Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:59:03.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modification of stimulated Brillouin scattering due to magnetic anisotropy in laser–plasma interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. Khan ,
S. Sarkar ,
T. Desai  and
H.C. Pant
M. Khan
Affiliation:
Centre for Plasma Studies, Faculty of Science, Jadavpur University, Calcutta 700032, India
S. Sarkar
Affiliation:
Centre for Plasma Studies, Faculty of Science, Jadavpur University, Calcutta 700032, India
T. Desai
Affiliation:
Laser Fusion Programme, Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore 452013, India
H.C. Pant
Affiliation:
Laser Fusion Programme, Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore 452013, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laser plasma experiments reveal rich interplay between laser plasma instabilities. The growth of stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) is one of the most significant constraints of laser fusion experiments. In this paper, a mechanism of stabilization of SBS process due to magnetic anisotropy has been presented. Magnetic anisotropy induced by the temporally exponentially growing nonoscillating magnetic moment from inverse Faraday effect (IFE) has been studied.It has been shown that for interaction of Nd laser (λ = 1.06 μm) on solid deuterium target the SBS growth rate (y) ∼ 3.45 ps and the phase velocities of the incident and scattered electromagnetic (EM) waves have been shown to decay exponentially (∼e∼λ1) in this SBS process resulting in wave-number mismatch.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 491 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baldis, H.A. et al. 1991 Laser Plasma Interactions, Handbook of Plasma Physics (North Holland).Google Scholar
Chakraborty, B. et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. E 47, 2746.Google Scholar
Diverglio, D.J. et al. 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 541.Google Scholar
Kalanter, D. et al. 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2, 3161.Google Scholar
Kartunnen, S.J. et al. 1981 Phys. Fluids 24, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruer, W.L. 1980 Phys. Fluids 23, 1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruer, W.L. & Estabrook, K.G. 1981 Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena, Vol. 5, (Plenum Press, New York), p. 783.Google Scholar
Kruer, W.L. et al. 1996 Phys. Plasmas 3, 382.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D.S. et al. 1996 Persistent Anti-correlation of SRS and SBS in Gas Bag Plasma (Preprint).Google Scholar
Max, C.E. 1981 Phys. Laser-Fusion, Vol. 1, Technical Report 53107.Google Scholar
Peshme, D. et al. 1973 Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 203.Google Scholar
Perkins, F.W. & Flick, J. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 1012.Google Scholar
Ramani, A. & Max, C.E. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 1079.Google Scholar
Rose, H.A. 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S. et al. 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50, 1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shivamoggi, B.K. 1988 Introduction to Nonlinear Fluid Plasma Waves (Kluwer Academic Publishers), p. 69.Google Scholar
Stamper, J.A. et al. 1971 Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamper, J.A. & Ripin, B.H. 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 138.Google Scholar
Stamper, J.A. et al. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1177.Google Scholar
Steele, M.C. & Vural, B. 1969 Wave Interaction in Solid State Plasmas (McGraw Hill), p. 167.Google Scholar
Watt, R.G. et al. 1996 Phys. Plasmas 3, 1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, S.C. et al. 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 25.Google Scholar