Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T12:06:36.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Areal density diagnostics using suprathermal fusion reaction for laser-imploded D-T pellets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Y. Tabaru
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan
Y. Nakao
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan
H. Nakashima
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Conversion Engineering, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816, Japan
K. Kudo
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan

Abstract

Detecting highly energetic neutrons produced by suprathermal fusion reactions is expected as a useful method for the areal density diagnosis in future ICF experiments. This paper examines the possibility of ρR diagnosis using suprathermal fusions, on the basis of transport calculations for neutrons and charged particles. Not only neutron elastic scattering but also nuclear elastic scattering of α-particles are considered as the processes producing energetic recoil ions. Since the suprathermal fusion reaction is affected by the plasma temperature through the slowing-down process of energetic α-particles and recoil ions, the yield ratio of highly energetic neutrons emitted from suprathermal fusions to total ones depends considerably on tne temperature. An areal density diagnostic method based on neutron spectroscopy is proposed here that can eliminate the influence of the plasma temperature on the determination of the areal density. Moreover, on the basis of coupled transport/hydrodynamic calculation, we derive a more realistic energy spectrum of neutrons escaping from laser-imploded D-T pellet and examine the usefulness of the diagnosis method proposed in this paper. It is shown that the Method proposed here may be useful for the areal density diagnosis in the ignition-grade ICF Pellets.

Type
Regular Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azechi, H. et al. 1986 Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azechi, H. et al. 1991 Laser and Particle Beams 9, 119.Google Scholar
Blue, T.E. & Harris, D.B. 1981 Nucl. Sci Eng. 77, 463.Google Scholar
Brysk, H. 1973 Plasma Phys. 15 611.Google Scholar
Cable, M.D. & Hatchett, S.P. 1987 J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, J.P. et al. 1974 Comput. Phys. Commun. 7, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duane, B.H. 1972 BNWL-1685, Richmond, WA.Google Scholar
Lane, S.M. et al. 1985 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, No. UCRL-50021–84, pp. 561.Google Scholar
Nakaishi, H. et al. 1989 Appl Phys. Lett. 54, 1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakao, Y. et al. 1991 Fusion Technol. 20, 824.Google Scholar
Nakao, Y. et al. 1993, J. Nucl Sci. Technol 30, 18.Google Scholar
Perkins, S.T. & Cullen, D.E. 1981 Nucl Sci. Eng. 77, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seagrave, J.D. et al. 1972 Ann. Phys. 74, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soures, J.M. et al. 1996 Phys. Plasmas 3, 2108.Google Scholar
Tabaru, Y. et al. 1995 J. Nucl Sci. Technol. 32, 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabe, H. & Mima, K. 1987 Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University Research Report ILE-8713P.Google Scholar
Welch, D.R. et al. 1988 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wienke, B.R. 1974 Phys. Fluids 17, 1135.Google Scholar