Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:07:56.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corpuscular diagnostics and processing methods applied in investigations of laser-produced plasma as a source of highly ionized ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

E. Woryna ,
P. Parys ,
J. Wołowski  and
W. Mróz†
E. Woryna
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 23 Hery St., P.O. Box 49, 00–908 Warsaw, Poland
P. Parys
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 23 Hery St., P.O. Box 49, 00–908 Warsaw, Poland
J. Wołowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 23 Hery St., P.O. Box 49, 00–908 Warsaw, Poland
W. Mróz†
Affiliation:
Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology, 00–908 Warsaw, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents a set of complementary corpuscular diagnostics applied in experiments for investigation of laser-produced plasma as a source of ions. The measuring possibilities and methods for processing experimental data of a cylindrical electrostatic ion energy analyzer, a Thomson parabola ion analyzer, various types of electrostatic probes, a detector of neutral atom fluxes, as well as methods for visualization of ion emission areas are discussed. Special attention was focused on the ion-induced secondary electron emission problem and its influence on the accuracy of the measurements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 293 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

REFERENCES

Afanas'ev, V.P. & Yavor, S.Ya. 1978 Elektrostatitcheskie Energoanalizatory dla Putchkov Zarazhennych Tchastits (Nauka, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Amdidouche, Y. et al. 1992 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arifov, U.A. et al. 1973 Sov. J. Tech. Phys. 53, 375.Google Scholar
Aumayr, F. et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baklitskii, B.E. & Parilis, E.S. 1972 Radiat. Eff. 12, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldis, H.A. et al. 1991 Handbook of Plasma Physics, Vol. 3, Rubenchik, A. and Witkowski, S., eds. (North-Holland Publishers, Amsterdam-London-New York-Tokyo), p. 435.Google Scholar
Barabash, L.Z. et al. 1989 Sov. J. Atom. Energy 66, 107.Google Scholar
Barnett, C.F. & Ray, J.A. 1972 Nuclear Fusion 12, 65.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, W.E. & Hubert, W.K. 1976 J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 9, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begrambekov, L.B. et al. 1969 Sov. Plasma Phys. 2, 42.Google Scholar
Billinge, R. et al. 1990 Report CERN 90–01, Geneva.Google Scholar
Bocher, J.L. 1978 Optics Comm. 24, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braams, C.M. 1964 Nucl. lustrum. Methods 26, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busquet, M. 1982 Phys. Rev. A 25, 2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykovskii, Yu.A. & Nevolin, V.N. 1985 Lazernaja Mass-spektrometria (Energoatomizdat, Moscow)(in Russian).Google Scholar
Cano, G.L. 1973. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C.T. et al. 1977 Plasma Phys. 19, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charatis, G. 1975 Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Vol. 2 (IAEA, Vienna), p. 317.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S.S. et al. 1980 J. Phys. E: Instrum. 13, 1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, P.M. et al. 1975 Electric Probes in Stationary and Flowing Plasmas: Theory and Application (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chvojka, M. et al. 1994 Czech. J. Phys. 44, 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decoste, R. et al. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decoste, R. & Ripin, B.H. 1977 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 48, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denus, S. et al. 1977 J. Tech. Phys. 18, 25.Google Scholar
Denus, S. et al. 1986 Laser Part. Beam 4, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, L.A. & Sheffield, J.C. 1975 J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehler, W. et al. 1980 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13, L29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidmann, K. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. A. 30(5), 2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidmann, K. et al. 1900 Phys. Fluids B2(1), 208.Google Scholar
Farny, J. 1979 IPPLM Report No. 11/79/11, Warsaw (in Polish).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farny, J. & Woryna, E. 1987 IPPLM Report No. 3/87; 18th European Conference on Laser Inter-, action with Matter, 4–8 May, Prague, Czechoslovakia.Google Scholar
Fehn, U. 1976 Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 21, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischmann, H.H. et al. 1965 Nucl. Fusion 5, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goforth, R.R. 1976 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsack, T.J. et al. 1982 Optics Comm. 42, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gorkom, M. & Glick, R.E. 1970 Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 4, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.S. 1970 Plasma Phys. 12, 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grun, J. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 3390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P.D. et al. 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34, 4103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusinov, M.A. et al. 1978 Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, H.D. 1953a Phys. Rev. 89, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, H.D. 1953b Phys. Rev. 91, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrum, H.D. 1954 Phys. Rev. 96, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankelmann, T. et al. 1992 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 2828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haseroth, H.et al. (in this issue).Google Scholar
Haseroth, H. & Hora, H. 1993 Advances of Accelerator Physics and Technologies, Scopper, H., ed. (World Scientific, Singapore), p. 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haseroth, H. et al. 1995 Laser Interaction with Matter, Proc. 23rd European Conference, Rose, S.J., ed., St. John's College, Oxford, U.K., 19–23 September, Institute of Physics Conference Series Number 140, (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia), p. 293.Google Scholar
Hasselkamp, D. et al. 1981 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 180, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herold, H. et al. 1981 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higatsberger, M.J. et al. 1954 J. Appl. Phys. 25, 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoegy, W.R. & Wharton, L.E. 1973 J Appl. Phys. 44, 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichimaru, S. 1982 Rev. Modern Phys. 54, 1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionov, I.I. 1964 Sov. J. Tech. Phys. 34, 669.Google Scholar
Joshi, C. et al. 1979 Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, J.C. et al. 1985 J. Appl. Phys. 58, 4736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, D.A. 1995 Physics with Multiply Charged Jons, Liesen, D., ed., NATO ASI Series, Series B: Physics Vol. 348 (Plenum Press, New York), p. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, D.W. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlov, I.G. 1971 Metody Energeticheskogo Analiza Elektronnych Potokov (Atomizdat, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kozlov, O.V. 1969 Elektricheskii Zond v Plazmie (Atomizdat, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kozochkin, S.M.et al. 1993 Kurchatov Institute Report IEA-5635/7 (Moscow).Google Scholar
Kruer, W.L. 1988 The Physics of Laser Plasma Interaction, Frontiers in Physics, Vol. 73 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
Kurz, H. et al. 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. A 48, 2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. et al. 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49, 4693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutner, V.B. et al. 1992 Rev. Sci. Intrum. 63, 2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lao, R.C. et al. 1972 Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 10, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Láska, L. et al. 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Láska, L. et al. 1995 6th International Conference on Ion Sources ICIS'95, Contribution No. BO8SI, 10–16 09, Whistler, B.C.Google Scholar
Lewis, C.L.S. et al. 1982 J.Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 15, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, G.D. & Carlston, C.E. 1963 Phys. Rev. 129, 2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, E.W. 1964 Collision Phenomena in Ionized Gases (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney).Google Scholar
Makarov, K.N. et al. 1994 ZhETF 106, 1649 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1989 Laser Part. Beam 7, 3.Google Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1992a Laser Part. Beam 10, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1992b J. Tech. Phys. 33, 67.Google Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1994a Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mróz, W. et al. 1994b Laser Part. Beam 12, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.N. et al. 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44, 2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parilis, E.S. & Kishinevskii, L.M. 1960 Sov. Phys.-Solid State 3, 1219.Google Scholar
Parker, J.H. 1954 Phys. Rev. 93, 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parys, P. et al. 1995a Laser Interaction with Matter, Proc. 23rd European Conference, Rose, S.J., ed., St. John's College, Oxford, U.K., 19–23 September, Institute of Physics Conference Series Number 140 (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia), p. 371.Google Scholar
Parys, P. et al. 1995b Laser Interaction with Matter, Proc. 23rd European Conference, Rose, S.J., ed., St. John's College, Oxford, U.K., 19–23 September, Institute of Physics Conference Series Number 140 (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia), p. 375.Google Scholar
Pearlman, J.S. 1977 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 48, 1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelah, I. 1976 Phys. Lett. 59A, 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, A. et al. 1980 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 51(3), 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripin, B.H. et al. 1980 Phys. Fluids 23, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadowski, M. et al. 1976 J. Tech. Phys. 17(3), 315.Google Scholar
Sarraf, S. & Woodall, D.M. 1978 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 49, 1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, B.L. et al. 1966 Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, Vol. 1 (Beograd), p. 170.Google Scholar
Segall, S.B. & Koopman, D.W. 1973 Phys. Fluids 16, 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkov, B.Yu. et al. 1992 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 28, 2841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, J.W. & Barnes, W.S. 1972. Laser Interact. 1, 307.Google Scholar
Sigel, R. et al. 1990 Phys. Fluids B2(1), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, D.C. 1978 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 49, 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallents, G.J. 1978 J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 11, 769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J.J. 1911 Philos. Mag. 21, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, T.A. & Anno, J.N. 1977 J. Appl. Phys. 48, 1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. et al. 1986 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, L.M. & Allen, J.E. 1981 Phys. Fluids 24, 1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolowski, J. et al. 1985 Trudy FIAN 149, 125 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Woryna, E. et al. 1995 Laser Interaction with Matter, Proc. 23rd European Conference, Rose, S.J., ed., St. John's College, Oxford, U.K., 19–23 September, Institute of Physics Conference Series Number 140 (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia), p. 463.Google Scholar