Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:31:28.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From interference to transfer in language contact: Variation in voice onset time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2014

Luiza Newlin-Łukowicz*
Affiliation:
New York University

Abstract

This study examines cross-generational differences in the realization of an English phonological contrast by bilingual Polish Americans in New York City. I analyze the production of voice onset time (VOT) in underlying stops, as in tin and den, and stops derived from interdental fricatives, as in [t]in for thin and [d]en for then, in an English-only reading task. Generation one exhibits VOT “interference” for both stop types, with a bias toward interference for voiced stops. Generation two “transfers” Polish-like VOTs to derived stops. I argue that the cross-generational progression from the global effects of interference to the focused presence of transfer is filtered through L1 markedness and reflects speakers' growing sensitivity to L2 phonology and social considerations. The observed asymmetries in the distribution of interference/transfer are unaccountable by existing models of L2 acquisition and motivate a view of L1/L2 phonetic categories as governed by a variable grammar with access to phonological and social information.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, Hugh Douglas, & Regan, Vera M. (1991). The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language: A preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13:122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbitt, Eugene Howard. (1896). The language of the lower classes in New York City and vicinity. Dialect Notes 1:457464.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, & Maechler, Martin. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed February 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, & Preston, Dennis. (1996). Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara. (2010). Social conflict and social practice on the Lower East Side: A study of regional dialect features in New York City English. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues. Baltimore: York Press. 171204.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine, & Tyler, Michael. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, M. & Bohn, O.-S. (eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.63. Available at: http://www.praat.org/. Accessed January 24, 2014.Google Scholar
Britain, David. (2002). Diffusion, leveling, simplification and reallocation in past tense BE in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1):1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta I., & Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50:333355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Charles, Yao, Yao, Haynes, Erin F., & Rhodes, Russell. (2011). Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129:39643980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Docherty, Gerard. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Rob. (2012). Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of Polish migrants living in Manchester, UK. Language Variation and Change 24:107133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie, & Horvath, Barbara. (1998). Let's tink about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10:245261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie, & Horvath, Barbara. (2000). When the music changes, you change too: Gender and language change in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 11:287313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Baltimore: York Press. 233272.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil, & Brown, William Samuel. (1982). The voicing contrast between English /p/ and /b/ as a function of stress and position-in-utterance. Journal of Phonetics 10:335345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil, & Eefting, Wieke. (1987). The production and perception of English stops by Spanish speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics 15:6783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1991). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3:223239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2009). Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Heselwood, Barry, & McChrystal, Louise. (2000). Gender, accent featured and voicing in Panjabi-English bilingual children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8:4570.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. (2005). Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of laryngeal specifications. In van Oostendorp, M. & van de Weijer, J. (eds.), The internal organization of phonological segments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 319354.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K., & Salmons, Joseph C. (1995). aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12:369396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K., & Salmons, Joseph C. (1999). Glottal spreading bias in Germanic. Linguistische Berichte 178:135151.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen, & Lyle, Samantha. (2009). Variation in stop consonant voicing in two regional varieties of American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39:313334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kager, René, van der Feest, Suzanne, Fikkert, Paula, Kerkhoff, Annemarie, & Zamuner, Tania. (2007). Representations of [voice]: Evidence from acquisition. In van de Weijer, J. M. & van der Torre, E. J. (eds.), Voicing in Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 4180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia Ann. (1980). A phonetic study of a voicing contrast in Polish. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar
Keating, PatriciaAnn, Mikoś, Micheal J., & Ganong, William F. (1981). A cross-language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70:12611271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, Leigh, & Abramson, Arthur S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20:384422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. (2003). Second language data and constraints on Manner: Explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research 19:225250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, Ian R. A., Flege, James Emil, Piske, Thorsten, & Carlo Schirru. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110:516528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. (2002). Language and identity. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. 475499.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, & Kochetov, Alexei. (2013). Voice onset time across the generations: A cross-linguistic study of contact-induced change. In Siemund, P., Gogolin, I., Schulz, M., & Davydova, J. (eds.), Multilingualism and language contact in urban areas: Acquisition—development—teaching—communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza. (2013). TH-stopping in New York City: Substrate effect turned ethnic marker? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 41 19(2):151160.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis. (1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed February 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David. (1978). Probability and linguistic variation. Synthèse 37:217238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. (2002). Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 638668.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Clark, Lynn. (2011). Teenagers' acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens' realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-wide 32(2):206236.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. (2005). Language transfer and discourse universals in Indian English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27:535566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani, & Sankaran, Lavanya. (2011). Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23:399428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Ellen. (2010). Voicing in contrast. Acquiring a second language laryngeal system. Gent: Academia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, Megha. (2005). Acoustic-phonetics of coronal stops: A cross-language study of Canadian English and Canadian French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118:10261037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. (2003). Contact as a source of language change. In Joseph, B. D. & Janda, R. D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. 687712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. (2010). Contact explanations in linguistics. In Hickey, R. (ed.), The handbook of language contact. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. 3147.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, & Kaufman, Terrence. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Alphen, P. M. (2007). Prevoicing in Dutch initial plosives: Production, perception, and word recognition. In Van de Weijer, J. & van der Torre, E. J. (eds.), Voicing in Dutch. (De)voicing—phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 99124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. (1988). Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Jongman, Allard, Sereno, Joan, & Kemps, Rachel. (2004). Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32:251276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteside, Sandra P., Henry, Luisa, & Dobbin, Rachel. (2004). Sex differences in voice onset time: A developmental study of phonetic context effects in British English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116:11791183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Carter, Phillip, & Moriello, Beckie. (2004). Emerging Hispanic English: New dialect formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:339358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Hatfield, Deborah. (1984). Tense marking in second language learning: Patterns of spoken and written English in a Vietnamese community. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zhao, Sherry Y. (2010). Stop-like modification of the dental fricative /ð/: An acoustic analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128:20092020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar