Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:06:43.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Propagation of microsecond electron beams in gases and excimer laser-ionized channels in the ion-focused regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

R. F. Lucey Jr. ,
R. M. Gilgenbach ,
J. E. Tucker  and
C. L. Enloe
R. F. Lucey Jr.
Affiliation:
Intense Energy Beam Interaction Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2104, USA
R. M. Gilgenbach
Affiliation:
Intense Energy Beam Interaction Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2104, USA
J. E. Tucker
Affiliation:
Intense Energy Beam Interaction Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2104, USA
C. L. Enloe
Affiliation:
Intense Energy Beam Interaction Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2104, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments have been performed to investigate the transport and stability of microsecond-pulselength intense relativistic electron beams in the ‘ion-focused regime’ (IFR) in low-pressure neutral gas and laser-preionized channels. Beams have been generated by the Michigan Electron Long Beam Accelerator (MELBA) which operates with parameters: voltage = −0·7 to −1 MV electrically compensated for collapsing diode impedance over the first 1·5 μs, pulselength = 0·1 to 4μs limited by diode closure, and current = 0·2 to 30 kA.

Long pulse beam propagation experiments have demonstrated the following effects:

1) At pressures of 1–230 m Torr in air and helium with no laser-preionized channel:

a) the electron-beam transport efficiency peaks after times longer than the time calculated for beam-induced ionization to reach fe. = 1. Up to 100% efficient transport occurs during short spikes over a 1 m propagation distance.

b) Within 100 ns of efficient transport the propagated beam exhibits rapid beam cutoff in air and helium. This initial pulse of propagated current is followed by a series of 10 ns to 60 ns duration spikes for the remainder of the injected beam pulse. At higher gas pressures usually less current is propagated in the later peaks. At the lowest pressure for which significant current is propagated (7·6 m Torr air, 14 m Torr helium) the maximum transported current occurs in one of the later peaks.

2) In initial experiments with excimer-laser-ionized channels in diethylaniline at pressures of 3–8 × 10−4 Torr the electron-beam transport over 1·2 m is efficient (80% to 100%) for at least the first 0·5 μs and does not exhibit the erratic transport observed in the electron-beam induced channels. For fixed laser energy, a narrow pressure window exists for efficient and stable long pulse electron-beam transport. Pressures below optimal give inefficient transport while higher pressures cause ejection of the beam from the ionized channel at later times.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , November 1988 , pp. 687 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramyan, E. A., Efimov, E. N. & Kneishav, G. D. 1977, Proceedings of the 2nd International Topical Conference on High Power Electron and Ion Beam Research and Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 755–760.Google Scholar
Brake, M. L. et al. 1986, Appl. Phys. Lett., 49, 696.Google Scholar
Frost, C. A. et al. 1982, Appl. Phys. Lett., 41, 813.Google Scholar
Gilgenbach, R. M. et al. 1985, Invited Paper in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, page 126, IEEE Catalog Number 85 C 2121–2.Google Scholar
Greenspan, M. A. & Juhala, R. E. 1985, J. Appl. Phys., 57, 67.Google Scholar
Martin, W. E. et al. 1985, Phys. Rev. Lett., 54, 685.Google Scholar
Rieke, F. F. & Prepejchal, W. 1972, Phys. Rev. A, 6, 1507.Google Scholar
Roberson, C. A. et al. 1983, Infrared and millimeter waves, Vol. 10, Academic Press, Inc., pp. 361–397.Google Scholar
Shope, S. L. et al. 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 551.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. 1987, (Private Communication).Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. D. 1981, IEEE Trans. Nuclear Science, NS–28, 3375.Google Scholar
Woodworth, J. R., Green, T. A. & Frost, C. A. 1985, J. Appl. Phys., 57, 1648.Google Scholar