Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:57:32.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammatical and lexical factors in sound change: A usage-based approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Joan Bybee
Joan Bybee*
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The question of whether or not grammatical factors can condition or block sound change has been discussed from many perspectives for more than a century without resolution (Melchert, 1975). Here we consider studies of sound change in progress which show that words or phrases that are used frequently in the phonetic environment for change undergo the change before those whose use is less frequent in these contexts. Because words of different categories and with different structures also have different distributions, they may occur preferentially in certain phonetic environments. Thus, some apparent cases of influence by grammatical and lexical factors can be explained by phonetic factors if we expand our notion of phonetic environment to include frequency within the environment for change, which includes the segmental environment as well as factors that affect the degree of prominence a word receives in context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , October 2017 , pp. 273 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antilla, Raimo. (1972). An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan, Brenier, Jason, Gregory, Michelle, Girand, Cynthia, & Jurafsky, Daniel. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60(1):2–111.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Earl. K. (2009). A usage-based account of syllable- and word-final /s/ reduction in four dialects of Spanish. LINCOM Studies in Romance Linguistics 62. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther L. (2004). Reduction of syllable initial /s/ in the Spanish of New Mexico and southern Colorado: A usage based approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther L. (2005). Syllable-initial /s/ in Traditional New Mexican Spanish: Linguistic factors favoring reduction “ahina.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 24(1–2):13–30.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther L. (2013). Word classes in phonological variation: Conditioning factors or epiphenomena? In Howe, C., Blackwell, S., & Lubbers Quesada, M. (eds.) Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville: Cascadila Proceedings Project. 179–186.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther L., & Raymond, William D. (2012). How discourse context shapes the lexicon: Explaining the distribution of Spanish f- / h- words. Diachronica 92(2):139–161.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2000a). Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. In Broe, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 250–268.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2000b). The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 65–85.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically-conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14:261–290.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82:711–733.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2012). Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. In Solé, M. J. & Recasens, D. (eds.), The initiation of sound change: Perception, production and social factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, File-Muriel, Richard, & Napoleão de Souza, Ricardo. (2016). Special reduction: A usage-based approach. Language and Cognition 8:421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V., & Clark, Herbert H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55:767–811.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry, & Bowern, Claire. (2010). An introduction to historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/. Accessed May 2014.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2010). The corpus of historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/. Accessed November 2016.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. (2011). Corpus of American soap operas: 100 million words. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/soap/. Accessed October 2016.Google Scholar
D'Introno, Francisco, & Sosa, Juan M. (1986). La elisión de la /d/ in el español de Caracas: Aspectos sociolingüisticos e implicaciones teóricas. In Núñez Cedeño, R., Páez, I., & Guitart, J. (eds.), Estudios sobre el español del Caribe. Caracas: La Casa de Bello. 135–163.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1957). English pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. (1997). Genre and grammar: Predicative and attributive adjectives in spoken English. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on pragmatics and grammatical structure. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 411–421.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. (1975). “Short a” in Philadelphia English. In Smith, E. (ed.), Studies in linguistics in honor of George L. Trager. The Hague: Mouton. 259–274.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Gerard, & Docherty, Paul. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34:409–438.Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A., & Housum, Jonathan. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26:89–504.Google Scholar
Gahl, Suzanne. (2008). ‘Time’ and ‘thyme’ are not homophones: the effect of lemma frequency on word duration in spontaneous speech. Language 84:474–498.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew, & Johnson, Keith. (2012). Phonetic bias in sound change. In Yu, A. (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 51–97.Google Scholar
Godfrey, John, & Holliman, Edward. (1993). Switchboard-1 Release 2 LDC97S62. Web download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Available at: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/ldc97s62. Accessed June 2000.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle L., Raymond, William, Bell, Alan, Fosler-Lussier, Eric, & Jurafsky, Daniel. (1999). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Linguistic Society 35:151–166.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (2005). Variationist approaches to phonological change. In Joseph, B. and Janda, R (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 369–400.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, & Foulkes, Paul. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language 92(2):298–330.Google Scholar
Hay, Jen, Pierrehumbert, Janet, Walker, Abbie, & LaShell, Patric. (2015). Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change. Cognition 139:83–91.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan. (2014). Grammatically conditioned sound change. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(6):211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans H. (1976). Review article: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. By Raimo Anttila. Language 52(1):202–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In Christie, W. (ed.), Current progress in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 96–105.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. (1975). Phonology: Theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. (1909). A modern English grammar on historical principle. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. (1999). Utterance-finality: Framing the issues. In Palek, B., Fujimura, O., & Joseph, B. (eds.), Proceedings of LP ‘98 (4th Linguistics and Phonetics Conference). Prague: Charles University Press. 3–13.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. (1969). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1982). Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1981). Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57:267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The exact description of the speech community: Short a in Philadelphia. In Fasold, R. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language change and variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 1–57.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald, & Campbell, Lyle. (1978). Proto-Aztecan vowels: Part II. International Journal of American Linguistics 44(3):97–210.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred. (1992). Historical linguistics. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Melchert, Craig H. (1975). “Exception” to exceptionless sound laws. Lingua 35(2):135–153.Google Scholar
Moore, Samuel, & Marckwardt, Aalbert H. (1951). Historical outlines of English sounds and inflections. Ann Arbor: Geroge Wahr.Google Scholar
Morrill, Tuuli. (2011). Acoustic correlates of stress in English adjective-noun compounds. Language and Speech 55(2):167–201.Google Scholar
Ogura, Mieko. (1987). Historical English phonology: A lexical perspective. Tokyo: Kenkyushu.Google Scholar
Ogura, Mieko. (1995). The development of Middle English ī and ū: A reply to Labov (1992, 1994). Diachronica 12(1):31–53.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (2003). Phonetics and historical phonology. In Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 669–686.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. (1991). A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E., & Lehiste, Ilse. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(6):693–703.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. (1984). Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60:320–342.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. (2006). Word frequency and lexical diffusion. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 137–158.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N. (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 101–139.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2–3):115–154.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. (1980). Deletion and disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 53:371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1968). Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Raymond, William D., & Brown, Esther L. (2012). Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish. In Gries, S. & Divjak, D.. (eds.), Frequency effects in language. Vol. 2. Learning and processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, William D., Dautricourt, Robin, & Hume, Elizabeth. (2006). Word-internal /t,d/ deletion in spontaneous speech: Modeling the effects of extra-linguistic, lexical, and phonological factors. Language Variation and Change 18:55–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. (2014). Coarticulation and sound change in Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. (1991). Phonetic simplification processes in English of the barrio: A crossgenerational sociolinguistic study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Thurber, Beverly A. (2011). Voicing of initial interdental fricatives in Early Modern English function words. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23(1):65–81.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. (1978). Uniform and alternating environments in phonological change. Folia Slavica 2:312–328.Google Scholar
Trager, George. (1930). The pronunciation of ‘Short a’ in American English. American Speech 5:396–400.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice E., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie. (2007). Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35:445–472.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. (1974). Words and syllables in natural generative phonology. In Bruck, A., Fox, R. A., & La Galy, M. W. (eds.), Parasession on natural phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 346–374.Google Scholar