No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Review of research on language teaching, learning and policy published in 2008
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 August 2010
Extract
The format for the present review is similar to that of previous years, though the number of references to research published before 2008 has been somewhat increased in order to identify a few key studies which have influenced some of 2008's published output. In selecting the texts for discussion, I have sought to offer the reader what I consider to be an overview of key themes emerging from the 2008 research which are in one way or another related to the teaching and learning of additional languages, and policies pertaining thereto. In doing so, I have tried to draw on a fairly broad range of journals, languages, countries, sectors of education and research approaches. However, in the space available (which is generous) I find it possible to discuss only some 80–90 articles out of a field of well over 1000 that would be available, if I had the time and the energy to read them all. Accordingly, there is no sense in which I am claiming that those selected are the cream which has risen to the top. There must be many articles not included in the present review which are equal in quality to those I have been able to include.
- Type
- Annual Research Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
Abrams, Z. (2008). Alternative second language curricula for learners with disabilities: Two case studies. The Modern Language Journal 92.iii, 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACTFL (2006). ACTFL proficiency guidelines – speaking: Revised 1999. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
ACTFL (1999). National standards in foreign language education project: Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Yonkers: NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78.iv, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. (2008). Contesting ‘language’ as ‘heritage’: Negotiation of identities in late modernity. Applied Linguistics 29.4, 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chen, N.-S., Hsieh, S.-W. & Kinshuk, A. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology 12.3, 93–113.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-M. (2008). Learning to assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research 12.2, 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagenais, D. & Moore, D. (2008). Representations des littératies plurilingues, de l'immersion en français, et des dynamiques identitaires chez des parents chinois. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes 65.1, 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal 92.ii, 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). Investigating the psychological and the emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal 89.iii, 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M., Petrides, K. V. & Furnham, A. (2008). Effects of trait of emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning 58.4, 911–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, C. (2008). Age effects on the process of L2 acquisition? Evidence from the acquisition of negation and finiteness in German. Language Learning 58.1, 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dlaska, A. & Krekeler, C. (2008). Self-assessment of pronunciation. System 36, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (1998). MFL inspected: Reflections on inspection findings 1996/1997. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching & Research.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2008). The dynamics of second langague emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 92.ii, 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed second langauge acquisition: A literature review. Ministry of Education, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008). The effect of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language context. System 36, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, C. (2008). Questions of classroom identity: What can be learned from codeswitching in classroom peer-group talk? The Modern Language Journal 92.4, 538–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL 20.2, 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2008a). Face to face with the ghost in the machine: psycholinguistics and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42.3, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2008b). Guest editor's introduction. Emergent and divergent: A view of second language listening research. System 36, 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2008c). Bricks or mortar: Which parts of input does a second language listener rely on? TESOL Quarterly 42.3, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gándara, P. & Baca, G. (2008). No Child Left Behind and California's English language learners: The perfect storm. Language Policy 7.3, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorusk, G. & Taguchi, E. (2008). Repeated reading for developing reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of EFL learners in Vietnam. System 36, 253–278.Google Scholar
Graham, S. & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower intermediate learners of French. Language Learning 58.4, 747–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, F. (2008). Integrating focus on form in L2 content enriched instruction lessons. Foreign Language Annals 41.2, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilloteaux, M. & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly 42.1, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, A. A. (2008). Microgenesis, Method and Object: A study of a collaborative activity in a Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Applied Linguistics 29.1, 120–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häcker, M. (2008). Eleven pets and 20 ways to express one's opinion: The vocabulary learners acquire in English secondary schools. Language Learning Journal 36.2, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, C. A., de Jong, E. J. & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequences of No Child Left Behind. Language Policy 7.3, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, A. & Apelgren, M. (2008). Young learners and multilingualism: A study of learner attitudes before and after the introduction of a second foreign language to the curriculum. System 36, 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, T. A. (2008). Integrative motivation as a predictor of achievement in the foreign language classroom. Applied Language Learning 81.1 & 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
Humphreys, G. & Spratt, M. (2008). Many languages, many motivations: A study of Hong Kong students’ motivation to learn different target languages. System 36, 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, A. & Begler, D. (1998). Current research and practice in teaching vocabulary. The Language Teacher. www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/1998/01/hunt.Google Scholar
Iannacci, L. (2008). Beyond the pragmatic and the liminal: Culturally and linguistically diverse students code-switching in early-years classrooms. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada 25.2, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K. & Bañados, E. (2008). Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing language learning programs. ReCALL 20.2, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessner, U. (2008a). A DST model of multilingualism and multilingual awareness. The Modern Language Journal 92.ii, 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessner, U. (2008b). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching 41.1, 15–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kans, D. M. (2008). The classroom language use of a Korean elementary school EFL teacher: Another look at TETE. System 36, 214–226.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2008). The effects of integrated language-based instruction in elementary ESL learning. The Modern Language Journal 92.iii, 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. & Csizér, K. (2008). Age-related differences in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language: Attitudes, selves and motivated behaviour. Language Learning 58.2, 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics 29.4, 645–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile-assisted language delivery: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 20.3, 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Research and methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92.ii, 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice on-line interaction. Language Learning & Technology 12.3, 53–72.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-K. & Huang, H.-T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning. A meta-analytic study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. (2008). Published output, noticing, and development of past-tense morphology in content-based instruction. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes 65.2, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, M. & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal 92.i, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E. & Erler, L. (2008). Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics 29.1, 90–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, B., Coniam, D. & Chan, M. S. K. (2008). A buddy reading programme in Hong Kong schools. ELT Journal 62.4, 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menken, K. (2008). Editorial: Introduction to the thematic issue. Language Policy 7.3, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, J., Daller, H., Malvern, D., Meara, P., Richards, B. & Treffers-Daller, J. (2008). Guest editorial. Special issue on vocabulary. Language Learning Journal 36, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, H-T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning 58.1, 73–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd edn.), London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, N. & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginners-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research 12.1, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. (2008). Supporting learner autonomy: developing practice through the production of courses for distance learners of French, German and Spanish. Language Teaching Research 12.1, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Muircheartaigh, J. & Hickey, T. (2008). Academic outcomes, anxiety and attitudes on early and late immersion in Ireland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 11.5, 558–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching. Language Teaching 41.4, 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, B., Malvern, D. & Graham, S. (2008). Word frequency and trends in the development of French vocabulary in lower-intermediate students during Year 12 in English schools. Language Learning Journal 36.2, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rysiewicz, J. (2008). Cognitive profiles of (un)successful FL learners: A cluster analytical study. The Modern Language Journal 92.i, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samimy, K. (2008). Advanced oral proficiency in Arabic: A case study. Foreign Language Annals 41.3, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in L2 learning. Applied Linguistics 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article. Instructed L2 vocabulary building. Language Teaching Research 12.3, 329–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuetze, U. (2008). Exchanging L2 messages online: Developing an intercultural communicative competence? Foreign Language Annals 41.4, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, V. M. & de la Fuente, M. J. (2008). What's the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising, form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal 92.i, 100–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning 58.4, 835–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S.-K. (2008). ‘Fire your proofreader!’. Grammar correction in the writing classroom. ELT Journal 62.4, 358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. & Foster, P.. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University, National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly 42.2, 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in L2 learning. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–144.Google Scholar
Thonn, J. (2008). The impact of age-related hearing impairments on the L2 classroom. Language Learning Journal 36.1, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008). Error correction, revision and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2008). Is noticing vital for L2 learning? A critical review of Schmidt's ‘noticing hypothesis’. Teaching English in China 31.3, 3–8.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B. & Paribahkt, T. S. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second-language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal 84.2, 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, M., Wang, J. & Spencer, K. (2008). Raising students’ awareness of cross cultural contrastive rhetoric in English writing via an e-learning course. Language Learning and Technology 12.2, 71–93.Google Scholar