Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:15:36.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deflection in Flemish between the 13th and 20th centuries: An interplay between analogical and articulatory factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Marinel Gerritsen
Marinel Gerritsen
Affiliation:
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University of Nijmegen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article deals with the linguistic embedding, transition, and actuation of the obliteration of the gerund ending -e in the West Flemish dialect of Bruges between the 13th and 20th centuries. The following factors appear to have played a part in the change: syllable structure of the verb, nasalization of the last consonant of the stem, and frequency of the verb. The study shows that deflection (loss of inflections) started in the 14th century and is almost complete today. There are strong indications that the obliteration of the gerund ending was originally caused by analogical factors, but that articulatory factors played a leading role in the ensuing centuries. The areal spread of the linguistic factors that condition the occurrence of the gerund ending in the dialects in the region around Bruges nowadays suggests that the diachronic development in Bruges is not idiosyncratic for Bruges but holds for a much larger area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 15 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, Jean. (1991). Language change: Progress or decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Antilla, Raimo. (1989). Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bakker, Jan J. M. (1971). Constant en variabel. De fonematische structuur van de Nederlandse woordvorm. Asten: Schriks' drukkerij.Google Scholar
Bauwens, Anaïs. (1965). Enkele syntactische kenmerken van het Brugs dialect. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Blauwet, Jos. (1979). Ip z'n Brugs 2. Bruges: N.V. Westvlaamse Drukkerij en uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rooij, Jaap. (1986). Wezen en zijn. In Hoppenbrouwers, Cor et al. (eds.), Proeven van taalwetenschap. Groningen: Groningen University Press. 295–309.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. (1972). Allegroregeln rechtfertigen Lentoregeln. Sekundäre Phoneme des Bretonischen. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, Marinel. (1987). Syntaktische verandering in kontrolezinnen. Een sociolinguïstische studie van het Brugs van de 13 tot de 17e eeuw. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, Marinel. (1989). Een sociolinguïstische aanpak van taalverandering geïllustreerd aan een onderzoek naar het verdwijnen van het gerundium. De Nieuwe Taalgids 82(2):97–120.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, Marinel. (1990). The rise of om in Middle Dutch infinitive constructions. In Andersen, Henning & Koerner, Konrad (eds.), Historical linguistics 1987: Papers from the 8th international conference on historical linguistics (8 ICHL). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliodts van Severen, L. (1899). Inventaire diplomatique des archives de l'ancienne Ecole Bogarde a Bruges. 2 vols. Bruges.Google Scholar
Het Brugs Ommeland: handelingen van de heemkundige kring ‘Maurits van Coppenolle’—St. Andries. 1 (1961). Nowadags.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1978). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In Christie, William M. Jr (ed.), Current progress in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 95–106.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jozef. (1927). Het Westvlaamsch. Groningen and The Hague: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lootens, Adolf. (1939). Oude Kindervertelsels in den Bruggschen tongval. Bruges: Lucien de Reyghere.Google Scholar
Manczak, Witold. (1980). Frequenz und Sprachwandel. In Ludtke, Helmut (ed.), Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 37–80.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. (1984). On the hierarchy of factors causing shwa loss in Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 4(85):445–453.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. (1991). The history of final vowels in English: The sound of muting. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. (1984). Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60(2):320–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RND. (1925–1985). Reeks Nederlandse Dialectatlassen. Blanquaert, E. & Pée, Willem (eds.). Antwerp: De Sikkel.Google Scholar
Ryckeboer, Hugo. (1986). Het werkwoord doen in replieken. In Devos, Magda & Taeldeman, Johan (eds.), Vruchten van z'n akker, Opstellen van (oud-)medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. dr. V. F. Vanacker. Ghent: Rijkuniversiteit Gent. 321–339.Google Scholar
Schouteet, Albert. (1958). Gedenkweerdige aenteeckeningen van Jan Karel Verbrugge. Brugse Kroniek over 1765–1825. Bruges.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. & MacWhinney, F. (1986). Form-oriented inflectional errors in language processing. Cognitive Psychology 18:329–354.Google Scholar
Stoett, F. A. (1923). Middelnederlandse spraakkunst. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Uit den Boogaert, Piet C. (1975). Woordfrequenties in gesproken en geschreven Nederlands. Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema en Holkema.Google Scholar
Van Loey, Adolphe. (1968). Quelques considérations sur les formes du verbe être en germanique occidental. In Mededelingen van de klasse der letteren en der morele en staatkundige wetenschappen. 4e reeks. Boek LIV. Brussel.Google Scholar
Van Loey, Adolphe. (1980). Middelnederlandse spraakkunst I. Vormleer. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Th. (1972). An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Weijnen, Antonius A. (1966). Nederlandse Dialectkunde. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Wilmans, W. (1922). Deutsche Grammatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Winkler, Johan. (1874). Algemeen Nederduitsch en Friesch dialecticon. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar