Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:34:11.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intersection of s-aspiration/deletion and spirantization in Honduran Spanish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jon Amastae
Jon Amastae
Affiliation:
The University of Texas, El Paso
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spanish dialects may differ according to the behavior of voiced obstruents following r, l, s, and the glides. For most dialects, for example, Mexican, fricatives occur in these environments; in some, such as highland Colombian, stops tend to occur. Another feature distinguishing dialects is s-aspiration/deletion. Several Central American dialects are of particular interest because they are both s-aspirating/deleting and stop-conserving in the series of postconsonantal environments (Canfield, 1961/1981). Detailed examination of spirantization in these dialects, as well as of the particular question of what occurs after /s/ → [s] [z] [h] [Ø] has been nonexistent. Obviously, if s is deleted before a voiced obstruent, the resulting environment of the obstruent is intervocalic, which is a favored environment for spirantization. For this investigation, 14 Honduran speakers were interviewed using standard sociolinguistic interview techniques. Tokens were transcribed and categorized according to whether s-aspiration/deletion had applied, whether spirantization had applied, and by preceding/following environment. It is shown that (a) in Honduran Spanish the group r, l, glides, and s inhibit spirantization variably, much as they do in highland Colombian Spanish; (b) neither voicing, aspiration, nor deletion of (s) favor spirantization, despite the apparently favorable (surface) environment created when deletion applies; (c) even though an analysis of (b) that orders spirantization before deletion is apparently explanatory, a view that attributes spirantization to syllable structure offers a more comprehensive explanation of what happens when the two variable processes intersect by applying to adjacent segments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 1989 , pp. 169 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amastae, J. (1982). Spanish stops and fricatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,San Diego, CA,December.Google Scholar
Amastae, J. (1986). A syllable-based analysis of Spanish spirantization. In Silva-Corvalán, C. & Jaeggli, O. (eds.), Studies in romance linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris. 2–33.Google Scholar
Amastae, J. (in press). Variable spirantization: Constraint ordering in three dialects. In Fasold, R. (ed.), Proceedings of NWAVE-XIV. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Canfield, D. L. (1981). Spanish pronunciation in the Americas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Reprint of 1961 ed.)Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H., & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2):333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerssel, M. (1978). A condition on assimilation rules. Linguistic Analysis 4(3):225–54.Google Scholar
Guy, G. (1975). Use and applications of the Cedergren–Sankoff variable rule program. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 59–69.Google Scholar
Guy, G. (1988). Advanced VARBRUL analysis. In Ferrara, K. et al. (eds.), Linguistic change and contact. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics (NWAVE-XVI). 124–36.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1982). Spanish spirantization as an autosegmental assimilation rule. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,San Diego, CA,December.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1986). Functional compensation for /s/ deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 62(3):609–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The isolation of contextual styles. In Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 70–109.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1983). Reducción de /s/ en el español de Honduras. Nueva Revista de filología hispánica XXXII:273–88.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1986). Instability and reduction of /s/ in the Spanish of Honduras. Revista canadiense de estudios hispánicos XI(1):27–47.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1987). Fonética y fonología del español de Honduras. Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras.Google Scholar
Monies Giraldo, J. (1975). Breves notas de fonética actual del español. Thesaurus 30:338–39.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S. (1986). VARBRUL 2s for the microcomputer [Computer program and documentation]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (1979). Function and process in a variable phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (1980). Deletion and disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 56(2):371–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, P., & Sankoff, D. (1978). Advances in variable rule methodology. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 57–69.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988). Variable rules. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., & Mattheier, K. J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin: de Gruyter. 982–97.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Labov, W. (1979). On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8(2):189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Rousseau, P. (1989). Statistical evidence for rule ordering. Language Variation and Change 1(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, B., & Steriade, D. (1986). On geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4):691–744.Google Scholar
Terrell, T. (1977). La aspiración y elisión en el español cubano: Implicaciones para una teoría fonológica dialectal. In Blanch, J. M. Lope (ed.), Estudios sobre el español hablado en las principales ciudades de América. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma. 39–48.Google Scholar
Terrell, T. (1978). Sobre la aspiración y elisión de la /s/ implosiva y final en el español de Puerto Rico. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 27:24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar