Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T17:46:07.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in negation in African American Vernacular English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Tracey Weldon
Tracey Weldon
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For quantitative sociolinguists, one of the goals of investigating variability in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) is to understand better the nature of the grammar. Specifically, researchers have been interested in whether the variation observed in AAVE is inherent to a single system or the result of interaction between two separate systems of AAVE and Standard English (SE). Variability in negation is an area of the AAVE grammar that has received minimal attention, but one that may offer some interesting insights into the nature of the system or systems at work. This article provides a framework to describe the variability between negative auxiliaries in predicative constructions based on a quantitative analysis of data collected in Columbus, Ohio. Five variables are investigated in this study. One involves interaction between third-person singular inflection and non-inflection in present do-support constructions (NEG pres). A second involves variation between ain't and don't with the predicates got or gotta (NEG GOT(ta)). And the other three involve interaction between ain't and negative auxiliaries in present copular (NEG COP), present perfect (NEG perf), and past do-support (NEG past) constructions. The results of this study show that, with the possible exception of the (NEG pres) variation, these alternations all appear to belong to one underlying system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 1994 , pp. 359 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, S., & Myhill, J. (1986). Linguistic correlates of inter-ethnic contact. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Beryl L. (1965). Toward a new perspective in Negro English dialectology. American Speech 40:171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., & Maynor, N. (1987). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., Maynor, N., & Cukor-Avila, P. (1989). Variation in subject-verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1:285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., & Schnebly, C. (1988). Auxiliary deletion in the Black English Vernacular. In Ferrara, K. et al. (eds.), Language change and contact (Texas Linguistic Forum 30). Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics. 34–41.Google Scholar
Baugh, John. (1979). Linguistic style-shifting in Black English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Baugh, John. (1980). A reexamination of the Black English copula. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 83–195.Google Scholar
Baugh, John. (1983). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Berdan, Robert. (1977). Polylectal comprehension and the polylectal grammar. In Fasold, Ralph & Shuy, Roger (eds.), Studies in language variation: Semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics, social situations, ethnographic approaches. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 12–29.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. (1975). Dynamics of a Creole system. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brainerd, Barron. (1989). The contractions of not: A historical note. Journal of English Linguistics 22:176–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. (1981). Variation in the use of “ain't” in an urban British English dialect. Language in Society 10:365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debose, Charles. (1994). A note on ain't vs. didn't negation in African American Vernacular. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 9:127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillard, Joe L. (1972). Black English: Its history and usage in the United States. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1981). The relation between Black and White English in the South. American Speech 56:163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph, & Wolfram, Walt. (1970). Some linguistic features of Negro dialect. In Fasold, Ralph & Shuy, Roger (eds.), Teaching Standard English in the inner city. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. 41–86.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the White community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fenn, Peter. (1987). A semantic and pragmatic examination of the English perfect. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Fickett, Joan G. (1970). Aspects of morphemics, syntax and semology of an inner-city dialect (Merican). West Rush, NY: Meadowbrook.Google Scholar
Holm, John. (1984). Variability of the copula in Black English and its Creole kin. American Speech 59:291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1949). A word geography of the eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972a). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1982). Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11:165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Report on cooperative research project 3288. Washington, DC: Office of Education.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Harris, W. (1986). De facto segregation of Black and White vernaculars. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1–24.Google Scholar
Loflin, Marvin D. (1970). On the structure of the verb in a dialect of American Negro English. Linguistics 59:14–28.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. Jr., (1969). Dialects: British and American standard and nonstandard. In Hill, A. (ed.), Linguistics today. New York: Basic. 79–88.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Observing and analysing natural language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. (1993). Scope of negation and focus in Gullah. In Byrne, Francis & Winford, Donald (eds.), Focus and grammatical relations in Creole languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. (in press). African-American English. In Algeo, J. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. 6. History of American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myhill, John, & Harris, W. (1986). The use of the verbal -s inflection in BEV. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Sankoff, D. (1987). The Philadelphia story in the Spanish Caribbean. American Speech 62:291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, S. (1989). There's no tense like the present: Verbal -s inflection in early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1:47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, D., & Sankoff, D. (1990). Goldvarb, version 2: A variable rule application for the Macintosh. Montreal: Université de Montréal, Centre de recherches mathématiques.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. (1974). The insights of the mesolect. In DeCamp, D. & Hancock, I. (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles: Current trends and prospects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 92–117.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. (1977). The question of prior creolization in Black English. In Valdman, Albert (ed.), Pidgin-creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 199–221.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. (1980). How does doz disappear? In Day, R. (ed.), Issues in English Creoles: Papers from the 1975 Hawaii Conference. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag. 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John, Ball, A., Blake, R., Jackson, R., & Martin, N. (1991). Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copula variation in African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 3:103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John, & Blake, R. (1990). Contraction and deletion of the copula in Barbadian English. In Hall, K., Koenig, J.-P., Meacham, M., Reinman, S., & Sutton, L. A. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 257–268.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1982). Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. (1982). On the history of Black English in the USA: Some new evidence. English World-Wide: A Journal of Varieties of English 3:18–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. (1989). American Earlier Black English: Morphological and syntactic variables. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, William. (1967). Sociolinguistic factors in the history of American Negro Dialects. Florida Foreign Language Reporter 5:11, 22, 24, 26, 30.Google Scholar
Stewart, William. (1968). Continuity and change in American Negro dialects. Florida Foreign Language Reporter 6:3–4, 14–16, 18.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (1977). English dialects: An introduction. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. (1983). A sociolinguistic analysis of negation in Trinidadian English. In Carrington, Lawrence (ed.), Studies in Caribbean language. St. Augustine, Trinidad: The Society for Caribbean Linguistics. 203–210.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. (1992). Another look at the copula in Black English and Caribbean Creoles. American Speech 67:21–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. (1993). Variability in the use of perfect have in Trinidadian English: A problem of categorial and semantic mismatch. Language Variation and Change 5:141–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1973). Sociolinguistic aspects of assimilation: Puerto Rican English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1974). The relationship of White Southern speech to Vernacular Black English. Language 50:498–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, D. (1976). Appalachian speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar