Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:54:30.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of Polish migrants living in Manchester, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

Rob Drummond
Rob Drummond
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study uses variationist methods in an L2 context to investigate ING variation in the English speech of UK-based Polish migrants. The results suggest that such variation is as consistent in an L2 context as it is in an L1 context, with several of the expected L1 factors emerging as statistically significant constraints. However, two social factors emerge as particularly worthy of further discussion: the reversal of the typical gender pattern (in this case women are more likely to use the alveolar variant than men), and the question of whether the speaker intends to return to Poland in the future. Gender is discussed from the perspective of contexts of language use (occupation), and future plans is discussed in terms of its role in the construction of identity. There is a strong indication that the intention to return to Poland encourages the use of an ING variant, [ɪŋk], that signals this allegiance to the L1 identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 107 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowicz, Łukasz. (2007). Sociolinguistics meets exemplar theory: Frequency and recency effects in (ing). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2):27–37.Google Scholar
Adamson, H. D., & Regan, Vera M.. (1991). The acquisition of community speech norms by asian immigrants learning English as a second language: a preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira. (2004). Language and identity. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 369–394.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, & D'Arcy, Alexandra. (2009). Localized globalization: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(3):291–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn, & Trousdale, Graeme. (2009). Exploring the role of token frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-fronting in east-central Scotland. English Language and Linguistics 13(1):33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. Pit. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. (2010). Sociolinguistic variation in a second language: The influence of local accent on the pronunciation of non-native English speakers living in Manchester. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. (2011). Glottal variation in /t/ in non-native English speech: Patterns of acquisition. English World-wide 32(3):280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eade, John, Drinkwater, Stephen, & Garapich, Michal. (2006). Class and ethnicity–Polish migrants in London. CRONEM, University of Surrey, December.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2010). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1):461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Steve, Cowles, James, Lung, Barbara, & Stott, Marina. (2009). Sources of resentment, and perceptions of ethnic minorities among poor white people in England. D. f. C. a. L. Government. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, Elizabeth, Trofimovich, Pavel, & Magid, Michael. (2005). Learners’ ethnic group affiliation and L2 pronunciation accuracy: A sociolinguistic investigation. TESOL Quarterly 39: 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund. (2007). The phonology of Polish. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (2006). The in/ing variable. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 5:581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, & Meyerhoff, Miriam. (1999). The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28(2):173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann Celeste. (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2008). Rbrul, Version 1.9. ww.ling.upenn.edu/~johnson4/Rbrul.R.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1):359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, & Bean, Judith M.. (1999). Self-expression and linguistic variation. Language in Society 26(2):221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul, & Wilson, Andrew. (2001). Word frequencies in written and spoken English: based on the British National Corpus. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Lybeck, Karen. (2002). Cultural identification and second language pronunciation of Americans in Norway. Modern Language Journal 86(2):174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Nicole. (2002). Never quite a ‘native speaker’: Accent and identity in the L2–and the L1. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 59(2):264–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathisen, Anne. (1999). Sandwell, West Midlands: Ambiguous perspectives on gender patterns and models of change. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold:107–123.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. (2002). Language and identity. In Chambers, J., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (ed.) The handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 475–499.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. (2009). Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change 21(3):297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Leslie. (1987). Language and social networks. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Leslie & Milroy, James. (1992). Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21(1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Rehner, Katherine, & Nadasdi, Terry. (2004). The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(3):408–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics. (2010). Mid Year Population Estimates 2009.Google Scholar
Paolillo, John C. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Piller, Ingrid. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2):179–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali & Smith, Eric. (2005). Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Clark, Lynn. (2011). Teenagers’ acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens’ realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-wide 32(2):206–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, John. (1978). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In Gingras, R. C. (ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Arlington, VA, Center for Appplied Linguistics. 27–50.Google Scholar
Tabouret-Keller, Andree. (1997). Language and identity. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 315–326.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2004). Something's going on! In Gunnarsson, L., Bergstrom, G., Eklund, S. et al. (eds.), Language variation in Europe. Uppsala: Uppsala University. 390–403.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, Elaine. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research 1997–2007. The Modern Language Journal 91(s1):837–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Emma L. (2005). Mobility-induced dialect contact: A sociolinguistic investigation of speech variation in Wilmslow, Cheshire. Unpublished PhD thesis. Essex.Google Scholar
Wells, John. (1982). Accents of English Vol 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Richard. (1988). Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10(3):281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Richard. (1999). Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19(1):105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar