknowledge the technical support from the group of 320 kV HCI platform.

References

Miranda, J., Murillo, G., Méndez, B. et al., “Measurement of L X-ray production cross sections by impact of proton beams on Hf, Ir, and Tl,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 316, pp. 113–122, 2013.10.1016/j.nimb.2013.08.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkel, T., Hamza, A. V., Barnes, A. V., and Schneider, D. H., “Interaction of slow, very highly charged ions with surfaces,” Progress in Surface Science, vol. 61, no. 2–4, pp. 23–84, 1999.10.1016/S0079-6816(99)00009-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E., Basbas, G., and McDaniel, F. D., “Nonrelativistic plane-wave born-approximation calculations of direct Coulomb M-subshell ionization by charged particles,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1979.10.1016/0092-640X(79)90036-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapicki, G., “The status of theoretical L-subshell ionization cross sections for protons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 189, no. 1–4, pp. 8–20, 2002.10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00987-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddique, N., Waheed, S., Daud, M., Markwitz, A., and Hopke, P. K., “Air quality study of Islamabad: preliminary results,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. 351–358, 2012.10.1007/s10967-012-1674-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, N. K. and Spyrou, N. M., “Trace elemental analysis of rice grown in two regions of Tanzania,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 79–82, 2009.10.1007/s10967-009-0078-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beasley, D., Gomez-Morilla, I., and Spyrou, N., “Elemental analysis of hair using PIXE-tomography and INAA,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2008.10.1007/s10967-007-0416-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garip, A. İ., “PIXE, particle induced X-ray emission A concise review,” Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol. 22, pp. 183–199, 1998.Google Scholar
Czarnota, M., Banaś, D., Berset, M. et al., “High-resolution X-ray study of the multiple ionization of Pd atoms by fast oxygen ions,” The European Physical Journal D, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 321–324, 2010.10.1140/epjd/e2010-00039-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnota, M., Pajek, M., Banas, D. et al., “Multiple ionization effects in X-ray emission induced by heavy ions,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 36, no. 2b, pp. 546–549, 2006.10.1590/S0103-97332006000400013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapicki, G., RamanaMurty, G. A. V., Naga Raju, G. J. et al., “Effects of multiple ionization and intrashell coupling in L-subshell ionization by heavy ions,” Physical Review A, vol. 70, Article ID 062718, 2004.10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Słabkowska, K. and Polasik, M., “Effect of L- and M-shell ionization on the shapes and parameters of the K X-ray spectra of sulphur,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 205, pp. 123–127, 2003.10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00939-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Cheng, R., Lei, Y. et al., “Ionization of highly charged iodine ions near the Bohr velocity,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 342, pp. 133–136, 2015.10.1016/j.nimb.2014.09.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Cheng, R., Lei, Y. et al., “Ionization of Ar11+ ions during the collisions near the Bohr velocity,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 340, pp. 11–14, 2014.10.1016/j.nimb.2014.07.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., Cheng, R. et al., “L-subshell X-ray intensity ratio of Xenon for 6 MeV Xe20+ impact on selected targets,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 304, pp. 32–35, 2013.10.1016/j.nimb.2013.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D. H. H., Genz, H., Löw, W., and Richter, A., “Z and E dependence and scaling behaviour of the K-shell ionization cross section for relativistic electron impact,” Physics Letters A, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 304–306, 1978.10.1016/0375-9601(78)90711-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genz, H., Hoffmann, D. H. H., Löw, W., and Richter, A., “L-shell ionization by relativistic electrons and energy dependence of the Lβ/Lα branching ratio,” Physics Letters A, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 313–315, 1979.10.1016/0375-9601(79)90543-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D. H. H., Brendel, C., Genz, H. et al., “Inner-shell ionization by relativistic electron impact,” Zeitschrift für Physik A, vol. 293, pp. I87–I201, 1979.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Cheng, R., Wang, Y. et al., “L X-ray production in ionization of 60Nd by 100-250 keV protons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 408, pp. 140–145, 2017.10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, S. J., “L X-ray intensity ratios for proton impact on selected rare-earth elements,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 261, no. 1-2, pp. 153–156, 2007.10.1016/j.nimb.2007.03.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, S. j. and Hill, B. P., “Relative intensities of L X-rays excited by 75–300 keV proton impact on elements with Z = 39–50,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 241, no. 1–4, pp. 129–133, 2005.10.1016/j.nimb.2005.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, J., de Lucio, O. G., Téllez, E. B., and Martı́nez, J. N., “Multiple ionization effects on total L-shell X-ray production cross sections by proton impact,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 257–263, 2004.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2003.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., Cheng, R. et al., “K and L-shell X-ray production cross section for 50–250 keV proton impact on elements with Z = 26–30,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 299, pp. 61–67, 2013.10.1016/j.nimb.2013.01.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbas, G., brandt, W., and Laubert, R., “Universal cross section for K-shell ionization by heavy charged particles. I. Low particle velocities,” Physical Review A, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 983–1001, 1973.10.1103/PhysRevA.7.983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. C., Attwood, D. T., Gullikson, E. M. et al., X-ray Data Book’, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA, 2001, http://xdb.lbl.gov/.Google Scholar
Brandt, W. and Lapicki, G., “Energy-loss effect in inner-shell Coulomb ionization by heavy charged particles,” Physical Review A, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1717–1729, 1981.10.1103/PhysRevA.23.1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J., Cohen, D., Doherty, G., and Atanacio, A., Calculated K, L and M-shell X-ray Line Intensities for Light Ion Impact on Selected Targets from Z = 6 to 100, Institute for Environmental Research, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Sydney, Australia, 2011.Google Scholar
Krause, M. O., “Atomic radiative and radiationless yields for K and L shells,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 307–327, 1979.10.1063/1.555594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salem, S. I., Panossian, S. L., and Krause, R. A., “Experimental K and L relative X-ray emission rates,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 91–109, 1974.10.1016/S0092-640X(74)80017-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, F. P., “Dependence of fluorescence yield on atomic configuration,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. L29–L32, 1971.10.1088/0022-3700/4/5/001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishna, Y., Rao, K. R.., Raju, G. J. N. et al., “L X-ray energy shifts and intensity rations in tantalum with C and N ions—multiple vacancies in M, N and O shells,” Pramana—Journal of Physics, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 685–691, 2002.10.1007/s12043-002-0079-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaev, V. S., “Calculation of the effective cross section for proton charge exchange in collisions with multi-electron atoms,” Soviet Physics JETP, vol. 24, pp. 847–857, 1967.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, V. S., “Calculation of the effective cross section for proton charge exchange in collisions with multi-electron atoms,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 51, pp. 1263–1280, 1966.Google Scholar
Lapicki, G. and McDaniel, F. D., “Electron capture from K shells by fully stripped ions,” Physical Review A, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1896–1905, 1980.10.1103/PhysRevA.22.1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewangan, D. P. and Eichler, J., “Charge exchange in energetic ion-atom collisions,” Physics Reports, vol. 247, no. 2-4, pp. 59–219, 1994.10.1016/0370-1573(94)90012-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. H. and Richard, P., “Procedure for computing cross section for single and multiple ionization of atoms in the binary-encounter approximation by the impact of heavy charged particles,” Physical Review A, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1374–1384, 1973.10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1: Characteristic L X-ray spectra of (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In for proton impacting, which are normalized by the counts of Lα X-ray.

Figure 1

Figure 2: Lγ X-ray relative intensity ratios of (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In for proton impact. Circle dots are the experimental data and dotted lines are the theoretical calculation for the singly ionized atom (atomic data) [26].

Figure 2

Figure 3: L-subshell X-ray relative intensity ratios of (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In for proton impact. Circle dots are the experimental data and dotted lines are the theoretical calculation for the singly ionized atom (atomic data) [26].

Figure 3

Figure 4: Theoretical (a) 48Cd and (b) 49In outer-shell electrons ionization cross sections induced by proton.