Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:37:43.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospects for high-power KrF lasers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. J. Shaw
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Laser Division, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon 0xon OQX, United Kingdom

Abstract

This paper reviews the current status of high-power KrF lasers and considers their prospects for future development. The main laser requirements imposed by target physics considerations are identified and KrF lasers are shown to be uniquely capable of satisfying them. Some design considerations are given for (a) ultrashort-pulse high-power systems, (b) high-power coherent beam generation using Raman amplifiers, and (c) incoherent beam amplification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerhalt, J. R. 1989 LANL Report No. LAUR892675, Vol. II.Google Scholar
Barr, J. R. M. et al. 1988a Opt. Commun. 66, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, J. R. M. et al. 1988b Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 874, 60.Google Scholar
Drake, R. P. 1988 Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 12, 181.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. B. et al. 1983 In Excimer Lasers–1983, edited by Rhodes, C. K. & Egger, H. (American Institute of Physics, New York), pp. 5965.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. B., O'Neill, F. & Shaw, M. J. 1985 J. Phys. E. 18, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, J. J. & Brau, C. A. 1975 Appl. Phys. Lett. 27, 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, J. J. et al. 1979 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-15, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, E. C. & Shaw, M. J. 1991 Laser Part. Beams (accepted).Google Scholar
Henesian, M. A., Swift, C. D. & Murray, J. R. 1985 Opt. Lett. 10, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, G. J. et al. 1989 Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, G. J. & Shaw, M. J. 1991 Appl. Phys.B (accepted).Google Scholar
Key, M. H. et al. 1989 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Report No. RAL–89–133.Google Scholar
Kidder, R. E. 1974 Nucl. Fusion 14, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, W. D. & Salesky, E. T. 1985 In Proceedings of the International Conference on Lasers '85 (Society for Optical & Quantum Electronics), p. 417.Google Scholar
Kruer, W. L. 1981 Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 6, 167.Google Scholar
Lehmberg, R. H. & Goldhar, J. 1987 Fusion Technol. 11, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. E. & Milam, D. 1982 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE–18, 1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. et al. 1985 Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishioka, H. et al. 1989 Opt. Lett. 14, 692.Google Scholar
Owadano, Y. et al. 1989 Laser Part. Beams 7, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partanen, J. P. & Shaw, M. J. 1986 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3, 1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosocha, L. A. et al. 1987 Fusion Technol. 11, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, I. N. et al. 1990 Opt. Commun. 78, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. J. et al. 1986 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3, 1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szatmari, S. & Schäfer, F. P. 1984 Appl. Phys. B 33, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szatmari, S. & Schäfer, F. P. 1988 Opt. Commun. 68, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomie, T., Okuda, I. & Yano, M. 1989 Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar