Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:02:36.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical simulation of emission spectra from ion beam-heated aluminum plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

J. J. MacFarlane
Affiliation:
Fusion Technology Institute, Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1500 Johnson Drive, Madison WI 53706
P. Wang
Affiliation:
Fusion Technology Institute, Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1500 Johnson Drive, Madison WI 53706

Abstract

Non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer calculations have been performed to predict emission spectra from plasma heated by intense proton beams. Multilevel, steady-state atomic rate equations were solved self-consistently with the radiation field to determine excitation and ionization populations. Ion beam effects were, included in the rate equations. Proton-impact ionization cross sections were calculated using a plane wave Born approximation model with Hartree-Fock wave functions for the electrons. We examined the dependence of emission spectra on the temperature and thickness of the plasma. In addition, Kα satellite line spectra were computed to assess its potential as a temperature diagnostic. Calculated Kα spectral results are compared with recent Particle Beam Fusion Accelerator II experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Apruzese, J.P. 1981 J.Q.S.R.T. 25, 419.Google Scholar
Apruzese, J.P. et al. 1980 J.Q.S.R.T. 23, 479.Google Scholar
Apruzese, J.P. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. A 29, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J. et al. 1990 Laser-Part Beams 8, 555.Google Scholar
Bauer, W. et al. 1988 Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Report 14–04–02P-16A (Karlsruhe, Germany).Google Scholar
Burgess, A. & Summer, H.P. 1976 Monogr. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 174, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenais-Popovics, C. et al. 1989 Phys. Rev. A. 40, 3194.Google Scholar
Clark, R.W. et al. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duston, D. & Davis, J. 1981 Phys. Rev. A. 23, 2602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duston, D. et al. 1983 Phys. Rev. A 27, 1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese Fischer, C. 1978 Comp. Phys. Comm. 14, 145.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, D.D. H. et al. 1990 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung Report GSI-90–15 (Darmstadt, Germany).Google Scholar
Khan, J.M. et al. 1965 Phys. Rev. 139, A1735.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, J. J. et al. 1990a University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute Report UWFDM- 822 and Fusion Power Associates Report FPA-90–1 (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, J.J. et al. 1990b Laser Part. Beams 8, 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, J.J. et al. 1991 University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute Report UWFDM- 847 and Fusion Power Associates Report FPA-91–1 (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Merzbacher, E. & Lewis, H.W. 1958 in Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 34, Flugge, S., ed. (Springer- Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
Meyer-ter-vehn, J. & Witkowski, S. 1990 Phys. Fluids B 2, 1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, E. & Zinamon, Z. 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7025.Google Scholar
Post, D.E. et al. 1977 Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 20, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, J.E. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. A. 31, 3323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobelman, I.I. et al. 1981 Excitation of Atoms and Broadening of Spectral Lines (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
Wang, P. 1991 Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin, in preparaton.Google Scholar