Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:48:42.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solid antimatter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. M. Michaelis
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, OX11 0QX
R. Bingham
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, OX11 0QX

Abstract

The problems of creating solid antimatter are listed and examined. Laser driven accelerators may reduce the technological and financial magnitude of the task.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashkin, A. & Dziedzic, J. M. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, M. K. 1976 UKAEA Culham CTO/1176 (Translation of Braunbek 1939).Google Scholar
Bingham, R., Cairns, R. A.Dangor, A. E., Evans, R. C. & McKinstrie, C. J. 1986 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 28, 11, 1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, K., Egger, H., Luk, T. S., Panner, H. & Rhjodes, C. K. 1984 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B1, 1, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunbek, W., 1939 Z. für Phys. 112, 764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budker, C. I., Dikansky, N. S., Kudelainen, V. I., Meshkov, I. N., Parchomchuk, V. V., Petrikov, D. V., Skerinsky, A. N. & Sukhina, B. N., 1976 Part. Accel. 7, 197.Google Scholar
Earnshaw, A. 1842 Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 7, 97.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, N. A., Martin, F., Bordeur, P., Heighway, E. A., Matte, J. P., Pepin, H. & Lavigne, P. 1986 Proc. Linear. Acc. Conf. Stanford.Google Scholar
Ertmer, W., Blatt, R., Hall, J. L. & Zhu, M. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forward, R. L. 1980 AIAA Paper 80–0823. Global Technology 2000.Google Scholar
Forward, R. L., 1982 J. Brit. Interplanetary Soc. 35, 391.Google Scholar
Gastaldi, V. & Klapisch, R. 1983Physics at LEAR with Low Energy Cooled Antiprotons”. Plenum.Google Scholar
Goldman, F. & Nieto, M. M., 1985 Los Alamos Rep. LA–UR85–1092 Proc. 3d LEAR Workshop.Google Scholar
Hecht, J. 1985 New Sci. 24 Oct, 27.Google Scholar
Joshi, C. & Katsouleas, T., 1985 “Laser Accel. of Particles” AIP Conf. Proc. No. 130.Google Scholar
Lawson, J. D. 1959 J. Nucl. En Part C. Plasma Phys. 1, 31.Google Scholar
Michaelis, M. M. & Rumsby, P. T. 1974 Phys. Lett. 49A, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, M. M. 1985 Am. J. Phys. 53, 11, 1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdall, A. L., Prodan, J. V., Phillips, W. D., Bergeman, T. H. & Metcalf, H. J. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulliken, R. S. & Ertmer, W. C. 1971Diatomic Molecules. Results of Initio CalculationsAcad Press ISBN–0–12–5107–50–1.Google Scholar
Mulliken, R. S. & Ertmer, W. C., 1981Polyatomic Molecules. Results of Ab Initio CalculationsAcad Press ISBN–0–12–509860–2X.Google Scholar
Neumann, R., Poth, H., Winnacker, A. & Wolf, A. 1983 Z. für Phys. A. Atoms and Nuclei 313, 252.Google Scholar
Prodan, J., Migdaix, A., Phillips, W. D., So, I., Metcalf, H. & Dalibard, J. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett 54, 992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, N. K. & Guidotti, C. 1982Photon Assisted Collisions and Related TopicsHarwood Acad. Publ. ISBN 3–7186–0130–3.Google Scholar
Scwarzschild, B. M. 1980 Physics Today, June 18.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. R. 1984 The Principles of Nonlinear Optics, Wiley.Google Scholar
Silvera, I. F. 1980 Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, C. 1986 New Sci. 10 April 28.Google Scholar
Wing, W. 1984 Prog. Qu. Electron 8, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar