Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:44:07.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensions of register variation in Somali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Douglas Biber  and
Mohamed Hared
Douglas Biber
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Mohamed Hared
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study uses a multidimensional approach to analyze the linguistic characteristics of Somali spoken and written registers. Somali is unusual in that it has a very short history of literacy (only since 1973), but at present it has a wide range of written and spoken registers, including governmental, educational, and public information uses. It thus represents a very different language type from previously described languages. We analyze the distribution of 65 linguistic features across 279 texts from 26 spoken and written registers, using factor analysis to identify five major dimensions of variation. None of these dimensions defines an absolute dichotomy between spoken and written registers, although three of the dimensions can be considered “oral/literate” parameters. As in the multidimensional analyses of other languages, the present study shows that no single dimension adequately describes the relations among spoken and written registers; rather, each dimension reflects a different set of communicative functions relating to the purpose, general topic, degree of interactiveness, personal involvement, production circumstances, and other physical mode characteristics. In the conclusion, we briefly discuss our findings relative to previous multidimensional analyses of English, Tuvaluan, and Korean, laying the foundation for cross-linguistic analyses of universal tendencies of register variation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 41 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinnaso, F. Niyi. (1982). On the differences between spoken and written language. Language and Speech 25:97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Karen. (1984). Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 45–80.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language 64:707–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62:384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27:3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. (1992). Cross-linguistic patterns of register variation: A multi-dimensional comparison of English, Tuvaluan, Korean, and Somali. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65:487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Hared, Mohamed. (1992). Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12:260–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Hared, Mohamed. (in press). Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. In Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Fraser, Colin. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In Scherer, Klaus R. & Giles, Howard (eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 33–62.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 35–53.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Tannen, Deborah. (1987). The relation between written and spoken language. Annual Review of Anthropology 16:383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. (1982). Written and spoken style in Japanese narratives. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 55–76.Google Scholar
Deibler, Ellis W. Jr (1976). Differences between written and oral styles in languages near Goroka. Read 11:77–79.Google Scholar
Duff, Martha. (1973). Contrastive features of oral and written texts in Amuesha. Notes on Translation 50:2–13.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. (1972). On Sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 213–250.Google Scholar
Hurd, Conrad. (1979). A study of oral versus written Nasioi discourse. Read 14:84–86.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Barry. (1976). Written and oral language in Southern Chimbu. Read 11:74–76.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-Jin. (1990). Register variation in Korean: A corpus-based study. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1982). The gulf between spoken and written language: A case study in Chinese. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 77–88.Google Scholar
Nelson, Harold D. (ed.). (1982). Somalia: A country study. Washington, DC: U.S. Government.Google Scholar
Saeed, John Ibrahim. (1984). The syntax of focus and topic in Somali. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Saeed, John Ibrahim. (1987). Somali reference grammar. Wheaton, MD: Dunwoody.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. (1982a). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deborah, Tannen. (ed.). (1982b). Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar