Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:17:45.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptive evaluation of Levenshtein dialect distance measurements using Norwegian dialect data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2004

Charlotte Gooskens  and
Wilbert Heeringa
Charlotte Gooskens
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Wilbert Heeringa
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Levenshtein dialect distance method has proven to be a successful method for measuring phonetic distances between Dutch dialects. The aim of the present investigation is to validate the Levenshtein dialect distance with perceptual data from a language area other than the Dutch, namely Norway. We calculate the correlation between the Levenshtein distances and the distances between 15 Norwegian dialects as judged by Norwegian listeners. We carry out this analysis to see the degree to which the average Levenshtein distances correspond to the psychoacoustic perception of the speakers of the dialects.The present article reports on part of a study supported by NWO, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. We are grateful for the permission from Kristian Skarbø and Jørn Almberg to use their material and for the help of Jørn Almberg during the whole investigation. We thank Saakje van Dellen for her obliging help with the data entry and Peter Kleiweg for letting us use the programs that he developed for the visualization of the maps and dendrograms in this article. Finally, we would like to thank John Nerbonne for valuable comments and for correcting our English.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , October 2004 , pp. 189 - 207
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, Peter. (1998). Dialectology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christiansen, Hallfrid. (1954). Hovedinndelingen av norske dialekter. In Maal og Minne. Oslo: Bymålslaget. 30–41.
Daan, Jo, & Blok, D. P. (1969). Van randstad tot landrand. Toelichting bij de kaart: Dialecten en naamkunde. In Bijdragen en mededelingen der dialectencommissie van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgeversmaatschappij. 37, 9–41.
Fintoft, Knut, & Mjaavatn, Per-Egil. (1980). Tonelagskurver som målmerke. In Maal og Minne. 66–87. Oslo: Bymålslaget.
Gooskens, Charlotte. (1997). On the role of prosodic and verbal information in the perception of Dutch and English language varieties. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Gooskens, Charlotte, & Heeringa, Wilbert. (2004). The position of Frisian in the Germanic language area. In Dicky Gilbert, Maartje Schreuder, & Nienke Knevel (eds.), On the boundaries of phonology and phonetics. Groningen: Klankleergroep, Faculty of Arts, University of Groningen. Dedicated to Tjeerd de Graaf. Available at: http://www.let.rug.nl/∼heeringa/dialectology/ papers/. 61–87.
Heeringa, Wilbert. (2004). Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levenshtein distance. Doctoral dissertation. University of Groningen. Available at: http://www.let.rug.nl/∼heeringa/dialectology/thesis/.
International Phonetic Association. (1949). The principles of the International Phonetic Association: Being a description of the International Phonetic Alphabet and the manner of using it, illustrated by texts in 51 languages. London: International Phonetic Association.
International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jain, Anil K., & Dubes, Richard C. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kessler, Brett. (1995). Computational dialectology in Irish Gaelic. Proceedings of the European ACL. Dublin: ACL. 60–67.
Kristoffersen, Gjert. (2000). The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kruskal, Joseph B. (1999). An overview of sequence comparison. In David Sankoff & Joseph Kruskal (eds.), Time warps, string edits, and macro molecules: The theory and practice of sequence comparison. Stanford: CSLI. 1–44.
Leitre, Arild, Lundeby, Einar, & Torvik, Ingvald. (1981). Språket vårt før og no. Språkhistorie, norrønt, dialektar, nyislandsk. Hestholm: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
Nerbonne, John, & Heeringa, Wilbert. (1998). Computationele vergelijking en classificatie van dialecten. Taal en Tongval, Tijdschrift voor Dialectologie, 50(2):164–193. Available at: http://www.let.rug.nl/∼heeringa/dialectology/papers/.Google Scholar
Omdal, Helge. (1995). Attitudes toward spoken and written Norwegian. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 115:85–106.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis. (1999). Handbook of perceptual dialectology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sandøy, Helge. (1993). Talemål. Oslo: Novus Forlag.
Skjekkeland, Martin. (1997). Dei norske dialektane. Tradisjonelle særdrag i jamføring med skriftmåla. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.
Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy, a series of books in biology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1962). The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon 11:33–40.Google Scholar