Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:27:31.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On resolving disagreement: Linguistic theory and variation – There's bridges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Marjory Meechan  and
Michele Foley
Marjory Meechan
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Michele Foley
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of concord variation in English have found subject-verb concord to be particularly low in existential sentences such as There's bridges. Noting that these sentences are unusual because the subject NP is postverbal and is generally indefinite, we hypothesized that the unusual concord variation pattern was a result of structural differences associated with the restriction on the type of determiners preceding the postverbal NP. Using variationist methodology, we analyzed natural speech data from 31 speakers of standard Canadian English and found an overwhelming preference for singular agreement in existentials. Contrary to our predictions, this was not linked to a determiner-based structural distinction, but rather to the form of the copula (i.e., full or clitic) and the speaker's level of education. Our findings have implications for those theoretical studies of existentials that assume concord, because the effect of education suggests that this assumption reflects the bias of the higher educational level of the researchers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 63 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aniya, Socei. (1992). The semantics and syntax of the existential there-construction. Linguistic Analysis 22:154–183.Google Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby. (1953). A survey of verb forms in the eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. (1988). The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19:1–34.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack. (1991). Canada: Introduction. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 89–107.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack, & Hardwick, Margaret. (1986). Comparative sociolinguistics of a sound change in Canadian English. English World-Wide 7:123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 417–454.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1992). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1:1–71.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian J. (1988). Chomsky's universal grammar. An introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth. (1988). What is a subject? Non-nominative subjects in Icelandic. NELS 18:53–100.Google Scholar
Davison, John. (1987). On saying /aw/ in Victoria. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 7:109–122.Google Scholar
DeWolf, Gaelan Dodds. (1992). Social and regional factors in Canadian English. Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisikovits, Edina. (1991). Variation in subject-verb agreement in Inner Sydney English. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph, & Nakano, Yoshiko. (1991). Contraction and deletion in Vernacular Black English: Creole history and relationship to Euro-American English. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the White community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, N., & Speas, M. (1986). Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8:128–172.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. (1991). Expletives: A comparative study of English and Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 47:1–88.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. (1965). The philosophy of grammar. New York: Norton Library.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. (1983). The syntax of auxiliary reduction in English. Language 59:93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, J. A. W. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., & Stokof, M. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre. 277–321.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, & Sportiche, Dominique. (1988). Subjects. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda,(1991). The position of subjects. Lingua 85:211–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, John & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. (1992). Case and expletives: Notes toward a parametric account. Linguistic Inquiry 23:381–406.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. (1993). Lectures on minimalist syntax. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
May, R. (1977). The grammar of quantification. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
May, R. (1985). Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meechan, Marjory. (1992). In search of the missing link: Copula contraction in Canadian English. Paper given at NWAVE-XXI. Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Milsark, G. (1974). Existential sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Milsark, G. (1977). Towards an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3:1–31.Google Scholar
Payne, John. (1985). Negation. In Shopin, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 196–242.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. (1992). The inherent variability of the French subjunctive. In Lauefer, C. & Morgan, T. (eds.), Theoretical studies in romance linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 235–263.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1991). African American English in the diaspora: The case of old-line Nova Scotians. Language Variation and Change 3:301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, & Greenbaum, Sidney. (1973). A university grammar of English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, & Wrenn, Christopher L. (1957). An Old English grammar. 2nd ed.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Safir, K. (1985). Syntactic chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, & Rand, David. (1990). Goldvarb 2.0: A variable rule application for the Macintosh. Montreal: Université de Montréal, Centre de recherches mathématiques.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, & Vincent, Diane. (1977). L'emploi productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Le français moderne 45:243–256.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. (1984). There insertion. Linguistic Inquiry 15:131–153.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Woods, Howard B. (1979). A socio-dialectology survey of the English spoken in Ottawa: A study of sociological and stylistic variation in Canadian English. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. (1988). Verb phrase syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar