Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:06:17.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic competence and the learner's strategic control of the language learning process*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

David Little
David Little
Affiliation:
Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity College Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Council of Europe
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 94 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Van Ek, J. A. (1986). Objectives for foreign language learning. Volume 1: Scope.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M. (1990). Threshold level 1990.Google Scholar
Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning.Google Scholar
Holec, H. (1988). Autonomy and self-directed learning: present fields of application.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (in press). Strategic competence. In Strategies in language learning and use.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (eds.), Language and communication, 2–27. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1–47.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction: learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Faerch, & Kasper, (eds), Strategies in interlanguage communication, 20–60. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strategies in second language research: a critique, a revision, and some (non-)implications for the classroom. In Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., Smith, M. Sharwood & Swain, M. (eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research, 142–61. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E., Ammerlaan, A., Bongaerts, T. & Poulisse, N. (1990). System and hierarchy in L2 compensatory strategies. In Scarcella, R., Andersen, E. & Krashen, S. (eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H. & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series, 7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
O'malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. (1989). Language learning strategies. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N. (1990). The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T. & Kellerman, E. 1987: The use of retrospective verbal reports in the analysis of compensatory strategies. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Introspection in second language research, 213–29. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In Wenden, & Rubin, (eds), 15–30.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. (1982). How to be a more successful language learner. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Sharwood, Smith M. (1981). Consciousness raising and the second language learner, Applied Linguistics 2. 2, 159–68.Google Scholar
Linstern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teadring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1977). Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: a progress report. In Brown, H. D., Yorio, C. A. & Crymes, R. (eds.), On TESOL ’77: Teaching and Learning ESL, 194–203. Washington, D. C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk and repair in interlanguage, Language Learning 30, 417–31.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (eds), Learner strategies in language learning, 3–13. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1983). New starts and different kinds of failure. In Freedman, A., Pringle, I. & Yalden, J. (eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language, 34–47. London: Longman.Google Scholar