Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T01:17:16.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obviously undergoing change: Adverbs of evidentiality across time and space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Sali A. Tagliamonte  and
Jennifer Smith
Sali A. Tagliamonte
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Jennifer Smith
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Increasingly globalized communication networks in the modern world may influence traditional patterns of linguistic change: in contrast to an orderly sequential pathway of change, more recently a number of “mega trends” have been identified, which accelerate simultaneously in time and space. The rise of obviously within the cohort of adverbs of evidentiality—naturally, evidently, clearly, and of course—may be one such trend. To examine this possibility, we conduct a large-scale sociolinguistic analysis of c12,000 adverbs of evidentiality across over thirty communities in the UK and Canada. The results reveal parallel development across time and space: obviously advances rapidly among individuals born in the 1960s in both countries. The rise of obviously illustrates key attributes that are beginning to emerge from other rapidly innovating features: “off the shelf” changes that (1) are easily borrowed, (2) receptive to global trends, but (3) exhibit parallel patterns as the change progresses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 81 - 105
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aijmer, K. (2007). Modal adverbs in interaction—obviously and definitely in adolescent speech. In Nevalainen, T., Taavitsainen, I., Pahta, P. & Korhonen, M. (Eds.), The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 61–83.Google Scholar
Almeida, F. A. (2012). Sentential evidential adverbs and authorial stance in a corpus of English computing articles. Volumen Monográfico: 15–31.Google Scholar
Anderwald, L. & Wagner, S. (2005). FRED – The Freiburg English Dialect corpus. In Beal, J., Corrigan, K. & Moisl, H. (Eds.), Papers from the 20th Sociolinguistics Symposium at Newcastle. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., Wikle, T., Tillery, J. & Sand, L. (1991). The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3(3): 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., Wikle, T., Tillery, J. & Sand, L.. (1993). Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 5(3): 359–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaresi, M. (1987). “Obviously” and “certainly”: Two different functions in argumentative discourse. Folia Linguistics 21(1): 3–24.Google Scholar
Bellert, I. (1977). On Semantic and Distributional Properties of Sentential Adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 337–51.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language history. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Blythe, R. A. & Croft, W. (2012). S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88(2): 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, C. (2000). Geolinguistic diffustion and the U.S.-Canada border. Language Variation and Change 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. (2002). Space and spatial diffusion. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 603–37.Google Scholar
Britain, D. (2004). Geolinguistics and linguistic diffusion. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. & Trudgill, P. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, I. & Traugott, E. C. (2006). The lady was demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb ALL. English Language and Linguistics 10(2): 345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1995). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K.. (2002). Patterns of variation including change. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 349–72.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J., Fox, S., Kerswill, P., Khan, A. & Torgersen, E. (2007–2010). Multicultural London English: the emergence, acquisition and diffusion of a new variety. Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC) Grant.Google Scholar
D'Arcy, A. (2017). Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context: 800 years of like. Amsterdam and New York: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D. (2015). The development of pragmatic markers in Canadian English. PhD Dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Denis, D. & Tagliamonte, S. A. (2016). Innovation, right? Change, you know: Utterance Final Tags in Canadian English. In Pichler, H. (Ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 86–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, D. (2003). Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Hickey, R. (Ed.), Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, A. (2001). ‘Surely, you knew!’ Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions of language 8(2): 253–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, K. & Tagliamonte, S. A. (2020). New -way(s) with -ward(s): Lexicalization, splitting and sociolinguistic patterns. Language Variation and Change Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2020: 1–23.Google Scholar
Franco, K. & Tagliamonte, S. A.. (2021). Interesting fellow or tough old bird? 3rd person male referents in Ontario. American Speech 92: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Álvarez, D. (1996). Epistemtic disjuncts in Early Modern English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1(2): 219–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (1988). Of course: A pragmatic particle in New Zealand women's and men's speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8(1): 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, J. (2016). Who Invented ‘Gloomy’? Lies People Want to Believe About Shakespeare. Memoria di Shakespeare: a journal of Shakespearean Studies 3: 21–45.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoye, L. (2008). Evidentiality in discourse: A pragmatic and empirical account. In Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.), Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 151–74.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, E. (2001). Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam and New York: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Jankowski, B. & Tagliamonte, S. A. (2019). Supper or dinner? Sociolinguistic variation in the meals of the day English World Wide 40(2): 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. (2017). Evidential adverbs of clearly and obviously: a corpus-based analysis. SNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language 15: 68–79.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. & Cheshire, J. (2004–2007). Linguistic Innovators: The English of adolescents in London ESRC Research Grant (RES-000-23-0680).Google Scholar
Kroch, A. S. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23(1): 30–87.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Volume 1: Internal factors. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Volume 2: Social factors. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2003). Pursuing the cascade model. In Britain, D. & Cheshire, J. (Eds.), Social Dialectology: In honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2007). Transmission and Diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1997). Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenker, U. (2010). Argument and rhetoric: Adverbial connectors in the history of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. (2000). Some emergent discourse connectives in English: Grammaticalization via rhetorical patterns. PhD dissertation. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M.. (2002). Rhetorical motivations for the emergence of discourse particles, with special reference to English of course. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16(1): 79–91.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. M. S. (1994). Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (2007). Off the shelf or under the counter? On the social dynamics of sound changes. In Cain, C. & Russom, G. (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language III: Managing chaos: Strategies for identifying change in English. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. (1976). Indicating the Truth of Propositions: A Pragmatic Function of Sentence Adverbs. Papers from the Tweifh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 495–505.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (2015). Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. University of Helsinki: VARIENG. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/nevalainen/.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (2003). Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., Zentella, A. C. & Livert, D. (2007). Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language 83(4): 770–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J., Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (2010). The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3(1): 31–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petré, P. & van de Velde, F. (2018). The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language 94(4): 867–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2007). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. & Thibault, P. (1981). Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. In Johns, B. B. & Strong, D. R. (Eds.), Syntactic Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 205–16.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (1992). The interactional utility of of course in spoken discourse. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 6: 213–26.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. & Aijmer, K. (2004). The expectation marker ‘of course’ in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Davidse, K. & Hayvaert, L. (Eds.), Functional Linguistics and Contrastive Description. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 13–43.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. & Aijmer, K.. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (2000). Synchrony and diachrony in the evolution of English: Evidence from Scotland. PhD dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Strobl, C., Malley, J. & Tutz, G. (2009). An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests. Psychological methods, 14(4): 323–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, D. (2016). Form and function of the modal adverbbs: Recent linguistic change and constancy in British English. Linguistics 53(6): 1365–89.Google Scholar
Swan, T. (1986). Sentence adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. PhD dissertation. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Swan, T.. (1988). The development of sentence adverbs in English. Studia Linguistica 42(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. (1996–1998). Roots of Identity: Variation and Grammaticization in Contemporary British English. Economic and Social Sciences Research Council (ESRC) of Great Britain. Reference #R000221842. (£25,643).Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A.. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 729–63.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A.. (2003–2006). Linguistic changes in Canada entering the 21st century. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410-2003-0005. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2): 135–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & D'Arcy, A. (2007). Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A., D'Arcy, A. & Rodriguez Louro, C. (2016). Outliers, impact and rationalization in linguistic change. Language 92(4): 824–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Hudson, R. (1999). Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(2): 147–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Jankowski, B. (2018). Golly, Gosh and Oh my God! What dialect corpora can tell us about swearwords. American Speech 95(1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. (1993). A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.. (2014). On the function of the epistemic adverbs surely and no doubt at the left and right peripheries of the clause. In Beeching, K. & Detges, U. (Eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 72–91.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. (1974a). Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in society 3: 215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. J.. (1974b). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J.. (2011). Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953/1968). Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 95–188.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A., Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. & Aijmer, K. (2010). How prosody reflects semantic change: A synchronic case study of of course. In Cuyckens, H., Davidse, K. & Vandelanotte, L. (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 103–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar