Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:15:30.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of helium buffer gas on the atomic carbon nuclear-pumped laser at low power densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

A. K. Chung ,
M. S. Peck  and
M. A. Prelas
A. K. Chung
Affiliation:
Fusion Research Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Program, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A computer model has been developed and benchmarked for the nuclear-pumped atomic carbon laser. Experiments have been performed with the atomic carbon laser and with the radiolysis of CO2 as a benchmark for the model. The results of the CO2 radiolysis are described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 829 - 839
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, A. W. 1982 Physical Chemistry of Surfaces (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Albritton, D. L. 1978 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 22, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, A. K. & Prelas, M. A. 1984 Nucl. Sci. Eng. 86, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deloche, R. et al. 1976 Phys. Rev. A 13, 1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, H. A. 1979 Presented at the AIAA 12th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference,Williamsburg, VA, 1979.Google Scholar
Ikezoe, Y. et al. 1981 Radial. Phys. Chem. 17, 69.Google Scholar
International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries (IMSL) Manual, IMSL, Inc., 6th Floor, NBC Building, 7500 Bellaire Boulevard, Houston, TX 77036.Google Scholar
Khonde, K., Darville, J. & Gilles, J. M. 1982 J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. 20, 834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummler, R. et al. 1977 J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecours, M. et al. 1982 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, R. H. & Miley, G. H. 1974 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. PS-2, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, E. W. et al. 1978 U.S. Army Missile Research and Development Command Technical Report No. H-78–1, Vols. I-V.Google Scholar
Mieuwenhuys, B. E. 1983 Surf. Sci. 126, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, A. V. 1955 Phys. Rev. 99, 1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzman, R. L. 1961 Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 10, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelas, M. A. et al. 1977 Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelas, M. A. 1979 “Nuclear Pumping of the Atomic Carbon Laser,” Ph.D. dissertation, Nuclear Engineering Dept., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Prelas, M. A. & Miley, G. H. 1981 Nucl. Technol./Fusion 1, 473 (1981).Google Scholar
Prelas, M. A., Romero, J. B. & Person, E. F. 1982 Nucl. Technol./Fusion 2, 2 (1982).Google Scholar
Rhodes, C. K., ed. 1979, Excimer Lasers (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. J., Liang, R. H. & Schneider, R. T. 1981 Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science,Santa Fe, NM, 1981.Google Scholar
Schmeltekopf, A. L. & Fehsenfeld, F. C. 1970 J. Chem. Phys. 53, 3173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. & Thomson, R. M. 1978 Computer Modeling of Gas Lasers (Plenum, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, C. & Boyd, A. W. 1976 Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 8, 71 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, C., Boyd, A. W. & Bindner, P. E. 1970 Can. J. Chem. 48, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. W., Deyoung, R. J. & Harries, W. L. 1979 J. Appl. Phys. 50, 1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zediker, M. S., Prelas, M. A. & Miley, G. H. 1985 Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 637.Google Scholar