Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:36:54.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A linguistic innovation of women in Cairo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Niloofar Haeri
Niloofar Haeri
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the sociolinguistic variable of apical palatalization in Cairene Arabic. First, I discuss its linguistic features and then its sociolinguistic distribution. The significance of palatalization as a sociolinguistic variable is its status as a stylistic resource of Cairene Arabic. Depending on the complex interaction of a number of factors, some Egyptians use features of Classical Arabic while speaking in Egyptian Arabic for stylistic purposes. Palatalization, on the other hand, is an example of a stylistic resource that belongs to Cairene Arabic proper. The roles of gender and social class in the distribution of palatalization are explored in some detail. As in a number of other speech communities, women in Cairo seem to have been the innovators of this sound change.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 87 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Jawad, Hassan. (1981). Lexical and phonological variation in spoken Arabic in Amman. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Badawi, S., & Hinds, M. (1986). Dictionary of Egyptian Arabic. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Bakir, Muhammad. (1986). Sex differences in the approximation to standard Arabic: A case study. Anthropological Linguistics 28:3–10.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. (1978). A general study of palatalization. In Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C., & Moravcsik, E. (eds.), Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 47–91.Google Scholar
Blanc, Haim. (1974). The nekteb-nektebu imperfect in a variety of Cairene Arabic. Israeal Oriental Studies 4:206–226.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen. (1976). The phonology of Egyptian Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (1992). Think practically and look logically: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. (1987). Male/female differences in speech: An alternative interpretation. In-Denning, K. M., Inkelas, S., McNair-Knox, F. C., & Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV. Stanford: Stanford University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. (1991). Sociolinguistic variation in Cairene Arabic: Palatalization and the qaf in the speech of men and women. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. (1992a). Synchronic variation in Cairene Arabic: The case of palatalization. In Broselow, E., Eid, M., & McCarthy, J. (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics IV (pp. 169–180) (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 85). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar (1992b). Above and beyond conservation and innovation: Gender and negotiations of meaning. Paper presented at NWAV-XXI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Muhammad. (1986). Standard and prestige language: A problem in Arabic sociolinguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 281:115–126.Google Scholar
Kahn, M. (1975). Arabic emphatics: The evidence for cultural determinants of phonetic sex-typing. Phonetica 31:38–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, Patricia. (1988). A survey of phonological features. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1982). Building on empirical foundations: Perspectives on historical linguistics. In Perspectives in Arabic linguistics IV.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1991). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1956). An introduction to Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Royal, Ann-Marie. (1985). Male/female pharyngealization patterns in Cairo Arabic: A socio-linguistic study of two neighborhoods (Texas Linguistics Forum 27). Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sallam, A. M. (1980). Phonological variation in Educated Spoken Arabic: A study of the uvular and related plosive types. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 43.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard. (1974). Sociolinguistic variation in spoken Arabic in Egypt: A re-examination of the concept of diglossia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Wahba, Kassem M. (1991). An acoustic study of vowel variation in colloquial Egyptian Arabic. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Symposium of Arabic Linguistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar