Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:30:45.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inertial confinement fusion with magnetically compressed ion rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

R.N. Sudan
R.N. Sudan
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Plasma Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ballistic propagation and focusing of intense light-ion beams requires (1) close limits on allowable beam divergence (∼5 mrad) and (2) gas-filled magnetic lenses that must function effectively even if deleterious self-fields are generated during the passage of the beam through the lens. An alternative to ballistic focusing was suggested some years ago in which magnetically compressed light-ion rings capable of delivering 3–4 MJ in a pulse of ∼1 ns are transported to the target in a tube. This concept is reexamined in light of recent work on the creation of ion rings and magnetic compression of stabilized liners. The physics issues of (1) magnetic compression, (2) transport of ion rings in a tube, and (3) the interaction of the ring with the target will be explored to evaluate the feasibility of this scheme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 415 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bzura, J.J. et al. 1972 Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauser, M. J. & Sweeney, M.A. 1976 International Topical Conference on Electron Beam Research and Technology, Albuquerque, NM, SAND 76–5122, Vol. 1, p. 135.Google Scholar
Cook, D.L. et al. 1988 In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams, Kernforschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, Germany, p. 35.Google Scholar
Davis, H.A. et al. 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreike, P.L. et al. 1982 Phys. Fluids 25, 59.Google Scholar
Finn, J.M. & Sudan, R.N. 1982 Nucl. Fusion 22, 1443.Google Scholar
Lovelace, R.V.E. 1979 Phys. Fluids 22, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maenchen, J. et al. 1979 Phys. Fluids 22, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.N. et al. 1980 Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 808.Google Scholar
Olson, C.L. 1988 In Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Williamsburg, VA, p. 34.Google Scholar
Olson, C.L. 1989 In Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Pedrow, P. et al. 1989 Phys. Fluids B, 1, 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, S. 1981 Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudakov, L.I. 1989 In Proc. 2nd Dense Pinch Conference, Laguna Beach, CA, Pereira, N. and Rostoker, N., eds.Google Scholar
Rudakov, L.I. et al. 1991 Comments Plasma Phys. Control Fusion, 14, 141.Google Scholar
Sandel, F.L. et al. 1981 In Proceedings of the 4th International Topical Conference on High-Power Electron and Ion Beam Research and Technology, Palaiseau, Paris, France, p. 129.Google Scholar
Smirnov, V.P. 1991 private communication.Google Scholar
Sudan, R.N. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 476.Google Scholar
Sudan, R.N. & Ott, E. 1974 Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 355.Google Scholar
Tuszewski, M. 1988 Nucl. Fusion 28, 2033.Google Scholar
Van Devender, J.P. et al. 1986 In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams, Yamanaka, C., ed. (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) p. 43.Google Scholar
Weibel, E.S. 1975 Phys. Fluids 20, 1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonas, G. 1976 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 21, 1102.Google Scholar