Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:16:14.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Otto Santa Ana A.
Otto Santa Ana A.
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three analyses of /-t,d/ deletion are undertaken to investigate whether convergence with the matrix regional dialect has taken place in Los Angeles Chicano English. Two superficial analyses mistakenly find convergence. A third emic multivariate analysis finds no phonological convergence. It is argued that sonority of adjacent consonants accounts for most of the variation. In order to give an account of the degree and direction of the /-t,d/ deletion processses in Chicano English, Clement's (1988) model of nonaffixal syllabification, which is also based on sonority, is extended to this affix-affecting delection process.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 63 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayley, Robert. (1994). Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English. Language Variation & Change 6:303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. (1979). The language of radio news in Auckland: A sociolinguistic study of style, audience, and subediting variation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Bills, Garland. (1977). Vernacular Chicano English: Dialect or interference? Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Sorthwest 2:30–36.Google Scholar
Butt, Matthias. (1992). Sonority and the explanation of syllable structure. Linguistiche Berichte 137:45–67.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Halle, Morris. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. (1988). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 2:1–68.Google Scholar
Galindo, D. Letticia. (1987). Linguistic influence and variation on the English of Chicano adolescents in Austin, Texas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 1–36.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1991a). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation & Change 3:223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1991b). Explanation in variable lexical phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation & Change 3:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory, & Boberg, Charles. (1994). The Obligatory Contour Principle and sociolinguistic variation. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIII conference,Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hartford, Beverly S. (1975). The English of Mexican-American adolescents in Gary, Indiana. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Heffner, R. M. S. (1950). General phonetics. Madison.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan Bybee. (1976). Strength relation in syllable structure. In Hooper, Joan B., An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic. 196–208.Google Scholar
Kahn, David. (1980). Syllable-based generalisations in English phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1979). Metrical structure is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:421–441.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Arlington, VA: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation & Change 1:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto-Rican speakers of New York City. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. (1972). Manual de pronunciación español. 17th ed. Publication 3 of La revista de filología española, Madrid.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. (1991). Creoles at the intersection of varialble processes: -t,d deletion and pastense marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation & Change 3:171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, Francisca. (1984). The Chicano English dilemma: Deficit or dialect? La red/The Net 79:2–8.Google Scholar
Santa Ana A., Otto. (1991). Phonetic simplification processes in the English of the barrio: A cross-generational sociolinguistic study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Santa Ana A., Otto. (1992). Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A varialble rule pervades lexical phonology. Language Variation & Change 4:275–288.Google Scholar
Santa Ana A., Otto. (1993). Chicano English and the Chicano language setting. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 15:1–35.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. ([1911] 1974). Cours de linguistique générale. Balley, Charles & Sechehaye, Albert, eds. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert J. (1966). Phonotactic grammaticality. The Hague: Mouton. 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.), Language sound structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert, & Bowen, J. Donald. (1965). The sounds of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Veatch, Thomas C. (1991). English vowels: their surface phonology and phonetic implementation in vernacular dialects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1974). Sociolinguistic aspects of assimilation. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zabrocki, Ludwig. (1963). Die Stimmhaftigkeit der Laute. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 16:1–3.Google Scholar