Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:19:27.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Word knowledge, learning and acquisition in a second language: Proposed replications of Elgort (2011) and Qiao and Forster (2017)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2019

Irina Elgort
Irina Elgort*
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What does it mean to learn a word? How can we tell when a sequence of letters or sounds becomes a word in the mind of the learner? While many second language (L2) vocabulary teaching and learning studies continue to use traditional vocabulary tests to measure learning (such as multiple choice, translation, gap-fill), these measures tend to come short when researchers want to address theoretical questions about the nature of L2 word knowledge. In the present paper, I argue for conceptualising word learning as lexicalisation, which necessitates the use of alternative approaches to measuring learning. I then propose approximate and conceptual replications of two theoretically motivated L2 word learning studies, Elgort (2011) and Qiao and Forster (2017), that used the Prime Lexicality Effect as a measure of lexicalisation of deliberately learned L2 words.

Type
Replication Research
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 260 - 270
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutalebi, J. (2008). Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica, 128, 466–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 299–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(1), 152–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Cao, F., Brennan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2014). The brain adapts to orthography with experience: Evidence from English and Chinese. Developmental Science, doi: 10.1111/desc.12245Google Scholar
Cao, F., Tao, R., Liu, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Booth, J. R. (2013). High proficiency in a second language is characterized by greater involvement of the first language network: Evidence from Chinese learners of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1649–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the ‘Reading Wars’: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687.Google ScholarPubMed
Dirix, N., Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2018). How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations. Behavior research methods, November 12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1158-9Google Scholar
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 954–969.Google ScholarPubMed
Dupuy, B., & Krashen, S. D. (1993). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in French as a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 4, 55–63.Google Scholar
Elgort, I. (2007). The role of intentional decontextualised learning in second language vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from primed lexical decision tasks with advanced bilinguals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Elgort, I. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I. (2018). Technology mediated vocabulary development in a second or foreign language: A critical review. CALICO Journal, 25, 1–29. DOI: 10.1558/cj.34554Google Scholar
Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., & Van Assche, E. (2018). Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye-movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I., Candry, S., Boutorwick, T. J., Eyckmans, J., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). Contextual word learning with form-focused and meaning-focused elaboration: A comparative study. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 646–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw029Google Scholar
Elgort, I., Perfetti, C. A., Rickles, B., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015). Contextual learning of L2 word meanings: Second language proficiency modulates behavioural and event-related brain potential (ERP) indicators of learning. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 506–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.942673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I., & Piasecki, A. E. (2014). The effect of a bilingual learning mode on the establishment of lexical semantic representations in the L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 572–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014). L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, 64, 365–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Vereŝ, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 314–498.Google ScholarPubMed
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3, 128–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30, 1383–1400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, N., & Forster, K. I. (2001). Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 44(1), 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (1997). Orthographic knowledge in L2 lexical processing: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 35–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laufer, B., & Aviad-Levitzky, T. (2017). What type of vocabulary knowledge predicts reading comprehension: Word meaning recall or word meaning recognition? Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 729–741.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinus, E., Nation, K., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). Density and length in the neighborhood: Explaining cross-linguistic differences in learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 127–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68, 321–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2009). Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muljani, N., Koda, K., & Moates, D. R. (1998). The development of word recognition in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, M., & Lupker, S. (2018). Is there lexical competition in the recognition of L2 words for different-script bilinguals? An examination using masked priming with Japanese-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1168–1185.Google ScholarPubMed
Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2014). Do masked orthographic neighbor primes facilitate or inhibit the processing of Kanji compound words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 813–840.Google ScholarPubMed
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, A. J., Tremblay, A., Nichols, E. S., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The influence of language proficiency on lexical semantic processing in native and late learners of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1205–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 9–29. doi:10.18806/tesl.v11i1.623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2015). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing system variations. In Koda, K. & Zehler, A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 13–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. R., Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2008). An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 36–68. doi:10.1080/01690960701578112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. A., Segalowitz, N., O'Brien, I., & Yamasaki, N. (2004). Semantic priming in a first and second language: Evidence from reaction time variability and event-related brain potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porte, G., & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 1064–1074.Google ScholarPubMed
Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2017). Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization. Cognition, 158, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiao, X., Forster, K. I., & Witzel, N. (2009). Is BANARA really a word? Cognition, 113, 254–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebuschat, P., Meurers, D., & McEnery, T. (2017). Language learning research at the intersection of experimental, computational, and corpus-based approaches. Language Learning, 67(S1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Using E–Z Reader to simulate eye movements in non-reading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 5–35. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segalowitz, N. S., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatisation effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovitch, K., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, N., Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2017). Orthographic learning, fast and slow: Lexical competition effects reveal the time course of word learning in developing readers. Cognition, 163, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word recognition processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2015). Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 586–595.Google ScholarPubMed
Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2017). Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 519–528. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witzel, N., & Forster, K. I. (2012). How L2 words are stored: The episodic L2 hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1608–1621.Google ScholarPubMed