Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:53:02.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2007

Terry Lynn Irons
Terry Lynn Irons
Affiliation:
Morehead State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an effort to provide greater understanding of the mechanisms of the diffusion of the low back vowel merger in American English, this study presents a detailed acoustic analysis of low back vowel systems in the speech of 114 native nonurban Kentucky speakers of English. The study reveals unexpected instances of merger in areas of the state that cannot be explained by current theories of merger. In this respect, it argues that these instances of low back vowel merger, while they may be an expansion of an existing merger, result from a distinct mechanism of merger, that is, merger by glide loss. It is predicted that as elements of traditional Southern phonology recede, similar merger will be widespread across the South.This research has been supported by grants from the Kentucky NSF EPSCoR Research Enhancement Grant Program and the Institute for Regional Analysis and Public Policy at Morehead State University. An earlier version of this work was presented at the South Atlantic American Dialect Society session at SECOL 72.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 137 - 180
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Bridget. (2005). The [open back unrounded]/[open-mid back rounded] merger moves to Roswell, Georgia. SECOL 72. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Sand, Lori. (1993). Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 5:359–390.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenik, David. (2005). PRAAT 4.21. Software Application. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
Di Paolo, Marianna. (1992). Hypercorrection in response to the apparent merger of ([open-mid back rounded]) and ([open back unrounded]) in Utah English. Language and Communication 12:267–292.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1993). Low back vowels in Alabama: Yet another merger. Poster session. NWAV 22, Ottawa.
Fridland, Valerie. (1998). The southern vowel shift: Linguistic and social factors. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Fridland, Valerie. (2004). The spread of the cot/caught merger in the speech of Memphians: An ethnolinguistic marker? LAVIS III. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama.
Gordon, M. (2001). Missouri is for Mergers. NWAV 30. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Gordon, M. (2006). Tracking the low back merger in Missouri. In T. Murray & B. Simon (eds.), Language variation and change in the American Midland: A new look at “Heartland” English. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Harris, John. (1985). Phonological variation and change: Studies in Hiberno-English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartman, James. (1985). Guide to pronunciation. In F. Cassidy (ed.), Dictionary of American Regional English. Volume I. Boston: Harvard University Press. xli–lxi.
Herold, Ruth. (1990). Mechanisms of merger: The implementation and distribution of the low back merger in Eastern Pennsylvania. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Herold, Ruth. (1997). Solving the actuation problem: Merger and immigration in eastern Pennsylvania. Language Variation and Change 9:149–164.Google Scholar
Irons, Terry. (2000). Low back vowels in Kentucky speech. In M. Henderson (ed.), 1999 Mid-American Linguistics Conference papers. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas. 143–155.
Irons, Terry. (2005). Anatomy of a merger. SECOL 72. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Klatt, Dennis. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59:1208–1221.Google Scholar
Kleber, John. (1993). The Kentucky encyclopedia. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Kurath, Hans, & McDavid, Raven. (1961). The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Labov, William. (1991). The three dialects of English. In P. Eckert (ed.). New ways of analyzing sound change. New York: Academic Press. 1–44.
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William. (1996). The organization of dialect diversity in North America. ICSLP4, Philadelphia, October 6, 1006. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/phono_atlas/ICSLP4.html.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (1997). A national map of the regional dialects of American English. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/phono_atlas/NationalMap/NationalMap.html.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
Labov, William., Yaeger, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.
Majors, Tivoli. (2004). Language, identity and urban sprawl in St. Louis, Missouri. Poster Session. NWAV 33. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Majors, Tivoli. (2005). Low back vowel merger in Missouri speech: Acoustic description and explanation. American Speech 80:165–179.Google Scholar
Moonwoman, Birch. (1987). Truly awesome: ([open-mid back rounded]) in California English. In K. Denning, S. Inkelas, F. McNari-Knox, & J. Rickford (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford University: Department of Linguistics. 325–36.
Newell, Wayne. (1986). Physiography. In R. McDowell (ed.), The geology of Kentucky: A text to accompany the geologic map of Kentucky. Denver: U.S. Geologic Survey. 64–68.
Peterson, Gordon, & Barney, Harold. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 24:175–184.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartlomiej. (2005). Akustyk 1.74. Software Application. http://www.bartus.org.
Thomas, Erik. (2001). An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English. Publication of the American Dialect Society 85. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Thomas, Erik. (2003). Secrets revealed by southern vowel shifting. American Speech 78:150–170.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). Linguistic change and diffusion. Language in Society 3:215–246.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, & Foxcroft, Tina. (1978). On the sociolinguistics of vocalic mergers: Transfer and approximation in East Anglia. In P. Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. Baltimore: University Park Press. 69–79.
Wetmore, Thomas. (1959). The low-central and low-back vowels in the English of the Eastern United States. Publication of the American Dialect Society 32. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.