Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:38:23.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The emergence of a new phoneme: Foreign (a) in Canadian English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2009

Charles Boberg
Affiliation:
McGill University

Abstract

The nativization or phonological adaptation of words transferred from other languages can have structural-phonological consequences for the recipient language. In English, nativization of words in which the stressed vowel is spelled with the letter <a>, here called “foreign (a)” words, leads to variable outcomes, because English <a> represents not one but three phonemes. The most common outcomes historically have been /ey/ (as in potato), /æ/ (tobacco), and /ah/ (spa), but vowel choice shows diachronic, social, and regional variation, including systematic differences between major national dialects. British English uses /ah/ for long vowels and /æ/ elsewhere, American English prefers /ah/ everywhere, whereas Canadian English traditionally prefers /æ/. The Canadian pattern is now changing, with younger speakers adopting American /ah/-variants. This article presents new data on foreign (a) in Canadian English, confirming the use of /ah/ among younger speakers, but finds that some outcomes cannot be classified as either /æ/ or /ah/. A third, phonetically intermediate outcome is often observed. Acoustic analysis confirms the extraphonemic status of these outcomes, which may constitute a new low-central vowel phoneme in Canadian English.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anttila, Raimo. (1989). Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avis, Walter S. (1956). Speech differences along the Ontario-United States border. III. Pronunciation. Journal of the Canadian Linguistic Association 2(2):4159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avis, Walter S. (1973). The English language in Canada. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 10: Linguistics in North America. The Hague: Mouton. 4074.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. (1935). A history of the English language. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company Incorporated.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (1997). Variation and change in the nativization of foreign (a) in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (1999). The attitudinal component of variation in American English foreign (a) nativization. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):4961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (2000). Geolinguistic diffusion and the U.S.-Canada border. Language Variation and Change 12:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (2005). The Canadian Shift in Montreal. Language Variation and Change 17(2):133154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (2008). Regional phonetic differentiation in Standard Canadian English. Journal of English Linguistics 36(2):129154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2006). The development of Canadian English. In Bolton, K. & Kachru, B. B. (eds.), World Englishes: Critical concepts in linguistics. London: Routledge. 383395.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra, Elms, Ford, & Youssef, Amani. (1995). The third dialect of English: Some Canadian evidence. Language Variation and Change 7:209228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H., & Warkentyne, Henry J. (1993). Retracting of /æ/ in Vancouver English. In Clarke, S. (ed.), Focus on Canadian English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 229246.Google Scholar
Gramley, Stephan, & Pätzold, Kurt-Michael. (1992). A survey of Modern English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert J. (1957). Notes on the pronunciation of Canadian English as spoken in Vancouver, B.C. Journal of the Canadian Linguistic Association 3(1):2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, Robert J. (2004). The survey of Vancouver English, 1976–1984: Methdology, planning, implementation and analysis. In De Wolf, G. Dodds, Fee, M., & McAlpine, J. (eds.), The survey of Vancouver English: A sociolinguistic study of Urban Canadian English. Kingston, Ontario: Strathy Language Unit. 1138.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. (1986). Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, John Samuel, & Knott, Thomas Albert. (1944). A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Company Publishers.Google Scholar
Krapp, George Philip. (1919). The pronunciation of Standard English in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Geoff. (1990). Quantity and quality in British and American vowel systems. In Ramsaran, S. (ed.), Studies in the pronunciation of English. London: Routledge. 106118.Google Scholar
McCrum, Robert, Cran, William, & MacNeil, Robert. (1986). The story of English. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mencken, Henry Louis. (1937). The American language, 4th ed.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Nearey, Terrance Michael. (1978). Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Scargill, Matthew H., & Warkentyne, Henry J. (1972). The survey of Canadian English: A report. English Quarterly 5:47104.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. (1997). Broad and flat A in marked words. American Speech 72(4):437439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Charles Kenneth. (1958). An introduction to the phonetics of American English, 2nd ed.New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, & Kaufman, Terrence. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, & Hannah, Jean. (1985). International English: A Guide to Standard Varieties of English. 2nd ed.London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Trager, George L., & Smith, Henry Lee Jr.. (1951). An outline of English structure. Norman, OK.: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. (1988). Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 1: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woods, Howard B. (1999). The Ottawa survey of Canadian English. Kingston, Ontario: Strathy Language Unit, Queen's University.Google Scholar