Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:37:51.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A variable rule pervades lexical phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Santa Ana A. Otto
Santa Ana A. Otto
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Guy (1991) proposed a linkage between empirical linguistics, in the morphological constraints of /-t,d/ deletion, and formal linguistic theory, in lexical phonology. He hypothesized an explanation for the actual rate of deletion reported in /-t,d/ studies in the three-tier lexical phonology model (Kiparsky, 1979): namely, that an exponential relationship exists in the relative rate of deletion of /-t,d/ clusters in words, according to different morphological classes as described in the three-tier model. In this article, the hypothesis is tested in the English of 45 Chicanos from Los Angeles, which as a recently formed dialect provides an interesting test case in two respects. A major difference exists between the English of older and younger Chicanos involving the morphological classes associated with /-t,d/ deletion. Additionally, age grading of the /-t,d/ deletion process operates only among the younger speakers. Guy's model receives solid independent confirmation in the Chicano English data. These results simultaneously integrate the three-tier lexical phonology model, Guy's hypothesis, and the dialect-specific characteristics of Chicano English.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , October 1992 , pp. 275 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fasold, Ralph W. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 1–36.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1991). Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory, & Boyd, Sally. (1990). The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change 2:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1972). Explanation in phonology. In Peters, S. (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:421–441.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1969). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1975). The quantitative study of linguistic structure. In Dahlstedt, Karl-Hampus (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 188–236.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto-Rican speakers of New York City. Philadelphia, PA: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Neu, Helene. (1980). Ranking of constraints on /-t,d/ deletion in American English: A statistical analysis. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 37–54.Google Scholar
Santa Ana A., Otto. (1991). Phonetic simplification processes in the English of the barrio: A cross-generational sociolinguistic study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1972). Overlapping influence and linguistic assimilation in second generation Puerto Rican English. In Smith, David M. & Shuy, Roger (eds.), Sociolinguisitics in cross-cultural analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 15–46.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar