Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:47:20.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional diversity in social perceptions of (ing)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2017

Erik Schleef ,
Nicholas Flynn  and
William Barras
Erik Schleef
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg
Nicholas Flynn
Affiliation:
Unaffiliated Researcher
William Barras
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the perception of the (ing) variants, [ɪŋ] and [ɪn], in three regionally distinct localities in Britain: London in the South of England; Manchester in the North; and Edinburgh in Scotland. Data was gathered in perceptual tests in which respondents from each location rated stimuli doublets, each containing only one of the variants of (ing), on multiple social attribute scales. In London and Manchester, the perception of [ɪŋ] and [ɪn] broadly matches findings made for the United States in that speakers using [ɪŋ] are considered more articulate and hardworking, and less casual than speakers using [ɪn]. In Edinburgh, results are markedly different. We argue that these differences are due to a combination of factors that include the historical development of (ing) in a particular locale, which led to differences in production, variations in language ideology and, as a result, class-specific evaluations that appear to be regionally dependent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 29 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, Adam J. (1979). Scottish speech: A historical view with special reference to the Standard English of Scotland. In Aitken, A. J. & McArthur, T. (eds.), The languages of Scotland. Edinburgh: Chambers. 85–119.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.2.35. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. Accessed August 5, 2011.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2007). Accent, (ING) and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82:32–64.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2009). The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21:135–156.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2011). The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22:423–441.Google Scholar
Charness, Gary, Gneezy, Uri, & Kuhn, Michael A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81:1–8.Google Scholar
Chirrey, Deborah. (1999). Edinburgh: Descriptive material. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 223–229.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–476.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.Google Scholar
FluidSurveys. (2016). FluidSurveys: Online survey software. Available at: http://fluidsurveys.com/. Accessed March 29, 2016.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. (2002). A textual history of Scots. Heidelberg: C. Winter. Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G. (1976). Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin 83:314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Drager, Katie, & Warren, Paul. (2010). Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another. Language and Speech 53:447–471.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (2006). IN/ING variable. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann. (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ing). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. (1989). When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16:248–267.Google Scholar
Jesperson, Otto. (1961). A Modern English grammar on historical perspectives. Part I: sounds and spellings. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, & Kiesling, Scott. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:5–33.Google Scholar
Keren, Gideon B., & Raaijmakers, Jeroen G. W. (1988). On between-subjects versus within-subjects comparisons in testing utility theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41:233–247.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (2004). Language ideologies. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell. 496–517.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1989). The child as a linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1:85–97.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej, & Nagy, Naomi. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:431–463.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez, & Fox, Sue. (2014). Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of (ING) and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42:185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K.S. (1997). Standards and variation in urban speech: Examples from Lowland Scots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathisen, Anne Grethe. (1999). Sandwell, West Midlands: Ambiguous perspectives on gender patterns and models of change. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G.J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 107–123.Google Scholar
Mees, Inger. (1977). Language and social class in Cardiff: A survey of the speech habits of schoolchildren. M.A. dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Schleef, Erik. (2013). Hitting an Edinburgh target: Immigrant adolescents’ acquisition of variation in Edinburgh English. In Lawson, R. (ed.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on Scotland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 103–128.Google Scholar
Moore, Samuel, Meech, Sanford Brown, & Whitehall, Harold. (1935). Middle English dialect characteristics and dialect boundaries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus Spindler, & Kristiansen, Tore. (2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43:1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1991). African American English in the diaspora: The case of old-line Nova Scotians. Language Variation and Change 3:301–339.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (2010). Variation in language regard. In Gilles, P., Scharloth, J., & Ziegler, E. (eds.), Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 7–27.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed March 26, 2014.Google Scholar
Reid, Euan C. (1978). Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Arnold. 158–171.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1984). The language of children and adolescents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, & Flynn, Nicholas E. J. (2015). Ageing meanings of (ing): age and indexicality in Manchester, England. English World-Wide 36:47–89.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, Flynn, Nicholas E. J., & Ramsammy, Michael. (2015). Production and perception of (ing) in Manchester English. In Torgersen, E., Hårstad, S., Mæhlum, B., & Røyneland, U. (eds.), Language variation: European perspectives V. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 197–209.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Clark, Lynn. (2011). Teenagers’ acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens’ realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-Wide 32:206–236.Google Scholar
Streiner, David L. (1994). Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 39:135–140.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.) The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 729–763.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali (2004). Somethi[ŋ]’s goi[n] on! Variable (ing) at ground zero. In Gunnarsson, B.-L., Bergstrom, L., Eklund, G., Fidell, S., Hansen, L. H., Karstadt, A., Nordberg, B., Sundergren, E., & Thelander, M. (eds.), Language variation in Europe. Uppsala: Uppsala University. 390–403.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Th. (1966). An historical syntax of the English language. Part two: syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Walker, Abby, García, Christina, Cortés, Yomi, & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2014). Comparing social meanings across listener and speaker groups: The indexical field of Spanish /s/. Language Variation and Change 26:169–189.Google Scholar
Watts, Emma. (2005). Mobility-induced dialect contact: A sociolinguistic investigation of speech variation in Wilmslow, Cheshire. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahn, Christopher J., & Hopper, Robert. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument (SEI). Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4:113–123.Google Scholar