Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:39:36.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Peggy P. K. Mok ,
Donghui Zuo  and
Peggy W. Y. Wong
Peggy P. K. Mok
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Donghui Zuo
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Peggy W. Y. Wong
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cantonese has six lexical tones (T), but some tone pairs appear to be merging: T2 [25] vs. T5 [23], T3 [33] vs. T6 [22], and T4 [21] vs. T6 [22]. Twenty-eight merging participants and thirty control participants in Hong Kong were recruited for a perception experiment. Both accuracy rate and reaction time data were collected. Seventeen merging participants also participated in a production experiment. Predictive discriminant analysis of the fundamental frequency data and judgments by native transcribers were used to assess production accuracy. Results show that the merging participants still had six tone categories in production, although their “tone space” was more reduced. Tones with lower type frequency were more prone to change. The merging group was significantly slower in tone perception than the control group was. In illustrating the patterns of the ongoing tone merging process in Cantonese, this study contributes to a better understanding of the forces of sound change in general.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , October 2013 , pp. 341 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, Robert S., Cheung, Kwan Hin, & Cheung, Pak Man. (2003). Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change 15:211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Robert S., & Benedict, Paul. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5:341–345.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2007). Frequency of Use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Shui Duen, & Tang, Zhi Xiang. (1990). Quantitative analysis of lexical distribution in different Chinese communities in the 1990's. Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong (Applied Linguistics) 3:10–18.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1930). A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45:24–27.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1947). Cantonese primer. New York: Greenwood Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ciocca, Valter, & Lui, Jessica. (2003). The development of lexical tone perception in Cantonese. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 1:141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fok-Chan, Yuen Yuen. (1974). A perceptual study of tones in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Roxana., Kung, Carmen, Law, Sampo, Su, I Fan., & Wong, Cathy. (2012). Near-merger in Hong Kong Cantonese tones: A behavioural and ERP study. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL2012), Nanjing, China, May 26–29.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jackson. (1981). Perceptual dimensions of tone: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9:20–36.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, & Maclagan, Margaret A. (2001). “Capturing a sound change”: A real time study over 15 years of the NEAT/SQUARE diphthong merger in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 21:215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenlee, Mel, & Ohala, John. J. (1980). Phonetically motivated parallels between child phonology and historical sound change. Language Sciences 2:283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine. (2003). Manange tone: Scenarios of retention and loss in two communities. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. B. (1976). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morpho-phonological change. In Christie, William (ed.), Current progress in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 95–105.Google Scholar
Hotelling, Harold. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 28:312–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Dan, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle, & Raymond, William. (2000). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, Joan. & Hopper, Paul (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229–254.Google Scholar
Kei, Joseph, Smyth, Veronica, So, Lydia K. H., Lau, C. C., & Capell, K. (2002). Assessing the accuracy of production of Cantonese lexical tones: A comparison between perceptual judgement and an instrumental measure. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 7:25–38.Google Scholar
Khouw, Edward, & Ciocca, Valter. (2007). Perceptual correlates of Cantonese tones. Journal of Phonetics 35:104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killingley, Siew Yue. (1985). A new look at Cantonese tones: Five or six? Newcastle upon Tyne: Grevatt & Grevatt.Google Scholar
Kratochvil, Paul. (1986). The case of the third tone. In The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong (ed.), Wang Li memorial volumes. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing. 253–276.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1981). Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language 57:267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles in linguistic change. Vol. 2. Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Leung, Man Tak, Law, Sam Po, & Fung, Suk Yee. (2004). Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 36:500–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei. (2007). The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, James, & Li, Yingshing. (2009). Lexical frequency effects in Taiwan Southern Min syllable contraction. Journal of Phonetics 37:212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokes, Jacqui, & Hay, Jennifer. (2012). Acoustic correlates of rhythm in New Zealand English: A diachronic study. Language Variation and Change 24:1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C., Hendrick, R., & Miller, M. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, The University of Chicago. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1983). The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, C. (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives. London: Longman. 237–278.Google Scholar
Philips, Betty S. (1984). Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60:320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, Betty S.. (2001). Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Phil. (1987). Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication 6:343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, Lydia K. H., & Dodd, Barbara. (1995). The acquisition of phonology by Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 22:473–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, Barbara G., & Fidell, Linda S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (1977). Tonal distinctions in Cantonese. Phonetica 34:93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varley, Rosemary, & So, Lydia K. H. (1995). Age effects in tonal comprehension in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 23:76–97.Google Scholar
Wang, William S. Y. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45:9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S. Y., & Chen, Chin-Chuan. (1977). Implementation of phonological change: The Shaungfeng Chinese case. In Wang, William S. Y. (ed.), The Lexicon in phonological change. The Hague: Mouton. 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Anita M. Y., Ciocca, Valter, & Yung, Sun. (2009). The perception of lexical tone contrasts in Cantonese children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 52:1493–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, Richard. (2004). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In Local, J., Ogden, R. & Temple, R. A. M. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 75–87.Google Scholar
Yiu, Carine Y. (2009). A preliminary study on the change of rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese: An experimental study (in Chinese). Language and Linguistics 10:269–291.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. (2007). Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology 24:187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Kristine M., & Lam, Hui Wai. (2011). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, August 17–21. 2240–2243.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie. (2001). The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution: A typological survey and formal analysis. Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yuan, & Jurafsky, Dan. (2007). The effect of lexical frequency on tone production. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Saarbrücken, Germany, August 6–10. 477–480.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yuan, & Jurafsky, Dan. (2009). The effect of lexical frequency and Lombard reflex on tone hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 37:231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar