Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T22:36:25.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffraction and transport in dense plasmas: Especially liquid metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

N. H. March  and
M. P. Tosi
N. H. March
Affiliation:
Oxford University, Oxford, England
M. P. Tosi
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia and Classe di Scienze, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent computer experiments on liquid Mg and Bi (and also on dense hydrogen) have focussed anew on issues involving static and dynamical structure in plasmas. In Mg and Bi, under normal liquid metal conditions, separation of core and valence electrons is valuable both for thermodynamics and in interpreting diffraction experiments. Mg is considered in some detail as a specific example where there is weak electron–ion interaction. Finally, dynamical structure is considered. After a brief summary relating back to the electron–electron pair correlation contribution in X-ray scattering, attention is next focussed on the (longitudinal) viscosity of alkali metals via the Kubo formula. This viscosity is shown to be dominated by ion–ion interactions. Nevertheless, an intimate relation at the melting point is exposed between shear viscosity, thermal conductivity, and electrical resistivity, the latter two transport coefficients being dominated by electrons.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 16 , Issue 1: Special Issue: 24th ECLIM , March 1998 , pp. 71 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, E.N.Da, C. 1934 Philos. Mag. 17, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, N.W. 1968 J. Phys. C 1, 232.Google Scholar
Baym, G. 1964 Phys. Rev. 135, A1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.C. & March, N.H. 1968 Phys. Chem. Liquids 1, 141.Google Scholar
Chihara, J. 1973 The Properties of Liquid Metals, Takeuchi, S., ed. (Taylor and Francis: London), p. 137.Google Scholar
Chiofalo, M.L. et al. 1994 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 8, 1207.Google Scholar
de Wijs, G.A. et al. 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4480.Google Scholar
Egelstaff, P.A. et al. 1974 Canad. J. Phys. 52, 1651.Google Scholar
Faber, T.E. 1972 An Introduction to the Theory of Liquid Metals (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
Greenfield, A.J. et al. 1971 Phys. Rev. A 4, 1607.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.D. & March, N.H. 1963 Phys. Lett. 3, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.W. et al. 1994 Philos. Mag. B69, 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloss, A. et al. 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54, 5851.Google Scholar
Krishnan, K.S. & Bhatia, A.B. 1945 Nature 156, 503.Google Scholar
Macro, W.R. et al. 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1240.Google Scholar
March, N.H. & Tosi, M.P. 1984 Coulomb Liquids (Academic Press: New York).Google Scholar
March, N.H. & Tosi, M.P. 1996 N. Cimento D 18, 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, N.H. & Tosi, M.P. 1997 Phys. Chem. Liquids 35, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, N.H. et al. 1973 J. Phys. C 6, L59.Google Scholar
Pastore, G. et al. 1981 Physica 111 B, 283.Google Scholar
Perrot, F. & March, N.H. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41, 4521.Google Scholar
Rasolt, M. 1985 Phys. Rev. B 31, 1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reatto, L. 1988 Philos. Mag. A 58, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sittig, M. 1956 Sodium: Its Manufacture, Properties and Uses (American Chemical Society Monograph Series, Reinhold Publishing: New York).Google Scholar
Stoddart, J.C. et al. 1969 Phys. Rev. 186, 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, S. 1987 Canad. J. Phys. 65, 288.Google Scholar
Tosi, M.P. 1992 N. Cimento 14 D, 559.Google Scholar
Watabe, M. & Hasegawa, M. 1973 The Properties of Liquid Metals, Takeuchi, S., ed. (Taylor and Francis: London), p. 133.Google Scholar
Ziman, J.M. 1961 Philos. Mag. 6, 1013.Google Scholar