Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:14:41.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2011

Adam Baker ,
Diana Archangeli  and
Jeff Mielke
Adam Baker
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of Afghanistan
Diana Archangeli
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Jeff Mielke
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although formulated by Weinreich, Labov, and Herzog in 1968, the actuation problem has remained an unsolved problem in understanding sound change: if sound change is conceived as the accumulation of coarticulation, and coarticulation is widespread, how can some speech communities resist phonetic pressure to change? We present data from American English s-retraction that suggest a partial solution. S-retraction is the phenomenon in which /s/ is realized as an [ʃ]-like sound, especially when it occurs in an /stɹ/ cluster (‘street’ pronounced more like [ʃtɹit] than like [stɹit]). The speech of English speakers judged not to exhibit s-retraction shows a large coarticulatory bias in the direction of retraction. Further, there is also substantial interspeaker variation in the extent of this bias. We propose that this interspeaker variation, coupled with the coarticulatory bias, facilitates the initiation of sound change. In this account, sound change begins when a listener accidentally interprets an extreme case of a phonetic effect as an articulatory target and then adjusts her own speech in response. This adoption of a new target requires phonetic variation that predates the change. Thus, sound change is predicted to be biased toward phonetic effects that exhibit interspeaker variability, and if sound change requires an accident that is rare, then sound change itself is correctly predicted to be rare as well.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , October 2011 , pp. 347 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, Mike. (2003). /s/-retraction in the ViC corpus. ms, The Ohio State University ms.Google Scholar
Babel, Molly. (2009). Phonetic and Social Selectivity in Speech Accommodation. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baker, Adam. (2008a). Addressing the actuation problem with quantitative models of sound change. Proceedings from PLC 31. Special issue of vol. 14.1 of U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 14(1):29–41.Google Scholar
Baker, Adam. (2008b). Computational approaches to the study of language change. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(March):289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Shari R., & McNutt, James C. (1990). An acoustic analysis of frontal misarticulation of /s/ in children. Journal of Phonetics 18:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter. (2009). A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language 85:785–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter, Brasher, Anthony, & Narayan, Chandan. (2007). “Applying perceptual methods to the study of phonetic variation and sound change.” In Solé, M.-J., Beddor, P. S., and Ohala, M. (eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 125–143.Google Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter, Harnsberger, James D., & Lindemann, Stephanie. (2002a). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics 30:591–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter, Harnsberger, James D., & Lindemann, Stephanie. (2002b). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics 30:591–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. (2004). Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, John. (2000). “Where is coarticulation?” In Broe, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 102–117.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre, & Freeman, Donald C. (1968). “A dialect study of American R's by X-ray motion picture.” Language 44:29–68.Google Scholar
Durian, David. (2007 ). “Getting [s]tronger every day? : Urbanization and the socio-geographic diffusion of (str) in Columbus, OH.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. vol. 13:65–79.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. (2008). “Diachronic explanations of sound patterns.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5):859–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. (1999). “Accounts of phonemic split have been exaggerated—but not enough.” Proceedings of ICPhS 14.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. (2003). ““Phonologization” as the start of dephoneticization—or, on sound-change and its aftermath: Of extension, generalization, lexicalization, and morphologization.” In Joseph, B. D. & Janda, R. D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D., & Joseph, Brian D. (2003). “Reconsidering the canons of sound-change: Towards a “big bang” theory.” In Blake, B. & Burridge, K. (eds.), Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D., Joseph, Brian D., & Jacobs, Neil. (1994). “Systematic hyperforeignisms as maximally external evidence for linguistic rules.” In Lima, R. Corrigan & Iverson, G. (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesus, Luis M. T., & Shadle, Christine H. (2002). “A parametric study of the spectral characteristics of European Portuguese fricatives.” Journal of Phonetics 30:437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, Allard, Wayland, Ratree, & Wong, Serena. (2000). “Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(3):1252–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, Brian D. (2005). “On projecting variation back into a proto-language, with particular attention to Germanic evidence and some thoughts on “drift”.” In Cravens, Thomas D. (ed.), Variation and reconstruction. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 103–118.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). “Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation.” In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1: Internal factors. Chichester, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 2: Social Factors. Chichester, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2002). “Driving forces in linguistic change.” 2002 International Conference on Korean Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. (1984). “‘Out of chaos comes order’”: Physical, biological and structural patterns in phonetics.” In Van den Broecke, M. P. R. & Cohen, A. (eds.), Proceedings of ICPhS 10. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 83–95.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Wayne. (2000). “/str/→ /ʃtr/: Assimilation at a distance? “ American Speech 75(1):82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotto, Andrew J., & Kluender, Keith R. (1998). “General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification.” Perception & Psychophysics 60(4):602–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mielke, Jeff, Baker, Adam, & Archangeli, Diana. (2010). “Variability and homogeneity in American English /ɹ/ allophony and /s/ retraction.” In Kühnert, B. (ed.), Variation, detail, and representation. LabPhon 10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 699–729.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott. (2008). “Analytic bias and phonological typology.” Phonology 25(1):83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nittrouer, Susan, Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, & McGowan, Richard S. (1989) . “The emergence of phonetic segments evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults.” Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 32(1):120–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, John J. (1981). “The listener as a source of sound change.” In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A., & Miller, M. F. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1983). “The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints.” In MacNeilage, P. F. (ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag. 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1993). “Coarticulation and phonology.” Language and Speech 36(2–3):155–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, John J. (1994). “Hierarchies of environments for sound variation; plus implications for “‘neutral”‘ vowels in vowel harmony.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 27:371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J., & Ohala, Manjari. (1991a). “Nasal epenthesis in Hindi.” Phonetica 48:207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J., & Ohala, Manjari. (1991b). “Reply to commentators.” Phonetica 48:271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann. (1880). Prinzipien de Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). “Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast.” In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 323–418.Google Scholar
Rutter, Ben. (2011). “Acoustic analysis of a sound change in progress: The consonant cluster /stɹ/ in English.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(1):27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. (1995). “A case of distant assimilation: /str/ → /ʃtr/.” American Speech 70(1):101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Ian. (1999). “Phonetics, phonologization, and French nasal vowels.” Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics 4:157–173.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin. (1968). “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change.” In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. (1867/1896). Language and the study of language. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. (2010). “Perceptual compensation is correlated with individuals’ “autistic” traits: Implications for models of sound change.” PLoS ONE 5(8): E11950. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed